645
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by rony4102@programming.dev to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

Damn! Team Just do it!!!

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] oleorun@lemmy.fan 58 points 1 year ago

Belle! Stop saying "I do declare" for your constants! It's not valid syntax!

[-] GenXen@hexbear.net 51 points 1 year ago
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 11 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=hkDD03yeLnU&

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[-] CurlyChopz@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

Those 2 things are not fucking related lol

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

yeah they are. it outputs the IP address on a rad spinning dial with Sonic the hedgehog next to it

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

There was a lot wrong with VB but I miss being able to WYSIWYG together basic UIs and get back to Real Coding(tm)

VB was great for learning coding.

Slap some buttons down and have them do math. I made an NPC generator for every RPG I ran in VB as a teen. I felt like I was a hero putting out something that looked "good" for the time.

[-] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 1 year ago

Thanks i hate it

[-] JaddedFauceet@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

joke aside, story point can be quite arbitrary

[-] normalmighty@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

My team has being trying an approach where instead of story pointing, we break everything down into the smallest incremental tasks we reasonably can and use number of tasks overall as the metric instead of story points.

In theory it's meant to be just as accurate on larger projects because the larger than normal and smaller than normal tasks all average out, and it save the whole headache of sitting around and arbitrarily setting points on everything based mostly on gut feeling.

[-] docAvid@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago

I remember reading a study done across some large organizations that showed this approach was more accurate than other estimation techniques. Makes sense to me.

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Huh. That's such a simple and obvious approach, I'm kinda mad I've never thought of it lmao. It seems like you're essentially breaking everything down to a 1 (or as close as you can get it), which is probably a more accurate measurement anyways. Neat.

[-] PixelProf@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

When I teach story points (not in an official Agile Scrum capacity, just as part of a larger course) I emphasize that the points are for conversation and consensus more than actual estimates.

Saying this story is bigger than that one, and why, and seeing people in something like planning poker give drastically differing estimates is a great way to signal that people don't really get the story or some major area wasn't considered. It's a great discussion tool. Then it also gives a really rough ballpark to help the PO reprioritize the next two sprints before planning, but I don't think they should ever be taken too seriously (or else you probably wasted a ton of time trying to be accurate on something you're not going to be accurate on).

Students usually start by using task-hours as their metric, and naturally get pretty granular with tasks. This is for smaller projects - in larger ones, amortizing to just number of tasks is effectively the same as long as it's not chewing away way more time in planning.

[-] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

I'd rather story points than my company's WAG time estimates 🥲

[-] Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Man, this whole thread is like a foreign language to me.

[-] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

Haha they're just different ways of estimating the difficulty of a work task. Story points are a kind of estimate that are represented by a number. The larger the number the more difficult the task.

My company uses WAG (wild ass guess) time estimates where we have to actually say how long we think a task is going to take in a matter of days or weeks. It sounds fine but programming tasks are notoriously hard to estimate since you have to consider so many different factors. I'm especially bad at it so I'd much prefer just saying "this task is an 8 because it seems hard"

[-] JonEFive@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago

It'll take 20 hours. Unless it's harder than I thought. Or it's easier than I thought. Or it's exactly as hard as I thought except there's one little thing that I get stuck on for 5 hours.

[-] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I recently estimated a task to take a couple hours but it ended up taking a week. Hadn't considered having to update a bunch of other teams services with new proto schemas and making sure they were deployed before our own service 🙃

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago

Who's gonna reverse-sort that kanban into a linked list b-tree?

[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Let's also have you do a master rank codewars kata... on the whiteboard. You have 30 minutes.

[-] spez@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

We have been getting pressure from customers whether or not this substring is a palindrome

[-] Vuraniute@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago

SPEZ!!??!?!?!?!?!! WHAT ARE YOU DOING ON LEMMY!?!??! GO BACK TO REDDIT!!!!1!1!11!1!1!1!

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
645 points (98.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

19166 readers
1476 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS