37
George Galloway wins sweeping victory in Rochdale byelection, saying ‘this is for Gaza’ (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 7 months ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FatLegTed@feddit.uk 19 points 7 months ago

Galloway is only interested in promoting himself. He'll always pick the side that will get him the most publicity. Be it IRA, Saddam Hussein, Syria or Palestine.

If everyone was wearing hats, he wouldn't. Just to look different and stand out.

Disgusting specimen.

[-] nimmo@lem.nimmog.uk 12 points 7 months ago

I vaguely remembered a quote about him saying he was impressed with Saddam Hussein's indefatigably.

After going to look it up just there to confirm it was him that said it I saw more of the context around it:

Sir, I salute your courage, your strength, your indefatigability, and I want you to know that we are with you, hatta al-nasr, hatta al-nasr, hatta al-Quds until victory, until victory, until Jerusalem. (https://en.m.wikiquote.org/wiki/George_Galloway)

So whilst I agree that he's out for himself and not someone that I particularly care for, he does seem to have had an interest in that part of the world for the last 30 years or so. This isn't quite the out of the blue political opportunism that some people seem to be suggesting it is.

[-] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 1 points 7 months ago

Yes it's not out of the blue, he's been a political opportunist for a very long time. The precise type of opportunism depends on exactly which minority lives in whichever by-election constitency he's rolled into most recently.

[-] PatMustard@feddit.uk 8 points 7 months ago

Is it bad if someone does something good for selfish reasons? Sure it would be nice if everyone was a paragon of virtue but I'd rather have a smarmy prick trying to stop wars because it strokes his ego than a smooth-taking establishment-backer who won't change the status quo in case it hurts the economy.

[-] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 8 points 7 months ago

Guys, being against a war is pro-Sadam Hussein now. Oh BTW that war went really really badly and he was vindicated in the end, but fuck him for trying to stop a conflict that killed over a million civilians.

[-] flamingos@ukfli.uk 0 points 7 months ago

He did more than oppose the Iraq war, he was very friendly to the Hussein regime and made regular trips to the region, he even had lunch with the foreign minister.

[-] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 6 points 7 months ago

He claimed that he wears a hat following a hammer attack which left him hospitalised and severely scarred.

[-] baggins@beehaw.org -3 points 7 months ago

He could wear a syrup, but that unless it was a Ronald McDonald type, he wouldn't stand out. A champagne socialist like him could even afford hair transplants.

[-] Tweak@feddit.uk 5 points 7 months ago

Starmer’s party also faced a challenge from another former Labour MP in the form of Simon Danczuk, who was suspended from the party in 2015 after sending inappropriate messages to a teenager. Danczuk, Rochdale’s MP from 2010 to 2017, was standing for Reform UK, the anti-immigration party founded by Nigel Farage.

Reform had fewer votes than the Lib Dem's, that's barely a challenge.

Will this seat be up for re-election during the upcoming General Election, or does it get a pass for being so recent?

[-] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

It will be up for re-election, so hopefully this grifter won't be there long.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 7 months ago

Actually the fact that he won't be there long is why labor wasn't massively bothered about removing support. Sure it wasn't great, but it also won't really make any difference in the long run.

[-] steeznson@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

What a mess this by-election has been. Rochdale can't catch a break.

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 4 points 7 months ago

Imagine if he joins forces with Corbyn and brings back Livingston. A proper Workers Against Neoliberale Kleptocrats Electing Radical Socialism party! Starmer would be worried then!

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz -3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Legend.

Good news for once.

this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
37 points (97.4% liked)

UK Politics

3036 readers
175 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
tom@feddit.uk
GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
flamingos@feddit.uk