78
It's obvious he doesn't want to be caught in the act of selling all the 'missing' classified docs he's still hiding
And the rest of his traitorous collaborations
So, maybe the government improperly used FISA to spy on Trump’s campaign. Safeguards should be built in to prevent this from happening in the future.
But he acts like they did that with the intent of sabotaging his campaign. It was done to ensure foreign actors weren’t impacting our election. And we didn’t even learn about the bad things that were actually happening until after the elections were over.
Or more accurately, he’s too dumb to know the difference between warrentless searches and warranted raids/wire taps.
While I agree he’s super dumb, I don’t think it’s helpful to point that out. It gives an easy out for people to forgive him.
His comments and actions are intentional and malicious.
The question is. Who told him to say that? Was it putin? Xi? Kim Jong Un? And, what do they have to gain?
¿Porqué no los tres?
Even a broken clock
doing the right thing for the exact wrong reason
I agree with Trump for like the 3rd time ever.
Weird when this happens, broken clock I guess. Why is he even against this?
In his call to “kill FISA,” Trump wrote on Truth Social, “IT WAS ILLEGALLY USED AGAINST ME, AND MANY OTHERS. THEY SPIED ON MY CAMPAIGN!!!”
Oh yeah, his campaign kept talking to Russian agents and shared campaign data with them. Also ironic that he signed this bill when he was president. For once I hope Trump's meddling in the house is successful though.
Can someone ELI5/remind me why Trump got mad about FISA? Just because of the actually legal (and completely warranted) records requests like 4 years ago?
this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
78 points (95.3% liked)
politics
18992 readers
2925 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS