139
submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Apple to Remove Blood-Oxygen Sensor From Watch to Avoid U.S. Ban::Tech giant’s withdrawal of technology may end cloud hanging over $18 billion smartwatch business

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Uglyhead@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

A decision on Apple’s request for a permanent stay on the U.S. ban during its appeal is expected in the coming days.

An Apple spokeswoman said that the blood-oxygen feature would continue to be available on the watches for now.

Still at the maybe maybe maybe stage.

[-] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 10 months ago

Based on the article and other comments about the dispute, it seems like a justified legal move, but I hope they come around to an agreement regarding existing devices, rather than something insane, such as disabling the functionality on existing consumer devices.

I was given an Apple Watch in 2017. I replaced that (functioning just fine) watch about a year ago with a model with a pulse oximeter, specifically because I wanted the feature.

[-] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

They couldn’t do that without somehow compensating you. Not saying that is better but they can’t cripple a product that you have paid for.

[-] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

That will end up as a class action lawsuit with some merit. There will be a race to file this one.

[-] FoxBJK@midwest.social 3 points 10 months ago

Won’t get much back though. It’ll be a small refund based on the cost of the feature relative to the overall purchase price.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

can't cripple a product you have paid for

laughs in cloud and closed source

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago

I can't say I like Apple, but damn the whole patent thing sucks!

[-] jaschen@lemmynsfw.com 67 points 10 months ago

Well, Apple stole a patent after they were presented with it when they lied about wanting to do a "collaboration ". Then literally GUTTED their engineering team with crazy sign on bonuses while using what they saw to from that meeting and bypass their "collaboration".

I agree that patents suck IF there was no end date. But I'm totally ok with Apple getting in trouble for blatantly doing something like this.

Fuck Apple. They deserve this and more for being fucking too big to get in trouble.

[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago

Also let us not forget that Apple sued other phone manufacturers for having rectangular phones. You reap what you sow.

[-] jaschen@lemmynsfw.com 24 points 10 months ago

Also they tried to trademark the word "App" Store saying that "App Store" meant "Apple" Store.

Fuck Apple.

[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Yup. They care about money and monopoly as it also means more money.

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

All companies do. Any company that says they want a free market is lying or speaking from a place of disadvantage - they all would want a monopoly even more, preferably one where people are mandated by the government to buy their product. Or even better, if the government is the customer. $$$$$

[-] jaschen@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 10 months ago

Most tech companies on the stock market.

Plenty of mom and pop shops and 1 man websites that everyone should support.

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Yes, of course, good distinction. I had stock market companies in mind.

[-] jaschen@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 10 months ago

I go out of my way to support the small websites. If there is an app I want to download, I check out their site first to see if I can buy from there so they can save on the crazy fees google charges

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 9 points 10 months ago

Apple's MO is, and has been for a while, seeing something a startup is doing, saying "That's a stupid idea", then two years later unveiling an identical product and calling it innovation.

[-] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Seriously, just pay the licensing fee to the patent holder. For as much as their customers have paid them over the years, they can afford it.

[-] hai@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago

You’re getting downvoted a lot, but honestly you’re right. The fact that corporations are arguing over who gets to use technology that could help people with, or could have, medical conditions is really depressing. I get that an Apple Match isn’t going to be that accurate, but it could still be a sign that something is off.

Technology could help people, but I guess this is why we can’t have nice things.

[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago
[-] takeda@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago
this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
139 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

59456 readers
3931 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS