667

joined 1 year ago
[–] 667@lemmy.radio 4 points 1 month ago

I’ll need to flip on this.

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why not Zoidberg?

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why can't the world have more of this and less of... everything else that's going on right now?

Because if it doesn’t generate shareholder value, corps are not interested.

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 3 points 1 month ago

I used to do this with YouMail before their service got cattywumpus.

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 57 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This is a “dummy pronoun” and I only know this because this popped up as a TIL earlier this week.

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 85 points 1 month ago (8 children)

It’s what it’s.

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I’ve been to SCS’s website and it seems… incomplete? It was on mobile so maybe that makes a difference but with how often I’ve seen it recommended I was surprised to see a site which did not look done. Did I miss something on their site?

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Only if it had writing on it.

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 13 points 1 month ago

The article was interesting, and spent vastly more time discussing the practical aspects of statistical analysis; it uses a great, and relatable, real-world example to showcase how statistics can be useful, or where it can be led astray.

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I said it loud too while watching it: “that shit’s over 100°C… and they’re going right in?”

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 5 points 2 months ago

Next week is inconvenient for me as my existential dread has flared up again. Can we try tomorrow?

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 6 points 2 months ago

You leave Jack Burton alone! We are in his debt. He showed great courage!

view more: ‹ prev next ›