136
submitted 1 month ago by K7d@r.nf to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 55 points 1 month ago

She would have gotten away with far less if she wasn't such an asshat

Ms. Harris, 41, tested the patience of prosecutors and the judge overseeing the case, missing repeated sentencing dates and jeopardizing what otherwise appeared to be a likely path to probation. In August 2022, she pleaded guilty to conspiring to transport the stolen diary to New York, where she met with employees of the group, Project Veritas, and sold it for $40,000 just weeks before the election.

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 month ago

Not even fined the money she made?

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, she also has to pay back her cut of the money.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Crystal Mason should have been allowed to give a victim impact statement

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Had it been one the repuglicans theyd have pushed for years

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

It’s a bit worse than that:

“The judge also sentenced her to three years’ probation, along with three months of home confinement, and ordered her to pay back the money ($20,000) she earned from the sale.”

this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
136 points (97.9% liked)

politics

17851 readers
2711 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS