More Republicans back spending on child care, saying it's an economic issue (www.independent.co.uk)

submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

More Republican lawmakers in states around the U.S. are getting behind the idea of using taxpayer money to subsidize child care

Like a lot of mothers, North Dakota state Rep. Emily O'Brien struggled to find infant care when her daughter Lennon was born in 2019. So O'Brien, a Republican who represents the Grand Forks region, brought Lennon along to meetings with local leaders and constituents.

O'Brien had her second daughter, Jolene, in 2022, not long before legislators were due to meet. Wanting more time to bond before returning to work, O'Brien brought the newborn with her to Bismarck, where she snoozed through Gov. Doug Burgum's State of the State address on her mother's desk.

Not long after, O'Brien persuaded her colleagues to back a plan to invest $66 million in child care, an unprecedented sum for a state that had, like others with Republican leadership, long resisted such spending. But O'Brien argued it could help the state's workforce shortage by helping more parents go to work and attracting new families to the state.

“It was definitely not, you know, an easy sell, because this is probably somewhere where you don’t want the government to get involved,” O'Brien said. “But it’s a workforce solution. We have people that are willing and able to work, but finding child care was an obstacle.”

all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] teft@lemmy.world 67 points 9 months ago

Ah the classic republican “not a problem until it happens to me”.

[-] flathead@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago

Subsidizing daycare vs better wages for working parents. Sounds like a plan.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

her daughter Lennon

Why the fuck would you name your daughter Lennon?

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Origins include Irish Ó Leannáin ("descendant of Lover (leannán)") and from Ó Lionáin ("descendant of Blackbird (Lonán)")

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lennon_(name)

Because it’s a name? Anglicised from Irish.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

*Lenin

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Now, as that aid dries up, Republican state lawmakers across the country are embracing plans to support child care — and even making it central to their policy agendas.

In Vermont, Democratic state lawmakers overrode a Republican governor's veto to pass a payroll tax hike to fund child care subsidies.

In Missouri, Senate President Pro Tem Caleb Rowden, a Republican, said he hoped the Statehouse would focus less on culture war issues — like criminalizing drag shows and censoring library books — and more on expanding access to child care and school choice.

Two years ago, an Idaho state lawmaker apologized after he opposed federal early childhood money because it encouraged women to “ come out of the home and let others raise their children.”

One of the strongest proponents is the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation, which surveyed a dozen states and estimated they lost billions of dollars in economic activity because of child care gaps.

“The one thing … that I’m not wiling to do is to directly subsidize child care for families,” Noem recently told KWAT News in Watertown, South Dakota.

The original article contains 1,090 words, the summary contains 184 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] brothershamus@kbin.social -2 points 9 months ago

Cackling bags of evil jelly agree to let everyone smell the cake coming out of the oven. Film at 11.

this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024

94 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19090 readers

3397 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News