this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2026
270 points (98.2% liked)

politics

31754 readers
3852 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I FUCKING TOLD YOU SO!

I want a goddamn WRITTEN APOLOGY from every motherfucker who ever downvoted me for saying that Bernie had a better chance than Hillary if he'd made it to the general election.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Berniebros were right all along. Imagine the world where he won...

I think this country 10 years ago would have never elected Bernie. Millenials are in control now. This is a generational shift. We will get progress one funeral at a time.

[–] zarathustrad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I mean, he may have got JFKed but at least we would know.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 75 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I hate the corpo news. I listened to these asahates try and explain that the night was about centrist Democrats being able to turn solid red districts. People were looking at the message of radical shift away from the current course and its being watered down. NO motherfuckers...this is NOT the time to come to the middle and court the right. This is the time to MAGA up the left and course correct away from that loosing strategy.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They know where their bread is buttered and they suck for it. I don't want to say it's time to MAGA up the progressives because, well MAGA are stupid reactionaries that can't hold a coherent thought in their head but you're damn right that it's time for actual action that are FOR the people and not have it watered down by Republicans.

I still think this whole election isn't about the Democrats at all and the wins from people like El-Sayed the non-DSA DSA, DSA Ashley Herrmann winning, the election of Talarico and Hamilton in Kansas, and the extremely close race with Angie Nixon in Florida. All of these guys won their races not being progressive or liberal or centrist, they won because the Average American just wants change, someone who will listen to them and will vote for anyone who will give them that or at least promise them that because we're all tired boss.

Again, of course these guys know where their bread is buttered, so they'll ignore that whole lesson to keep the status quo of corporate money.

Keep voting and donating to Progressives, three decades of voting and I'm loving the changes that I've donated and volunteered for almost two decades taking hold.

[–] AgentSeven@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And already the messaging is coming out "if the lesson Dems take from this is they can move to the left they're going to lose and lose big" like what the actual fuck.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The news focusing on the most left as a boogey man was their mistake. It just made it obvious who was saying the right things to get popular support. The lesson is MORE LEFT not less...

Go Left, or get left.

load more comments (1 replies)

Can we just socialism plz

Abdul is so cute bro making me blush

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Subtitle:

Tuesday’s election results demolished the conventional wisdom that Democrats need to run cautious, corporate-friendly centrists to win in purple and red states.

The voting members of the DNC recognized that after the 2024 election...

That's why they pivoted to Martin as chair, and why trying to win every race and supporting everyone that made it thru fair primaries paid off.

Like, Martin literally spent a decade running Minnesota, where over and over he saw the best way to turn a purple/red state blue, was progressive candidates.

It's really getting old that people don't realize the party is essentially the chair, and the only thing this chair wants more than charismatic progressives, is fair primaries.

[–] dumples@piefed.social 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As a Minnesotan I have been so happy with the DFL here. I was so happy when he hit the national spot. Running progressive and focusing on pocketbook issues instead of playing catch-up against whatever cultural issue the Republicans want to play. You can still support minorities but stay on message of helping everyone

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Logically it makes sense too; Maslow's hierarchy of needs.

If people basic needs aren't met, it's hard to care about anything (or anyone) else.

Meet everyone's basic needs, and we stop the infighting. That's the real reason the oligarchs want to gut social safety nets. If we're not afraid for ourselves, we'll start caring about others.

If we all start caring about others and can plan past the next pay check, suddenly everyone realizes billionaires are the problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I know that centrist are also hanging their hats on to how they're the future with some of these red state wins like Iowa but honestly I hope that this article is what comes to fruition in the next decade.

Vote progressive no matter who.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

More the new era of Old Democrats. Anyone remember FDR?

[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

you mean the guy that people liked so much and got elected so many times that they had to change the constitution to make sure it didn't happen again? almost makes it seem like progressives have always been popular

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

I've read that there was an era where Democrats that made things happen for the people but never saw it myself but I hope to.

[–] Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

They made bad choices last time and decided they better show up and proved it works. At the same time keep expectations realistic. Understand what they can and can't do w/o presidency and 60 Senators.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This was Hasan Pikers night. Hope your excited to hear about a twitch streamer from California @SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I still don’t give a shit about a twitch streamer.

I saw another post about him being a kingmaker and that’s just delusional.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

I still don’t give a shit about a twitch streamer.

I saw another post about him being a kingmaker and that’s just delusional.

Except for the absolute validity of it. He picked the winners. In the primary. And faced off INCREDIBLE resistance. And he worked to his picks the winners. And then they won.

Its delusional to not recognize them as kingmaker. Youʻll never stop hearing about them, from now until theyʻre as old as that crypt-keeper James Carville.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›