171
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] taladar@sh.itjust.works 24 points 8 months ago

It becomes increasingly clear that internal combustion engines are simply not capable of having the kind of low emissions that a continued use of them would require, no matter what corporate propaganda would like to spread about them.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I think there are still some relatively niche use-cases for them left. Specifically, if you're using sufficiently few of them and/or using them in sufficiently rural areas, then all of the polluting outputs other than greenhouse gases become less of an issue, and if you're running them on 100% biofuels, then they can be carbon-neutral. (Also, since vegetable oil doesn't contain sulfur to begin with, an engine running on biodiesel emits zero SO~x~, which is nice.)

In other words, replacing the cars and trucks that can reasonably be replaced with bicycles, trains, and electric automobiles (ranked from best idea to worst, by the way) is good enough; we don't have to be perfectionist about it.

[-] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

And at that point it probably doesn't make economical sense to keep producing them.

[-] willya@lemmyf.uk 22 points 8 months ago

Always a douchebag in these trucks too.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I have honestly never seen someone who brags about a Cummins who isn't a douchebag. I have several truck friends, all of them agree Cummins is reserved for redneck douchebags.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 21 points 8 months ago

The company has seen no evidence that anyone acted in bad faith and does not admit wrongdoing

I supposed the software bypasses just "accidentally" got committed and applied then. I suppose they just plum forgot to remove the

if (emissionsCheckFailed)
{
  emissionCheckFailed = false;
}
[-] Pistcow@lemm.ee 17 points 8 months ago

At this point I'm sure everyone has cheated and surprised they don't go back to sniffers instead of OBD.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 8 months ago

Mercedes, VW and pretty much the rest of them cheated the sniffers by putting it in a clean mode when it was on the rolling road (probably by testing suspension travel and steering angles in the traction control software/hardware). They caught VW first with a mobile sniffer test under normal driving. Since then they found Volvo, Renault, Jeep and a bunch of others are doing similar bullshit.

Clean mode probably cut the power output in half and would have made them drive like the non-turbo diesels of yore.

Disclaimer: I’m actually a car enthusiast/nerd, but I’d like to see cars become the opposite of how bikes are used in my area. Weekend hobbies that are used for enjoyment or maybe to go traveling out of the reach of infrastructure. Not to slog to an office everyday in 4000lbs of hydrocarbon powered metal.

[-] Pistcow@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

That's super informative and I didn't realize it was that technical. Thanks fren!

[-] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago

Op forgot to add 'only ' after 'Fined '

this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
171 points (97.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

9770 readers
37 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS