440
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Law enforcement officers in Kansas raided the office of a local newspaper and a journalist's home on Friday, prompting outrage over what First Amendment experts are calling a likely violation of federal law.

The police department in Marion, Kansas — a town of about 2,000 — raided the Marion County Record under a search warrant signed by a county judge. Officers confiscated computers, cellphones, reporting materials and other items essential to the weekly paper's operations.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CaptainHowdy@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago

This is probably one of the most important (legally and politically speaking) events to happen in the U.S. this year, but I feel like it will not get very much attention at all and might set a very dangerous precedent going into the next decade.

[-] Gutless2615@ttrpg.network 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And the 98 year old woman whose house they raided just died on Saturday.

[-] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Did you mean “razed”?

And yes, it’s awful.

[-] macarthur_park@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

They likely meant “raided”

[-] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh, yes you are probably right. My mistake.

[-] cowfodder@unilem.org 3 points 1 year ago
[-] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Thank you. Pre-coffee reading comprehension issues here.

[-] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago

Stories about police abusing their authority and breaking the law have become like stories about mass shootings. They happen constantly, everyone wrings their hands, but no one is willing to actually do anything about the problem.

[-] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It's what the poorly titled "Defund the Police" movement was/is about. The police serve no other purpose than to harass people and enforce the will of rich and politicians. So they need to be vastly scaled back.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

So they need to be vastly scaled back.

Unfortunately, we elected a president who pledged to raise their funding. They're not only corrupt, violent, and out of control, they're getting rewarded for it.

[-] StarServal@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

Local authorities said they were investigating the newsroom for "identity theft," according to the warrant. The raid was linked to alleged violations of a local restaurant owner's privacy, when journalists obtained information about her driving record.

Oberlander said exceptions to the Privacy Protection Act are "important but very limited." One such exception allows authorities to raid a newsroom if the journalists themselves are suspected to be involved in the crime at hand. In a statement sent to NPR, Marion Police Chief Gideon Cody cited this exception to justify his department's raid of the Marion County Record.

However

Several media law experts told NPR the raid appears to be a violation of federal law, which protects journalists from this type of action.

[-] Pandantic@midwest.social 30 points 1 year ago

Meyer, the Marion County Record's publisher, said local restaurateur Kari Newell accused the paper of illegally obtaining drunk-driving records about her.

But the paper, Meyer said, received this information about Newell from a separate source, independently verified it on the Kansas Department of Revenue's Division of Vehicles website — and decided not to publish it. The paper instead opted to notify local police.

Here’s their justification - they found out about a business owner’s drunk driving records, and told the police. The police decided this was “identity theft”.

[-] introvrt2themax@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A bit of cherry picking there

But Oberlander said that exception doesn't apply when the alleged crime is connected to newsgathering — which appears to be the case in Marion.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

While this is otherwise pretty great reporting, I found this sentence incredibly weird

Without the devices, she was left unable to stream shows onto her TV or use devices if she needed help, the newspaper said.

One of those things is significantly more important than the other, since she died shortly after this raid. Just a weird sentence overall.

[-] fear@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Not that weird if we're talking about the quality of life of a 98 year old woman. "Healthy" at that age might look like spending a great deal of time in your favorite chair watching your favorite shows on the television. After almost a century on this planet, you get a little tired.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

That's a good point! Hadn't considered it.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

"If I can't watch Andy Griffith this life ain't worth livin."

[-] malloc@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

In America, there’s big city police. Then there is rural county police. The latter have the potential to get away with so much blatant violation of local/state/federal law. Checks and balances of power is nonexistent.

Doesn’t help that journalists and local newspapers have either vacated the region or bought by some VC/PE or larger media organization which guts the IJ division

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
440 points (99.3% liked)

News

23322 readers
4387 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS