this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
511 points (97.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43893 readers
683 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So ddg is down, so I visit Google. It's been some years.

I just can't believe how poor it's results are, and how it's trying to suggest things it think I might also want (and failing miserably).

I just assumed ddg would be the lesser, but I use it for privacy. Turns out I'm wrong.

How long has Google been this bad?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 169 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (14 children)

I just assumed ddg would be the lesser, but I use it for privacy. Turns out I'm wrong.

If you're using DDG for privacy, then indeed you are wrong.

It may be "less invasive" than google, but it's neither anonymous, nor private.

Here's a bunch more reasons from techrights.org, a site dedicated to digital freedom and exposing corruption.

Direct privacy abuse:

DDG was caught violating its own privacy policy by issuing tracker cookies.

DDG’s app sends every URL you visit to DDG servers. (reaction).

DDG is currently collecting users’ operating systems and everything they highlight in the search results. (to verify this, simply hit F12 in your browser and select the “network” tab. Do a search with javascript enabled. Highlight some text on the screen. Mouseover the traffic rows and see that your highlighted text, operating system, and other details relating to geolocation are sent to DDG. Then change the query and submit. Notice that the previous query is being transmitted with the new query to link the queries together)

DDG is accused of fingerprinting users’ browsers.

When clicking an ad on the DDG results page, all data available in your session is sent to the advertiser, which is why the Epic browser project refuses to set DDG as the default browser.

DDG blacklisted Framabee, a search engine for the highly respected framasoft.org consortium."

CloudFlare:

DDG promotes one of the largest privacy abusing tech giants and adversary to the Tor community: CloudFlare Inc. DDG results give high rankings to CloudFlare sites, which consequently compromises privacy, net neutrality, and anonymity.

Full article: http://techrights.org/2020/07/02/ddg-privacy-abuser-in-disguise/

ETA: The bulk of the text in my reply was lifted from a reddit comment. I tried to format my comment to reflect that it's a "quote", alas I've failed. Hence this.

Also, I don't have a card in this game. I understand anonymity and privacy - I dislike intentional deception.

[–] tfowinder@lemmy.ml 57 points 5 months ago (28 children)

What to use them, if not DDG

[–] MrCamel999@programming.dev 20 points 5 months ago (6 children)

I'm currently using searx.be with good results

[–] tfowinder@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Searx improved a lot since I last used it. Was really slow before

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
[–] planish@sh.itjust.works 26 points 5 months ago

Do they "give high rankings" to CloudFlare sites because they just boost up whoever is behind CloudFlare, or because the sites happen to be good search hits, maybe that load quickly, and they don't go in and penalize them for... telling CloudFlare that you would like them to send you the page when you go to the site?

Counting the number of times results for different links are clicked is expected search engine behavior. Recording what search strings are sent from results pages for what other search strings is also probably fine, and because of the way forms and referrers work (the URL of the page you searched from has the old query in it) the page's query will be sent in the referrer by all browsers by default even if the site neither wanted it nor intends to record it. Recording what text is highlighted is weird, but probably not a genuine threat.

The remote favicon fetch design in their browser app was fixed like 4 years ago.

The "accusation" of "fingerprinting" was along the lines of "their site called a canvas function oh no". It's not "fingerprinting" every time someone tries to use a canvas tag.

What exactly is "all data available in my session" when I click on an ad? Is it basically the stuff a site I go to can see anyway? Sounds like it's nothing exciting or some exciting pieces of data would be listed.

This analysis misses the important point that none of this stuff is getting cross-linked to user identities or profiles. The problem with Google isn't that they examine how their search results pages are interacted with in general or that they count Linux users, it's that they keep a log of what everyone individually is searching, specifically. Not doing that sounds "anonymous" to me, even if it isn't Tor-strength anonymity that's resistant to wiretaps.

There's an important difference between "we're trying to not do surveillance capitalism but as a centralized service data still comes to our servers to actually do the service, and we don't boycott all of CloudFlare, AWS, Microsoft, Verizon, and Yahoo", as opposed to "we're building shadow profiles of everyone for us and our 1,437 partners". And I feel like you shouldn't take privacy advice from someone who hosts it unencrypted.

[–] johsny@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Christ on a bicycle.

I just learnt of searx today, any bad news there?

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 months ago

I'm running a search instance on a VPS so my home IP isn't linked to my searches. The main disadvantage is that my VPS is in Toronto and I live 2hrs away so geo searches don't work very well. For instance, if I Google "restaurants" I get results for local restaurants whereas if I Gregle (I named my search engine Gregle) I get results for results near my VPS.

DM me if you want a link to my instance to check it out. It's open but I don't publicize it because bad actors could ruin my IP addresses reputation with spam queries via the API.

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

I recently learned about it, but haven't used it. From what I understand, it's similar to how the fediverse works; individual instances are run by whoever wants to run them. If you run your own instance, you have complete trust in it, but you effectively aren't anonymous (unless you support a whole bunch of users to pool together. If you join someone else's instance, you have to trust them. There's public and private instances.

The other downside is that, like many other small players, they are a metasearch engine, so they rely on the big players like Google and Bing who actually crawl the web for information to index. If Google or Bing want to hide information, that trickles down into metasearch engines, too. It's somewhat buffered by thr fact that your metasearch can look through a whole bunch of different indexes, so you aren't held to one countries censorship, but it probably still has an effect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Babbiorsetto@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Fuck this. Fuck search engines. I'm going back to curated website lists.

[–] datavoid@lemmy.ml 15 points 5 months ago

Webrings ftw

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 19 points 5 months ago

Also as DDG is based in the US it is most likely legally bound to give your informations to any agency with a nice gag order on top of it.

I can't imagine any serious privacy oriented business to be headquartered in the US.

The whole better privacy is true with DDG but certainly not to the extent people would like to think.

That being said DDG has decent search results and is slightly better than Google for privacy. Google is an ecosystem so every little bit you don't give them is a success.

It's really too bad we don't have good private search engines..

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 months ago

Excellent reply. Thank you. Do you have any suggestions for alternatives?

[–] flubo@feddit.de 9 points 5 months ago (10 children)

Thanks for sharing - didnt know. Thats a long list ..... So which search engine is good and privacy friendly then?

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 75 points 5 months ago (3 children)

For many years now, almost the only way to find tech-related answers was to add the word "reddit" to your search. Before the Rexodus ofc.

Nowadays a lot of people go straight to where they wanted to find info - Wikipedia, StackOverflow, IMDB, etc. - and search from there.

Google itself has admitted how bad it has gotten, and in response they decided to voluntarily reduce their profits and return everything back to when it all worked... - no I'm just kidding, they said wait a bit and AI will save us all, somehow (from ourselves?).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 58 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 months ago

That is an amazing read. Thank you!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Owl@hexbear.net 45 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Google search peaked in 2014 - that's when it'd let you do "that movie where [horribly vague summary of an incidental scene]" and get you the answer.

But the complete dropoff started in 2019, when they started letting the ad team remove anti-spam features to game their numbers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I just can’t believe how poor it’s results are

Interesting, as the incredibly poor results are why I am still not using DDG. It's like a worse Bing, and Bing is already terrible.

You are btw correct that Google results have gotten worse. There were studies run that confirmed this. The very same studies found that Bing (and by extension ~all third-party engines) have also gotten worse, and faster so than Google. In other words, search as a whole has gone to shit, which anecdotally matches up with my repeated attempts to swap to DDG every 6-12 months that just result in learning to add !g to every single search, so I might as well skip doing that.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Your take matches my experience perfectly. I always am baffled when people say Google is worse than ddg. I always wanted to use ddg instead, but try as I might, on a literal daily basis, at least 30% ddg results are trash and I have to switch to Google to find whatever I am looking for

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net 32 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Funny fact: google's newest feature is also its best, but it's kinda hidden and might not be available everywhere - it's "web search", which cuts out all the awful bullshit

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Alsjemenou@lemy.nl 30 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Google is great if you want to buy things. It's absolutely shit for information gathering.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 months ago

I'd argue the noise is to a point where it's even shit for buying things.

