579
submitted 10 months ago by TrivialBetaState@sopuli.xyz to c/linux@lemmy.ml

I found this ad from Personal Computer World (UK) in 1985. I think we all like their moto! Has anyone heard of this company? They don't seem to be still around from an internet search I did. But people who worked there may have had an interesting career (hopefully!)

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Deeyess20@kbin.social 77 points 10 months ago

I like it. Similarly, licensing closed source commercial software is much like leasing or renting. You rely on the vendor to do maintenance, fix issues, and provide support. SaaS is like staying at a hotel.

[-] TrivialBetaState@sopuli.xyz 16 points 10 months ago

That's a fantastic description!

[-] KrokanteBamischijf@feddit.nl 15 points 10 months ago

You can do both though. Lots of high-profile software is both open source and available as SaaS.

The beauty of that strategy is you can ensure the software will survive your service provider going bankrupt or otherwise suddenly disappearing, leaving you without a solution.

By not being locked into a specific vendor, competition will be centered around providing the best service, which is in my opinion exactly as it should be.

[-] Ramin_HAL9001@lemmy.ml 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Applications without source code don't exist.

Oh, they meant, "you should have the source code to the applications you use." Well in that case, good call on them.

[-] erwan@lemmy.ml 25 points 10 months ago

Yes unfortunately they do.

In the 90's I wrote some Visual Basic applications, the only source code they had was isolated snippets to describe the buttons actions.

But most of the app was not based in source code but directly on a binary formal that VB could understand.

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 31 points 10 months ago

That said people who use buildings typically don't have or need the blueprints to said buildings

[-] TrivialBetaState@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago

This appears to be true on the surface but is not accurate. I am a structural engineer and when people need to do something with their buildings, the engineers (structural, mechanical, fire, etc.) and the architects need the plans or at least a survey. If a side has the plans and the authority on the plans, that side has huge leverage over the building. Fortunately, this is never the case with buildings. Plans are considered public information. It would be so much better if the same applied to software.

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Oh interesting I didn't know that that's pretty cool

Open source buildings

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 10 months ago

EA

Today's EA is quiet opposite lol(Electronic Arts)

[-] Tolstoshev@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I’m old enough to remember when they were good. I still play Mule every so often.

[-] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 2 points 10 months ago

Not sure if this is clear to everyone, but these are two different companies abbreviated as “EA”

[-] pglpm@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 10 months ago

Thank you for finding this gem!

[-] theodewere@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago

if it was in PC World, it might be likely they were business data applications..

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
579 points (98.8% liked)

Linux

45578 readers
807 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS