Everytime someone uses phrases like "Dead internet theory", I assume they're some crab living under a rock with limited real world experiences. And it fits every time.
Sometimes it really feels like CCP has never heard of Streisand effect. Snowflakes, LMAO
Making it a commercial business makes it unethical. Who's to say they won't be exploiting the poor, desperate people and twisting the legality, cross country loopholes to profit?
Do you think diamonds, lithium, rare metals are ethically sourced too, just because the retailer/marketing says so?
Does exploiting people for profits upset you? How many of the "most" need to be unethical to upset you?
Post like these confirm to people saying only the most lunatic fringe, out of touch with reality left reddit during/after the reddit controversy.
Normalise criticizing both the West and China/Russia for their shit.
Don't make it your identity to defend horrible shit, anywhere.
Past or Present
Industrial is not all high tech or efficiency driven.
It's about cost and availability. They probably buy in bulk, have some Linux image with the exact setup they need. Then they just replace them if they break with little to no downtime.
I thought the parody site was clownstrike.com and went there but apparently crowdstrike bought it and redirects it to it's main site. lol
the person you replied to is lemmy.world user.
edit: oh wait this is an .world server/user who think they're better just because. Makes sense.
Stop posting your blogspam
Cult members sure dislike it when their team's truth is put out in open.
We shipped all our manufacturing to a country that allows slave labor and now they're beating us.
hey, but you get to deflect from that like you're role models of human rights. until you look into your history, oh wait…
Better doesn't always mean innovative. How many new innovation have really happened in cars in recent years? Is this years iPhones better than last years? by nominal additions to the package without any real headliner, of course yes. That's what's happening.
The article doesn't even try to say they're being innovative and you're really trying to shoe horn your extreme dislike of the fact they're ahead.
No shit Sherlock!
People who know how to use a forum aren't the ones who need to know a public forum is public.
What kind of gotchas did you think you were making?