[–] multifariace@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It used to be great for information if you included reddit in the search terms. Instead of google learning from reddit, reddit is now full of ads and bots. I guess google apps will be complete garbage soon too.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It started when Search Engine Optimisation became a thing, so it's been a while. But it really went downhill a few years ago.

[–] neveraskedforthis@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Don't think any engine is immune to SEO

[–] cmrn@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’ve found Google alternatives great for things that are… filtered (copyright etc), but honestly no matter what search engine I use, I swear none just give you the results for your query anymore. I’ve still been finding the Bing-based ones horrible quality for relevancy and defaulting to Google.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Maybe it's not only a search engine problem, but a content problem. There's less and less useful content on the web nowadays

[–] Baguette@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Ehh I wouldn't say so. There's still plenty of good content around, especially if you're trying to learn. The issue is that there's also a lot of bad content, a lot from garbage ai generated nonsense and a lot from low quality content that plays the seo manipulation game.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

i have the opposite problem. ive aways had to go back to google becasue DDG sucks so hard.. and now i find out its because its bing-based. awesome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fleppensteijn@feddit.nl 19 points 5 months ago (8 children)

I noticed it getting worse over the years. I switched to SearXNG last year when I felt Google was getting really ridiculous.

They started censoring a lot at some point, maybe because they had to, but that's not the only reason.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] BlastboomStrice@mander.xyz 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Hahaha, I ~just came after a search using g**gle due to ddgo being down, I noticed the "web" search is no longer the default (as it was discussed some days ago here).

Google seems to have a huge grip on people and they don't seem to notice (or act against) the terrible services of google search..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dvdnet62@feddit.nl 18 points 5 months ago
[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I've been trying to get used to DDG recently and while I've definitely noticed the decline of Google, that decline has been subtle for me, it hasn't become a disaster, it's just generally frustrating and just not as good as it used to be. But that said, I haven't exactly loved DDG in comparison. It's okay, definitely works, recent outage excepted, but I often found the results kind of needed more work to make use of, they were more kind of, on the topic of what I asked for rather than specifically what I asked within the domain of that topic. It's more like using a search engine as one would have done some 15 or so years ago. Often if trying to find something out I'd be disappointed by the non specific or irrelevant results and get suspicious and try changing back to google for the same thing and found that though they largely contained the same results, Google would have one or two that DDG didn't which were closer to the top of the results and were more specifically about my precise query than just the general topic. I think these tend to be things like forum posts where, if my query is a question, someone's asked basically that exact or very similar question.

I think DDG is mostly working ok enough for me that I'll persevere but I can't say it's been better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaspersgroove@lemm.ee 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It’s been bad for a few years at least but it has gotten even worse recently, I assume due to incorporating AI/LLM’s into the mix.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Google has been this bad since their initial IPO, when they signalled their intent to do this, and should have been stopped to protect the most useful public utility ever invented. Since that day they've been a pimp; the decision to become a pimp led to this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 15 points 5 months ago (6 children)

I don't know, been on Kagi for a year so forgot Google.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Nom@lemm.ee 12 points 5 months ago

alt text

^This is for anyone who doesn't know, click on the web button in the "More" drop down list after making a search to get the old style search results instead of the new ones. People mentioned this in the thread earlier so I thought I'd make it clear.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

Feels like about 6 months or so? If I do an image search it only seems to pull items linking to a retail site. Everything is about sales and I can't find information.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 10 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I think it's been years now. At least a couple of years, I was baffled too back in the day.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago

Google started getting really bad about a year ago

load more comments
view more: next ›