this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
251 points (98.8% liked)

News

36943 readers
2266 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A crusading Brazilian Supreme Court justice included Elon Musk as a target in an ongoing investigation over the dissemination of fake news and opened a separate investigation late Sunday into the executive for alleged obstruction.

In his decision, Justice Alexandre de Moraes noted that Musk on Saturday began waging a public “disinformation campaign” regarding the top court’s actions, and that Musk continued the following day — most notably with comments that his social media company X would cease to comply with the court’s orders to block certain accounts. 

“The flagrant conduct of obstruction of Brazilian justice, incitement of crime, the public threat of disobedience of court orders and future lack of cooperation from the platform are facts that disrespect the sovereignty of Brazil,” de Moraes wrote.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I do wonder if Elon is aware that the world is generally tired of him and starting to take action from things like this story, to individual consumers avoiding his cars due to his name being attached to them? He might be in a fan boi bubble and thinks he is worshiped by all still. Hard to say.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I don't think he believes he needs to care, and if his value wasn't tied up in Tesla I don't think he would. But maybe he has an exit plan from that too.

[–] root_beer@midwest.social 4 points 2 years ago

He absolutely has an echo chamber of bazingas singing his praises and showing off AI art portraying him as superhero, philosopher king, decent father, and benevolent captain of industry. Some are real, incl. Ian Miles “Ant Man” Cheong, the Krassenstein grifters, jilted ex-lover and spaghetti aficionado Grimes; but then lots of them are clearly bots, and some, I assume, are sockpuppet accounts run by the Boer himself.

[–] JoMomma@lemm.ee 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wish the US courts had to integrity to do the same

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

Funny that Brazil, a country known for its corruption, it calling musk out. Good for them, helps revitalize their image. Now if other countries could follow along.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Why do I have the feeling if this goes far enough that Musk won't be able to legally enter Brazil anymore, and therefore harm tesla and his other companies at the same time by not being able to perform business there anymore?

[–] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

most notably with comments that his social media company X would cease to comply with the court’s orders to block certain accounts. 

I mean, he can do that, but the flip side is that that may entail not doing business in Brazil.

Honestly, I think that it'd make more sense to just block content from being viewed on a per-jurisdiction basis and when someone can't see content, indicate why they're blocked, say that their state is mandating it.

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

It's not about the technicalities of implementing these rulings, it's about not wanting to do so, specifically because Elon agrees with the far right extremism being censored here.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Elon Musk responds with great certainty in his voice: These accusations are completely baseless, I have NEVER obstructed fake news.

[–] root_beer@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago

How long until Grok shifts focus from fake stories about Iran to fake stories about Brazil?