83
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"We've scraped together 40 drunks, a ninety year old tank, and a potato gun. Which the 40 drunks immediately dismantled to get the potatoes to make vodka, and set fire to the tank."

sad blyat noises

[-] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

"The enemy is both strong and weak. By a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak.”

[-] Olifant@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Shoigu's cat.

[-] JohnBrownsDream@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

If that's the state of the Russian military it says a lot that even with billions being thrown at Ukraine they're still fighting a year and half later

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

You can do quite a bit of fuckery when you keep a population ignorant and misinformed.

US Republicans furiously taking notes

[-] JohnBrownsDream@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

What I mean is that Ukraine still fighting Russia with so much money being thrown at their defense doesn't seem to jive with a narrative of a foundering Russian military

[-] Dreyns@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

What russia lacks in gear it makes up with cannon fodder and blood. This is how you last a year and a half.

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Like every article and interview with Ukranians about the conditions on the battlefield make mention of the RF consistently having an exponential (sometimes 10 to 1) artillery advantage, which also doesn't gel with the narrative of an unsupplied army on the brink of collapse

[-] Flaps@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

It's not the Russians sending waves of recruits into minefields but ok

[-] Dreyns@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Because you think they didn't do it when they attacked a few month ago ?

[-] wildncrazyguy@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

And what he’s saying is that you can do a lot of fuckery when you keep people misinformed.

[-] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They may not have many effective pieces of equipment or soldiers, but they sure as hell have a lot of ineffective ones

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

A normal day in the Russian army.

[-] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 25 points 1 year ago

They've already been moving troops and equipment away from the Finnish borded demonstrating that despite their narrative they're not actually worried about NATO invasion. If the Wagner mutiny revealed anything it's that if Finland ever wanted to take back Karelia now would be the time and to be honest we could snatch St. Petersburg while we're at it and basically receive zero resistance. We wont though and they know it.

[-] Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I would wager they'd resort to nuclear response if that happened. The last thing putin could ever accept is losing existing russian land.

[-] bluGill@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

Dictators like Putin dare not let their military become powerful. There is too much risk that the military will rise up and depose the dictator. In most NATO countries the military and people believe in the country and rule of law and so they won't do that. However a dictator doesn't have that option.

Russia will make a show of building up, but they will be careful about it. Weapons systems that look good in the demo will be ordered in small numbers, but not enough to make a difference in any war as they would be used against them. Even when they do have good systems, leaders are promoted based on loyalty to the dictator, not how good they are.

[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It’s also not just about intention, but about possibility. Russia lacks well-trained soldiers and modern equipment as demonstrated in the war. They can’t magically solve either of those problems.

[-] bluGill@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

No magic needed. Russia has some modern gear that they make themselves. They have some well trained soldiers. They know how to design modern gear. They know how to build more gear. They know how to train good soldiers.

What they can't do is fix their problems overnight. In just ten years they could fix the problems. Putin is old and statistically unlikely to live ten more years. Their system of government is vulnerable to the military running a coup and taking over so it is unlikely they will fix their problems, but they could.

[-] Mandy@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago

Build up forces from what? Babies? 90 year old elders?

Cause eveybody else is getting killed in Ukraine

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

That's great, every soldier there isn't killing Ukrainians.

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I kinda feel like if the whole rest of the world other than some shitty dictators is against you, maybe you’re in the wrong?

[-] u_tamtam@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago

No worry, the vocal Russia/China sympathizers out here will try to convince you that the whole world not aligning with them is a CIA job, neocolonialism and western media brainwash.. :)

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ha! What drivel.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

Conscripts to the western front. The one with the rifle shoots.

[-] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

Westerners will say they aren't propagandized, while thinking Enemy at the Gates is a documentary.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 9 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Aug 9 (Reuters) - Russia will build up forces at its western borders following Finland's accession to the U.S.-led NATO alliance, Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu told the governing board of the ministry on Wednesday.

"The collective West is waging a proxy war against Russia," he said, according to his ministry, pointing to its "unprecedented support" for Ukraine in supplying tens of billions of dollars' worth of weaponry to help Kyiv repel Russian forces.

The two Nordic states abandoned generations of neutrality that had held throughout the Cold War to seek NATO membership following Russia's invasion of Ukraine early last year.

"On Finnish territory, it is likely that additional military contingents and strike weapons of NATO will be deployed, capable of hitting critical targets in the northwest of Russia at a considerable depth," Shoigu said.

"Today, at the meeting of the Board, we will consider issues related to the creation of the Leningrad and Moscow military districts with the simultaneous strengthening of groupings of troops of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation on our western borders."

Shoigu said the number of NATO military units from outside the region stationed in eastern Europe had increased by two-and- a-half times since February last year and that they were now 30,000-strong in total.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] sneaky_b45tard@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/ycK-XgACMXU

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[-] theodewere@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

pfft sure they will.. they are barely holding onto power.. they don't even know if the Rosgvarda will protect them at this point..

[-] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Scarecrows equipped with more Mosins?

[-] teft@startrek.website -4 points 1 year ago

Welp. Everybody strap in. This could get bumpy.

[-] interolivary@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago

It won't, it's just bluster. With 90% probability they won't do jack shit to a NATO country because they know that'd be the end of us all. That 10% is the Russian sociopath factor; I could absolutely believe they'd prefer killing a huge chunk of humanity and themselves rather than look weak

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

It really won't. They need to bluster but all they can do is station un/poorly trained conscripts and talk big about it.

[-] AnarchoYeasty@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

They couldn't even handle Ukraine. How is this going to get bumpy? What troops do they even have to build up in the west.

Remember a few years ago when Russian mercs decided to attack an American special forces team in Syria and they not only failed to kill a single American they got bombed into oblivion?

Same thing will happen if these troops so much as step into NATO territory

[-] Olifant@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

From what I heard it was a bit more nuanced than that. The russian government deliberately ordered the army's air defences disabled which allowed American air power to have free reign in that battlefield. I've no doubt the americans would have beaten them back regardless but with casualties.

this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
83 points (95.6% liked)

World News

32283 readers
941 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS