214

Oklahoma lawmaker Dusty Deevers is a Christian nationalist who believes the government should “terrorize evildoers.”

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 9 months ago

This guy's browser history gotta be a wild ride.

[-] Gameskrub@kbin.social 19 points 9 months ago

I guarantee he has child porn on any of his computers.

[-] Tristaniopsis@aussie.zone 48 points 9 months ago

I’ll put $100 down right now, that in less than 5 years this guy is caught doing some sexual thing that goes against everything he preaches, even if it’s not actually icky by anyone else’s normal standards.

[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago

you'll get your money

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 41 points 9 months ago

This guy fucks kids and has a baby shoe collection.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago

I assume he will have no problem showing us his browser history...

[-] Steve@startrek.website 10 points 9 months ago
[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 22 points 9 months ago

Heard about this from Hemant Mehta. This guy is filling these wishful bill proposals knowing they are too extreme and that they won't pass even in Oklahoma. So instead of, I dunno, working on legislation to help literally anyone in his state, he's doing the congressional equivalent of trying to look busy.

And make no mistake, he would likely love to see some of these passed into law, he just doesn't care enough to try to break the system so that they could.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

He's a congressional troll on the state level. No different from Boebert or Greene. Accomplish nothing but make a lot of noise. Basically the opposite of Republican hero Teddy Roosevelt.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

Isn’t that what they said about abortion legislation?

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 5 points 9 months ago

Yep! You're thinking of the recent Tennessee story, except that one unfortunately passed.

[-] Leviathan@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

This dude for sure hires male prostitutes and blames it on his porn addiction.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 20 points 9 months ago

And so i ask, what then shall we do to mister deevers once he's found with a 14 year old's mouth around his cock?

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 9 months ago

You got the roles reversed.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

“promote what is good in accordance with the will of God.”

I guarantee this dude wouldn't know God's will if it's big wet mushroom tip smacked him in the face.

[-] Unlocalhost@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Wait someone tell me what did Christ die for again?

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 13 points 9 months ago

So that we could have unlimited sins.

[-] Default_Defect@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago

Sins, unlimited sins, but no sins.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

Lower taxes?

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago

He’d be imprisoning a large portion of his voter base.

[-] flipht@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

The beauty of the panopticon and the surveillance state is that everyone breaks some law some time. So you just have to wait until you hate someone enough to notice them, find out what they did, and off they go to become slave labor.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

This is sad and true. :-(

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago

And I want to jail people for getting in the up elevator when they are really going down and double their sentences if they say, "I'll just go for a ride" like a blithering idiot.

I think we are probably on par with achieving our dreams.

[-] Stretch2m@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

"I'll take the scenic route." LOL

[-] PopMyCop@iusearchlinux.fyi 5 points 9 months ago

Deever: The bifurcation of the urine stream as it exits the male urethra.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


In Deevers’ view, civil society, apart from the influence of overt Christian doctrine, is not a neutral middle ground, but rather the realm of the devil, or what he calls “a serpentine theocracy.”

But when Deevers opens his mouth, he invariably presents a jarring, black-and-white view of the role of government — which he believes exists to “protect innocent people and to punish and terrorize evildoers.”

While campaigning, Deevers told a religious podcast he also favors “public shaming for those who are at fault in divorce.” (In a related essay, he calls this “an important act of justice for both the transgressor and the transgressed.”)

Deevers embodies a threat that experts believe Christian nationalism poses to democracy — by literally demonizing his opponents, and casting compromise as moral corruption.

As Brad Onishi, author of an “Extremist History of Christian Nationalism,” recently described in an interview with Rolling Stone: “If you’re a person who is convinced that the United States is under threat by a Luciferian regime, comprised of Marxist globalist secularists, feminists, the LGBTQ community, and so on, democracy is not your sacred value.”

Pitching himself to voters, Deevers filmed a campaign ad wielding a rifle while wearing a black T-shirt that read: “Obey God: Defy Tyrants.” He railed against “the Godless leftist agenda” that he warned threatens “thriving families and their moral development.” He additionally decried “drag queen story hour” and the “chemical and surgical mutilation of our kids.” A longtime opponent of abortion, Deevers positioned this stance in biblical terms as “loving my pre-born neighbor as myself.”


The original article contains 1,420 words, the summary contains 259 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Sounds like he needs to be hunted down by freedom-loving Americans

this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
214 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19170 readers
4285 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS