250
submitted 1 year ago by avidamoeba@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

Older millennials, adults aged 35 to 44, had debt-to-disposable income ratios around 250 per cent in 2019, while Freestone noted that metric was roughly 150 per cent for the same age group in 1999.

Can confirm we're sitting around 250% but this is after exercising significant restraint to not take on as much mortgage as the banks would have given us. Everyone I know who bought over the last couple of years went all out and I can't imagine them being any lower than 300-350%.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It isn't just mortgages. I read just a few days ago that the average price of a new car in Canada is $66k. I'm not sure I've spent that much on all of my vehicles combined since I bought my first car at 17. Add in other things bought on financing – lots of our friends have travel trailers, ATVs, and such.

[-] bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

People where I live regularly sell trucks on FB for 60-80K, and they are used with 100,000 km on them

[-] sadreality@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Bidding up used cars during covid was peak bubble behavior

Work trucks costing what a start home used to cost a decade ago

I guess with at truck you work AND live in it

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

I read just a few days ago that the average price of a new car in Canada is $66k.

And a good used bike is $150.

People, we need to start looking for alternatives that won't make rich people richer. Buy a *used *car if you must have a car, but don't keep filling the pockets of these greedy bastards by buying new.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago

I'm super into urbanism and love my bike, but unless there's good bike infrastructure in your area, you're risking your life. I know and keep riding anyways but most people aren't willing to take that risk. What we need to do is organize to push our governments to provide safe infrastructure for all road users.

[-] isosphere@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

i'd settle for more sidewalks in my town

on some streets they just paint a line down the road and call it a sidewalk - one of these is on a road touching an elementary school

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago

I'm super confused, why is everyone bringing up such ridiculous car prices? Both Canada and the US have cheaper cars too. For example a KIA Rio (5 door) is around $17-23k new in Canada. It's $16k in the US.

Are Americans only considering massive SUVs when they talk about new car prices?

[-] jadero@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago

You are talking about least expensive, they were talking about average.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Where are you getting $17K from? According to Kia's website, they start at $19,933. And that's pretty much the cheapest new car in Canada. That's way out of reach for many people, and the used market is insane.

Earlier this year, my 2005 Civic with 301,000km was totaled. I bought it in 2013 for $5,000 with 121,000km. From my research, if I had sold it before it was totalled, I probably could have gotten more than $5,000 for it, even with the extra decade and 180,000km.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

How many Rios do you see on the road for every F-150?

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I see a RAM for every 2 F-150s. 🥲

[-] NightAuthor@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

It was like 12 years ago I was looking at $10k new Kia rio.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Dearche@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Don't forget the cost of insurance, maintenance, fuel, etc. According to TechAltar it costs about half a million euros to own something like a VW Golf at the low end, 1.5M euros on the higher end. It's estimated that the average person spends 30-40% of their lifetime income on their car.

People only see the initial purchase price (which is often ignored because of various deferred payment offers that further increases the price), and the price of gas. Gas alone is starting to reach the price of renting an apartment, yet somehow people still can't see themselves living without a car.

Insane.

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Is it really that expensive to own a car outside of the U.S.? That seems absurd

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

It's that expensive to own a car everywhere. In Canada, it's projected to be >$1K/mo (CAA has a calculator if you want to project your own costs).

The US is no better.

The craziest part, as TechAltar points out in that video, is that society as a whole subsidizes car ownership and if owners actual saw the whole cost through registration fees and gas taxes, that cost would probably be 50% higher.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

It is absurd because those numbers are nonsense. There's a spreadsheet linked in the video description.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Magister@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Some people have good incomes, but cannot anymore changes houses every 5 years because it's out of control, for the price and interest rates, so they use their income to buy cars/RV.

Also some are leasing even if it's like 800$/month just to show their car, I know people who lease big Volvo, Porsche, etc.

Me I keep my 10yo Sonata, and if it dies/crashes, I don't think I'll be able to buy anything more than 15k :-/ What's available for 15k ? a 2006 Sunfire?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MinusPi@pawb.social 38 points 1 year ago

Oh look, things are getting worse again. I'm just numb to it at this point, it's all I've ever really known.

[-] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

I'm already in so much physical pain, might as well lump economic pain in there as well...

[-] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

This is actually a choice. The rich have decided that millennials will suffer so they don't have to. We outnumber them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EddieTee77 22 points 1 year ago

(Seriously sorry for dumb question) What does that mean for us?

[-] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Depends on where you are financially. If you have a fixed rate mortgage that is getting renewed in the next year or two - you'll see a big jump in payments if you aren't able to extend your mortgage.

If you're still on variable, no real change.

If you're renting, rents will continue to climb if interest rates go up or plateau - but don't ever expect prices to come back down, if you're lucky they'll stagnate for a year but that's unlikely because landlords are greedy shits.

Businesses are cutting jobs as there's less money in the market (all going to shelter and food plus general Greed of making less people do the same/more as a larger group), so if you're unfortunate enough to have a mortgage that's renewing soon and you lose your job and EI can't cover the difference, you'll probably have to sell or lose your home... And still be unable to afford rent.

This has been the goal of every level of government for a while, municipalities refused density, provinces refused to prioritize any public housing (Doug in Ontario is sitting on 22 Billion as education, healthcare, and housing are floundering, so he gifts developers billions in prime Greenbelt lands for single detached millionaire homes) and the Feds can't really do much with provincial and municipal governments running interference - aside from use their own central banks to get essentially interest free loans and build federal public housing. Which they should but certainly aren't.

Oh, and the Bank of Canada is crushing developers with interest rates so they're cancelling or pausing projects because they're unprofitable with these interests rates - or they're colluding and holding us over a barrel because our government cannot successfully accomplish anything without overpaying a private business who underpay their workers to do it for them.

If you keep your job and bought a home within your means, it'll be lean times but not impossible to overcome. Don't be afraid to use food banks or anything to keep yourself afloat. Times are tough af and there is little relief on the horizon.

[-] EddieTee77 14 points 1 year ago

This really helps me understand the situation better. I appreciate the time and thought put into this response. It's times like these I am thankful I didn't overspend. I listened to my parents and bought a house that wasn't flashy but was suitable for my situation. Most people I know did not do that, and I constantly wonder how they are making ends meet. Some of them make less than I do.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago

The way I understand it, there are two main implications. First, the higher the debt load, the less people will spend in a rising interest environment. As their (our) mortgage payments go up, we'll spend less on anything else. The larger the effect, the more significant it is for the rest of the economy. Second, the higher the load, the more people will default or sell in a rising interest environment. The consequences of this one are more varied.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sadreality@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Everyone lost their fucking minds and went on bidding spree to buy a house, now the chickens are coming home to roost. I doubt government will be bailing any of these "home owners"

They will those provide financial firms with liquidity so bag holders have someone to sell at a loss.

[-] girlfreddy@mastodon.social 5 points 1 year ago

@sadreality @avidamoeba

Kind of hard to blame the victims here when it's not their fault successive Canadian gov'ts failed to stop illegal money coming into Canada in the 90's -- which, once washed through BC casinos, went straight into property purchases that started the housing bubble we're in now.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If we assume people are capable of making rational decisions and participate in a free market, then they absolutely are to blame for taking on ridiculous debt loads. If we assume the opposite, then their actions were the product of the environment. We seem to want to have it both ways. We want people to be free to do whatever they want without (government) intervention when the number's going up. For example people were really opposed to the introduction of the mortgage stess test. On the other hand we want to absolve people from responsibility and defer to the environment when the number is going down and they're suffering post their earlier decisions. "Why didn't someone do something about X, Y or Z which we perceive is the reason of our suffering."

Personally I do think people's actions are a lot more a product of the environment than anything else. If you ask me, most people shouldn't need to participate in asset markets to have a place to live or have income during retirement. They simply can't compete. But many fellow Canadians don't feel this way, especially when the number goes up. And so we are where we are. 🥲

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 1 year ago

That is the failing of economics and social theories, that people will think and behave in a rational way. People don't think or act rational all the time. I would argue that for many people, we generally act on feelings and emotions.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

I think the government has been whispering to banks to extend amortizations on variable mortgages. They could play with amortizations of distressed fixed mortgages too upon renewal. Keep people in their properties, paying only interest?

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 1 year ago

The banks have started doing "infinity mortgages", in which the lendee only pays the interest and never the principle because of how the interest rats have gone. CTV News did a little primer on infinity mortgages,

When you boil an infinity mortgage down, it sounds like renting since there is no prospect of paying off the principal. Are infinity mortgages here to stay? I don't know, I do know I won't have shocked pickachu face when they stay a fixture of the Canadian mortgage market.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] blindsight@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not sure it's a mistake, tbh. It was a shit sandwich any way you sliced it.

Rentals are being sold out from under people often enough that renting anything privately owned is an eviction lottery.

There are no 3BR apartments available, so families mostly want houses, which are largely privately owned.

At the time, mortgages were cheaper than rent, and interest rates had been dropping fairly steadily for 40 years. We can look back with hindsight and say people should have predicted interest rates quadrupling, but I don't think that's fair.

Sure, people should have known rates would go up, but that's what the extra qualification "stress test" was for, right? (Or, I image something like that was a common refrain.)

I'm house poor and overextended, personally, but I'm fortunate enough to be able to work more than full time to pay it. It sucks, but it's still better than being forced to move my kiddos 4 times in 5 years, like my friend.

Maybe this house will be worth half what we bought it for in a few years, but we gotta live somewhere, and the stability of owning is worth quite a bit.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
250 points (97.3% liked)

Canada

7273 readers
305 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS