359
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] elvith@feddit.de 62 points 3 months ago

Obviously the way to go is to leak them in a forum of an online game so your favorite tank gets implemented in the game...

[-] runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 3 months ago

WAR THUNDER forums try not to leak classified information for 10 minutes CHALLENGE: (IMPOSSIBLE!).

[-] psmgx@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

The best part about the warthunder thing is that it just keeps happening.

Like, guys, we talked about this TWICE already, comeon!

[-] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Even more than twice by now

[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 29 points 3 months ago

Obvious solution: revoke security clearance of all air force personnel.

Oh you're a pilot who needs to know what you're bombing today? Don't worry you will have a corporal from the army assigned to you. While you're in the air he will be in direct contact with you. Corporal Crayon will be looking at the map and tell you where to turn when you need it, and will be the one to tell you when to release the payload.

[-] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago

“I duct-taped your windows, now the lights on your HUD wolnt give your position away!”

[-] psmgx@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

No shit the Soviets tried something like that for a while

[-] MyPornViewingAccount@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I can assure you that trying to get Corporal Crayon flying his MQ-1C to drop a hellfire on baddies in direct contact with friendlies makes you want to gouge out Cpl Crayon's eyes.

[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 3 points 3 months ago

Don't worry, Cpl Crayon, under the leadership of Captain Crayola, is highly skilled amd very motivated. He's only being given the best supplies: the red ones

[-] germanatlas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 3 months ago
[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You know what's worse than a credible defense post in NCD?

A noncredible post, trying to use credible information, only to be unintentionally noncredible.

Since when is some dickhead in a New England air reserve unit, a member of the USAF?

[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Doesn't that just make it worse?

[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Doesn't anyone do it just to watch the world burn anymore?

shakes head

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That's the option on the right, isn't it?

[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No, I don't mean the ones that disrupt the system for power, gravitas, or infamy, I mean doing it for the carnage itself, for the pretty flames their disruption makes, breaking the pathetic illusion of civilization.

The dreamers.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago

The espionage methods of KGB during the cold war should have been warning enough that twenty-year-olds with loneliness problems and confidence problems will present a security risk.

To be fair, lonely, insecure forty-year-old present a security risk as well.

[-] Xariphon@kbin.social 1 points 3 months ago

I'm out of the loop; what happened??

[-] OttoVonNoob@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

67 year old, leaked Military secrets "to impress" a female spy.. Also a 20 something year old leaked military secrets to impress a discord server...

[-] Xariphon@kbin.social 1 points 3 months ago

I'm out of the loop; what happened??

[-] Xariphon@kbin.social 1 points 3 months ago

I'm out of the loop; what happened??

this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
359 points (96.9% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6016 readers
512 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Random twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Low Hanging Fruit thread.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. These include Social media screenshots with a title punchline / no punchline, recent (after the start of the Ukraine War) reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Low effort thread instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS