this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
78 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37735 readers
304 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 63 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I feel like none of these things are actually new to tech media, or media in general for that matter?

Didn't people worship Steve Jobs, who was literally the marketer, not the guy programming anything?

The number of people who defend Richard Stallman when he says off-color things is high, too.

I'm not even sure cult of personality is always the fault of the personality as much as fanboyism.

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, tech side is irrelevant.

Many people like worshiping prominent figures, and looking up to them for inspiration and socializing with other fans about their adoration and displaying signs of support for them. It's nothing unique to tech.

Kardashians, Trump, Rogan, etc. List is endless in all spaces.

[–] upstream@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Indeed.

Not that it’s my field, but I wouldn’t be shocked if this has a lot to do with the human propensity to fall for religion.

Many humans actually have genetic traits that make them more likely to become religious [citation needed].

I suspect religion is interchangeable.

I recall a research case a decade or so back, where they took a huge Apple fan and showed him Apple logos and products while doing an MRI or something and his brain lit up the same way a religious persons brain would when you show them religious iconography, like a cross.

Some people are simply followers, doesn’t matter what.

Some people like to exploit that, such as Trump and Joe Rogan. Surprised they’re not peddling NFT’s and Crypto.

[–] Mint@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trump was peddling nfts and crypto

[–] upstream@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Good. Seems I blocked enough Trump news not to notice :D

[–] preciouspupp@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Let me drop this quote here:

“Right-wing politics describes the range of political ideologies that view certain social orders and hierarchies as inevitable, natural, normal, or desirable …”

[–] liv@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah ego, dogmatism, and the cult of personality are problems in many fields, I think.

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well its kinda how people (and society) can even function; we are hardwired to look up to role models, and to herd around people and ideas and whatnot... And that's not a bad thing, we evolved to do it for a reason.

It becomes a problem only when you completely stop thinking critically and do stupid shit because of the thing you look up to.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I guess I don't think these people are role models.

They are more like personalities that people liked, and then it snowballed and they became famous because people know their names and they become like a brand.

There are people that dislike mainstream brands, and I think there are people who dislike mainstream influencers also. We are not the same.

There guys don't have any wisdom. They are usually self absorbed people who want attention.

[–] sfera@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You and the person you replied to are both correct. Yet people herded around and followed well known persons through history. Unfortunately people don't always look up to and choose to follow wise people. Yet the kind of hardwiring the person you replied to mentions is obsolete in my opinion. Never before was information as accesibile as today and ideas (no matter what kind) were exchanged as fast as these days. Critical thinking and the ability to filter through all the informational mess is probably the next evolutionary requirement if we wish to avoid becoming drones in a dystopia.

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Who is Ian Cuttress, and why should I watch a 1 hour video on the subject? Does this bring any new facts or perspectives to the table, besides what we already know

[–] troye888@lemmy.one 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He is a pretty respected and known (former)reviewer in the tech industry. Used to be a writer for anandtech for many years, and now does some kine of consulting for tech companies. But most importantly, he personally knows, and as far as i know is respected, by both ltt and gamersnexus.

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh nice, never knew he was previously an anandtech writer. Thanks for the info 👌

[–] freeman@lemmy.pub 3 points 1 year ago

FWIW he says this in the beginning of the video.

[–] tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He was formerly at Anandtech, I think.

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And that means he has interesting things to say?

[–] tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

Well, he knows tech media, and he's generally regarded as a competent tech journalist 🤷‍♂️

[–] eltimablo@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

His deep dives on new chips used the be the highlight of my month when he was writing for them. I haven't seen anything approaching the level of thoroughness he displays anywhere else. He also has either his master's or a PhD in electrical engineering, so he may know a thing or two.

Edit: it's a PhD.

[–] transistor 21 points 1 year ago

This is the problem with everything... not just tech media.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck these guys.

I really dislike YouTube now and influencers the most. Something is wrong with these people in their heads.

[–] J_C___@lemmy.place 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

No, it's actually a comment section for a Youtube video, and it is appropriate to voice an opinion related to it here.

The meme you're parroting fits better when someone goes wildly off-topic, which is not what happened here.

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

https://youtubetranscript.com/?v=Ez9uVSKLYUI

Any AI bot to summarize this. Highly doubt most people are going to want to watch 1.5 hours of this video.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Line Goes Up - The Problem with NFTs was widely praised despite and/or because of its over 2 hour length. I think if the video has a lot to say and says it well, who's to say how much time it should be worth?

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

First time hearing of that video. Is the name drop of that title meant to indicate it was a viral hit or something? Quantities of videos on YouTube are endless and constantly being churned out, so part of why people want some strong selling point when it comes to topics many others have covered and keep covering. Especially during phases when every youtuber seems to be covering the topic to take advantage of the algorithm.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the link. Yeah, just length alone isn't a good reason to dismiss a video since if something is interesting I'll watch it like that NFT video.

More just when it comes to the coverage around LTT it is at the end of the day just some YouTube channel being called out and the PR response getting whole flood of talking heads jumping on the bandwagon. It's one of the topics now that feels so run to the ground for what is gossip or opinion pieces that until there's either more concrete new evidence from within the organization or new content from LTT to talk about it's not the most engaging topic for a long exposé with there being no new revelation to be attention grabbing.

Which is the main reason why for at least just LTT videos the duration was a turn off in the current offerings of LTT focused videos with it being so over saturated. Of course, if it had Linus or anyone from LTT being invited to interviewed then yeah that'd be interesting.

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Also someone please tag me if a summary is posted 🙏

[–] millie@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

I don't want a video of Linus with his tail between his legs. I don't plan on watching any of his videos ever again. I'd rather he and LMG just went away.

Like, why am I going to wait around and hope they improve? They're clearly oversized and toxic. I'm all set. I'm guessing a lot of other people are too.

[–] Paradox 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

cult of personality

[Ian Cutress]

LMAO proving the point

[–] Animortis@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Highlighting that he called out Steve for not asking for comment from LMG for his video.