497
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by sparr@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

People often ask why I contribute to open source projects or otherwise work on building automated tooling. They see me spending hours to automate a task or fix a bug that take seconds to do or avoid manually, in a way that the original XKCD comic says won't pay off. The disconnect seems to be that the comic and those people only consider time it saves me, not time it saves the tens to thousands to millions of other people who will use the script or patch or whatever when I publish it. So, here's a version of xkcd.com/1205 updated for making decisions that benefit a thousand people instead of just one.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 82 points 5 months ago

I'm just trying to think of anything that I do 50x a day that takes five minutes.

[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 147 points 5 months ago

Not since I was a teenager.

[-] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Leave my mom out of this.

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

How many things does anyone do 50x a day, period? Apart from autonomic body functions I can't think of anything. I probably don't even stand up 50 times a day.

[-] ptrknvk@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

Sending emails, opening files, checking the database. Those are quite mundane everyday tasks of every office clerk.

[-] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 months ago

Copy, cut, paste, undo. Use those keyboard shortcuts and if you work with documents for a notable part of the day you will save a half day a year or so.

[-] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 months ago

I know some people who still do that with the right click menu. Then again, they don’t really copy-paste stuff very often. Maybe only once a week or so.

[-] sparr@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

I'm going to click the [-] thread collapse button on Lemmy 50 times in the next ten minutes.

[-] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Type ; in JS or C.

[-] knatsch@feddit.de 5 points 5 months ago

I click the left mouse button more often each day, also when you work in a production facility you have a bunch of repetitive tasks, automating them is pretty much was humanity did in the last century.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I click the left mouse button more often each day, also when you work in a production facility you have a bunch of repetitive tasks, automating them is pretty much was humanity did in the last century.

How can we shave a second of the time it takes for you to click the left mouse button?

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago
[-] LinuxSBC@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

When you press a button on this revolutionary machine, it will automatically left click for you!

[-] kurwa@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Something we talk about at my job is being able to do stuff in our UI with less clicks, less is better.

[-] psud@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

My mouse seems to believe there is no use case for more than ten right clicks in a row, so it corrects them to left clicks. Sucks for minesweeper.

[-] sparr@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

That area of the chart is for people with really repetitive jobs/hobbies. There are MANY jobs where you do the same 5-10 minute thing 50x a day.

[-] autokludge@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago

I have a lot of repetition in my job (CAD modeller). Even just knowing keyboard shortcuts & setting up shortcuts for frequently used operations can easily net me 5 seconds per operation. I want to spend my energy on solving the task at hand, not on how to use the tool in the moment. I don't want to move the mouse away from the work area if I can help it.

Maybe not as frequent 5 per day - but scripts for really bottom of the barrel stuff:

  • Cycle thru all currently open drawing documents, zoom to full page and force save.
    • zoom out ensures drawing can be identified from document thumbnail.
    • the software is known to crash, especially editing drawings.
    • easy 10mins duplicated work saved.
  • Printing all open drawings out to the office printer in order with a delay between them, so i don't spend the next 20 minutes manually sorting the drawing prints.
    • printers don't always print in incoming order, some documents take longer to process.
  • find/replace for text notes
    • the software doesn't have that feature.

Lining up my indent levels.

[-] psud@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Space space space space

[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Consider using an auto formatter. I just barf my code into the editor, press a magic key combo and it’s all formatted better than I could do by hand.

That's the point. I automate it so I don't have to do it manually multiple times a day. I don't even press keys, it autoformats on periodic save.

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 5 points 5 months ago

Write emails? At 250min, or 4 hours it's either a major repetitive work task or a hobby.

Or if you're into wargaming or model making, assembly tasks or painting.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Write emails? At 250min, or 4 hours it’s either a major repetitive work task or a hobby.

Remember though, this is the amount of time savings something has to represent.

So you still have to accomplish the task.

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 1 points 5 months ago

So doubling it: your entire repetitive job. Would have efficiency increased to halve the time. Pretty rare.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I mean, there are some lower hanging fruit.

For example, if it takes 10 minutes to poop, but you can get that down to say, 5, with a decent centerfuge, across an entire company (1000 people, assuming every one is pooping five times a day).

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 1 points 5 months ago

... holy shit. Brilliant.

[-] muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I nolonger write emails chatgpt does that for me

[-] ironeagl@sh.itjust.works 42 points 5 months ago

FYI: there is actually an XKCD font if you want to match the original more closely. https://github.com/ipython/xkcd-font

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 26 points 5 months ago

This graph needs to be put on a poster with the caption "This is what you pay IT for"

[-] stanka@lemmy.ml 24 points 5 months ago

I feel it, fellow automation-human.

To me the automation calls harder than the gains, but when I do fix stuff for my org of 500 or so people, it is so good.

Thanks for this!

[-] autokludge@programming.dev 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'll do it for things that don't seem like it will save much, but because it was such an infrequent task I would forget how all the cogs worked when it needed to be done again, and what pitfalls to avoid. So it's not just direct time saved, but also increasing reliability.

[-] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Also, automation is not merely a time saver but very importantly also an error preventer! That is a major reason for much of my automation.

[-] Vendificate@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Question, can anyone please tell me what job titles cover this skill set? I've seen and performed a tremendous amount of this automation work by data analysts and data scientists, but it doesn't seem to fit the titles. I've seen 'process automation X' as an example but more often than not that title seems to be used for an actual engineer in some assembly line manufacturing job rather than what is essentially a programmer/GUI automator

[-] stanka@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

DevOps for me in hardware (chip design/verification)

You would thing a bunch of engineers would know how to use conputers, but no, they are good at chip deign. Automating stuff for them gives insane benefits and scale.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 5 months ago

I work on business intelligence, and part of my job is automatize processes, like comercial team updates excel files and those updates needs to be updated on the database so the dashboards show the latest version. I could do the update manually, but I don't like do that and wrote a python script that do that for me.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

I contribute to open source because i use the tool and the problem exists for me as well, and I know how to solve it. I don't care if others use it or not.

[-] sparr@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Would you spend an hour fixing a problem that will only save you ten minutes total in the rest of your lifetime using the software?

[-] jas0n@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

I used to write tons of automation in my previous data role. While time saved matters, the other important takeaway is reproducibility. Other people on the team were writing giant SQL scripts and highlight running each one and then manual checking to see if it worked... I'm talking about tables anywhere from 1-100 millions records. You aren't checking shit by skimming a top 1000. And what a ridiculously error prone process that is. Take the human out of that equation!

If the data came out wrong, it would be because the data came in different/corrupted, not because I missed a query. Speaking of different causing problems.. one time a company sent us data that was fixed width by character instead of fixed width by byte. Smh...

[-] diffusive@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

This! The point of automation is rarely saving time. The point of automation is increasing quality.

It can be a data quality, it can be mitigating a production risk, can be avoiding regression.

Heck even unit tests are automation (you may just manually test your code once and call the day).

I am not saying that automation is always good, but the evaluation should be

  1. what is the cost of production/data quality/regression gone wild? (Possibly in€/$/¥)
  2. what is the cost of the person/team performing the task over 1 Year (Again, £€$¥)
  3. what is the expected cost of the person/team implementing automation?

Then you do (3)*3 - (1) *3 - (2). Is it positive? You do, is it negative you? You don’t. The more it’s positive the higher the priority of doing.

Why the *3? The first because the expected cost of automation is always massively underestimated The second because it takes multiple times something goes wrong till the decision is reconsidered 🙂

Why 1 year? Because generally the task to automatize changes or disappear

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 12 points 5 months ago
[-] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

I hadn’t ever seen this XKCD, but as someone who’s constantly worrying about spending too long solving silly problems, this is really encouraging. Even more so when you solve someone else’s problems and save them time. Thanks for the share!

[-] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz -1 points 5 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
497 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

55610 readers
2656 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS