287
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MdRuckus@lemmy.world 169 points 1 year ago

What the hell is wrong with republicans? Don't pay your taxes and you should be killed. Rape a 12 year old and you get to be a daddy. This is messed up.

[-] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am European. I seriously can't understand why USA conservatives (referring strictly to republicans in this case) are so extremely regressive to the point of hurting themself.

I feel like much of their talk is influencing bad ideas here too.

[-] cassetti@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago

It begs the question - were they always thinking this stuff and now feel entitled to say it out loud? Or are they being coaxed by propaganda generated by some of our nations enemies in order to break apart our country? Is this all one big state-sponsored psy-ops attack by a foreign country?

I don't know. But it sure as hell scares the hell out of me.

[-] kobra@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

It’s both.

[-] trafguy@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I agree with kobra. It's a mix. The Alt Right Playbook video series gives some interesting thoughts on the matter. Conservatives and further right tend to be hyper hierarchical and tend to demand respect for the chain of authority, even to their own detriment (as long as it hurts someone else more). Rejecting an authority figure is a bigger deal on the right than the left due to the whole "control how people think" angle.

So it hasn't gone far enough to alienate the ones that are still on board. Some refuse to hear the negative and just bury their head in the sand. Some are convinced by emotionally charged rhetoric that "the other side is even worse." And some already agreed with them secretly. For most, it's probably a mix of these various techniques for contorting to fit the shape demanded of them by their authority figures--some being more bigoted than others after all. For the pro-hierarchical people, their place in the hierarchy is a piece of their self-identity and it's really hard to fight that instinct.

[-] Asafum@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's propaganda meant to put the stooges for the ultra wealthy in power so I wouldn't be surprised to see it elsewhere in the world. They have NO policies other than "cut expenditures for the wealthy" (taxes, regulations, etc) so they have to use propaganda outlets to foment a culture war that they can then "fight for you" to get your vote.

I do have hard feelings for those that succumb to the propaganda as they have to want some of these hateful things, but I REALLY LOATHE the propagandists. There is no word in the English language that properly conveys just how much hatred I have for them, people like Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson. I don't like to wish death on anyone, but god would the world be a better place without them and people like them.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I am European. I seriously can’t understand why USA conservatives (referring strictly to republicans in this case) are so extremely regressive to the point of hurting themself.

Because Trump ushered in an era where the only "strong" Republican is one willing to hurt "Others". One who never apologizes when they're wrong, but instead doubles down. One who is willing to step on whoever it takes to get to the top, especially if the people being stepped on are "them".

The entire party is all Trump all the time, and the only way to survive in today's GOP is to either (a) Be Trump, or (b) be willing to openly ratchet up the cruelty. And while I disagree with people like Liz Cheney on just about every policy issue in existence, she at least tried to bring the GOP back to what it was before Trump, and look what happened to her and others who tried to do the same thing.

These Republicans are so regressive to the point of self-sabotage because the MAGA base is still large enough to dictate their political careers and they'll accept nothing less. MAGA may only be a portion of the GOP voting base, but that portion is large enough where it's nearly impossible for a Republican to win without them.

[-] FinalBoy1975@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It's not all that different from some far-right political parties in European countries. Vox in Spain, for example, has nostalgia for the Franco regime and would just love to nullify people's divorces. I mean, talk about extremely regressive. How about Italy's extreme right-wing party? They successfully nullified some adoptions. Those are two examples I know from Europe, but I think there are other European countries with extremist political parties that are gaining traction.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because they think it makes them look "tough" in front of other like-minded idiots. Thats the thing they care most about. Not compassion, or equality, or anything like actual fairness...just trying to look "tough".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Razputinsgirth@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

The genuinely treat the constitution as a religious document akin to the Bible. The writer have thought of everything and made room for everything. Btw slaves were totally cool cause they were loved by their owners. This is what I gather from hearing my family speak

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Toribor@corndog.uk 14 points 1 year ago

Don’t pay your taxes and you should be killed.

Only if you're a democrat. If you're a republican then not paying your taxes is patriotic and supportive of 'small government'.

[-] cultsuperstar@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Well Trump said way back that not paying taxes made him a smart businessman. So he essentially acknowledged not paying taxes, but there was no real investigation into that and Republicans and supporters agreed he was smart for not paying taxes.

[-] Dragonmind@lemm.ee 79 points 1 year ago

Can we not inflate his bullshit on this new site though? Like... This is just him saying whatever random stuff to stay in people's minds. There's no meaning behind it and there's no action either. It's just actual clogging up of more important politics and news.

[-] GiddyGap@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, the guy is the leading contender for the Republican nomination for President. It's important that people (especially independent voters) know about this crap before they consider voting for him.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

That is why we have a down vote option which I highly recommend using for items such as this. The community controls what it wants to see.

[-] trafguy@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It isn't exactly a matter of wanting or not wanting to see it. You know the addage "any news is good news?" By posting content that keeps a person and their commentary in the forefront of people's minds, that person gains an audience. That audience will contain people who can be swayed by the snake oil, but who would otherwise be reasonable. Or in short, posting their content facilitates radicalization.

That said, while content from harmful influential people needs to be approached with caution, I don't see this as promoting Trump's action/behaviors. To me it reads more like a "not the onion" headline. I'd be disappointed if anyone felt that the death penalty was warranted for late tax filing, but I suppose it's possible.

Does Lemmy have a way to filter keywords? It would be helpful for people to be able to blacklist keywords so a user could choose to avoid seeing, for example, news about Trump or content with sensitive topics.

[-] mystik@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

We need that slashdot system of vote + mark "insightful", "flamebait", "funny", etc etc. add more categories as necessary so posts can be scored on multiple axes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
[-] imallamabanana@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not a trump supporter but I'm also not a sensationalism supporter. He made an analogy in his post, "he gave out a traffic ticket instead of a death sentence." Now we accept that the sentence given by the judge was not a traffic ticket, but we insist that the death sentence part was meant literally? Now honestly, I hate Trump as much as anyone but honest, accurate, and irrefutable criticisms are going to get us farther than stretches of sensational word-twisting.

[-] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

The problem here is there's a sub-group of Trump supporters who will read this and think "yeah, someone should just take out Hunter Biden, that will send a real message". And there's a sub-group of that group that will possibly try to do it.

Trump is well aware, and possibly proud of, the fact that statements from him can lead to real world violence.

He was trying to get the metal detectors removed from the Jan 6 rally because "they're not here to hurt me". This indicates he knew people would try to come armed and that they intended to hurt someone, just not him.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Trump is well aware, and possibly proud of, the fact that statements from him can lead to real world violence.

There's no "possibly". He is proud of it, and he's attempted to directly call for violence on multiple occasions since 1/6. Fortunately, it only actually worked the one time. But it did permanently force everybody to take his calls to violence seriously since he only needs one well-armed MAGA moron to do some serious damage, and his base has proven that there are plenty of people out there waiting for that call.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

He speaks far too colloquially and off-the-cuff for a President for my liking. A complete buffoon who can't speak unless it's in hyperbole.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

While I get what you're saying, Trump benefits far too much from not literally saying things, but letting his supporters run wild with what he's implying.

It's no different from when he starts a rumor by saying "People have been telling me..." followed by some shit he just made up about an opponent. He gets to claim immunity from being the one that starts the rumor while at the same time putting it out there for his supporters to grab onto.

The question is, do you believe that he wants his supporters to think he literally wants the death penalty for Hunter Biden?

If the answer is yes, then he shouldn't be defended in any way.

[-] keeb420@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

im well past giving this gaping void of humanity the benefit of the doubt.

[-] yata@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Of course he deliberately mentioned the death sentence to put associations into the skulls of his radicalised extremist cultist base. Haven't you been alive for the last 7 years?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

Trump should be instantly held to the same standards he wants others held to

[-] Fonchote@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

He should be, but knows he won't. His base loves him for it.

[-] fylkenny@feddit.de 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That wouldnt be the first law he created that bites himself afterwards.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't Trump be first in line if that was the law? That fucker broken more tax laws than anyone. Not to mention being fucking traitor to the country when stole classified documents to sale to the highest bidder. That warrants the death penalty.

[-] SeaOtter@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 year ago

That’s ironic

[-] topRamen@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

I can't believe people still get upset over what trump says. The dude was literally created to piss people off and divide us. Just ignore it, you getting upset is exaxtly what they want. I don't understand how people don't get that in 2023.

[-] WheeGeetheCat@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

But when Trump doesn't pay his taxes it's because hes 'a smart businessman'.

Someone get his rambling on the books as law, then we can prosecute him under his own laws like we're doing with the mishandling of classified information.

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

Ok. At this point he HAS to be doing this shit on purpose.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

He says whatever he thinks will own the libs. He doesn't have any actual platform, it is all about power for him and hurting those who hurt him.

[-] cassetti@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Yep, he's grasping at straws to stay relevant. If there's one thing he knows, it's how to manipulate the media. And right now the only way he can get their attention to post what he says, is if he says something truly outlandish and more "trumpy" than other political commentators from conservative outlets.

[-] aessedai@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Speaking to the fringe is a tactic to win primary support. It's only occasionally hurt him in a real sense so it's effectively reinforced.

[-] Lukecis@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Damn, there'd be quite a lot less millionaires and billionaires in the world if that was the case, lmao.

[-] teuast@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

i don't see a problem with that

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
287 points (78.8% liked)

politics

18157 readers
3131 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS