this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2026
759 points (99.6% liked)

Buy European

10933 readers
262 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived version

  • Bulk Infrastructure proposes a 6,500-kilometer Norway-to-Montreal cable bypassing U.S. territory entirely.
  • Costs exceed $620 million, with financing, customers, and route surveys still unresolved.
  • Routing around U.S. territory does not guarantee independence from American networks downstream.

Norwegian infrastructure company Bulk Infrastructure is proposing a direct fiber cable from Norway to Canada, routed around the United States entirely. The project, named Leif Erikson, remains a proposal, not a construction announcement.

Canada currently has relatively few direct international cable options that avoid U.S. routing, a structural gap the project is designed to address. That context, combined with growing government interest in infrastructure resilience, gives the proposal its strategic weight.

...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Scrollone@lemmy.zip 127 points 3 days ago (2 children)

YES! I want it. A way to get Canada closer to Europe... in preparation for them to join Schengen and the EEA

[โ€“] Shayeta@feddit.org 58 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[โ€“] microcapybara@sopuli.xyz 39 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Sorry, this is a data pipeline. Unlessโ€ฆ

[โ€“] aim4harmony@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The new "oil", filling sweet loving Euros with energy.

[โ€“] kaykay@piefed.social 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I can only see upsides with also adding some syrup pipelines next to the fiber cable.
Crude oil is just awful on pancakes for example, why do people even want to import all that yuck? SMH

[โ€“] Xanxia@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

The data cable will be inside the syrup cable. Then when the syrup stops flowing we know the data cable has been compromised.

Sort of like the condom/talabasco/condom model of contraception.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] BooBees@fedinsfw.app 7 points 3 days ago

You wouldnโ€™t download a plate of maple syrup

[โ€“] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

The great trans-Atlantic maple pipeline!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 68 points 3 days ago (3 children)

How much maple syrup can flow through the pipe?

[โ€“] Philippe23@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 days ago

Can't you just chew on the leaves to curb withdrawal symptoms?

[โ€“] 0x0@lemmy.zip 20 points 3 days ago

Asking the real questions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Also important that it bypasses Britain (from were there are cables directly to Canada) since the Brits do digital surveillance on everything that goes through cables that land in Britain and give that data to the Americans, as shown in the Snowden Revelations.

[โ€“] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

since the Brits do digital surveillance on everything that goes through cables that land in Britain and give that data to the Americans

Sorry to break it to you... but ECHELON is a surveillance program operated by the signatories of the UKUSA Security Agreement... aka the Five Eyes... Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK, and the United States. Canada is in that list spying for the group right alongside everyone else. Two of the intercept stations are located in Canada... CFS Leitrim (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) and CFB Gander (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada).

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 4 points 3 days ago

Yes that's important. I would also be happy to support more connectivity via Greenland and Iceland.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Zink@programming.dev 11 points 2 days ago

This seems like a good idea even from within the US, AND even if we imagine that this country was not giving the rest of the world reasons to keep their distance.

It seems to me it would make for a higher capacity, more resilient internet.

[โ€“] pathos@lemmy.ml 36 points 3 days ago

Faster connection between Frankfurt and Canadian stock exchanges, encrypted personal data being on EU and Canadian servers, lower ping for gamers, better teleconferencing for the 2 tier EU meetings, etc.

Seems like a win to me

[โ€“] akunohana@piefed.blahaj.zone 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Counterpoint: place a few hundred thousand wireless repeaters on buoys.

Serious answer: software encryption is a gazillion times cheaper than this. If however freedom from reliance on American infra is the goal, then I stand corrected.

[โ€“] potter2010@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I believe the goal is to get away from USA infrastructure. Canada is already looking at building additional internal infrastructure so that domestic traffic never goes south of the border.

All the software encryption in the world is useless if a deranged USA leader gives the order to stop traffic originating/going to Canada.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Ozymati@lemmy.nz 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Don't need to know what's in the traffic to block it. US govt has demonstrated willingness to cut off technology at critical points to try and get what it wants. So yeah I'm thinking it's about infrastructure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] DrunkenDuckling@lemmus.org 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Imagine the latency of a few hundred thousand repeaters

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] skunk@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Love the idea, but the US would just blow it up if it hurt their interests

[โ€“] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 days ago

That's why they in secret will build a second cable from Canada's west coast and down around South America ๐Ÿคซ

[โ€“] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

As a Californian I highly recommend doing so

[โ€“] nullspace@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Redundancy is good.

[โ€“] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think they should do it. Having an option that isn't dependent on America's ill will, is important if civilized nations are to have agency.

They also should make their own Starlink-ish constellation.

Europe and friends had benefited from a relative golden age of peace, using the peace dividend to invest in their civilian sectors. While it would be painful to invest in defense, the time has come to do so. It sucks, but the Dogey Confederates will abuse decent people if given an opening.

[โ€“] jdeveth@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Europe does have their own Starlink, Eutelsat OneWeb.

I am not sure how they compare, but it's big enough to have global coverage according to Wikipedia.

[โ€“] bookmeat@fedinsfw.app 16 points 3 days ago
[โ€“] Kjell@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Cool more intercontinental connections are needed. Today there are surprisingly few connections between Europe and North America which is sensitive if Russia decide to sabotage it.

There is also another major fiber project from Norway. That will go across the artic towards Japan and China, I think it would also connect to north America but I'm not sure if that was Alaska or Canada.

[โ€“] bedwyr@piefed.ca 10 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The undersea cables are all very vulnerable to hostile nation states. You all need satellites as well, although they are deploying satellite killers in orbit as we speak, the russians and the us, not sure what china is doing.

[โ€“] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Basically any country with an air force and a ballistic missile program has satellite killers.

China has demonstrated the ability to shoot down satellites using a fighter loaded with medium range missiles.

[โ€“] bedwyr@piefed.ca 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

China has also targeted our satellites with lasers, in a not so subtle hint that they could hit them with missiles the article said, 15 some years back.

We are going to be trapped on earth if we start satellite wars, as the space junk will make launching very dicey. Even a piece of satellite the size of a grain of rice can destroy a satellite because of the speeds involved, as I understand it.

Tbh I expect us to kessler ourselves in my lifetime.

Might actually be the thing that makes everyone care about climate change

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] spacegoat@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Iโ€™ll believe Europe is serious when they leave the 5 Eyes or kick out the US

[โ€“] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The only European nation in the 5-eyes is Britain.

That said Canada too is part of the 5-eyes.

Maybe you're thinking of one of the outer "eyes" organizations such as the 14-eyes, of which several other European countries are members.

[โ€“] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago

Letโ€™s do it!

Yes please.

[โ€“] YouTalkinToMe@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Excellent idea.

[โ€“] Squizzy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I dont understand the last point, are we saying the existence of the cable outside the US doesn't prevent US tech being used on it? Because that isnt a con, its a given and how the infrastructure should work. It would never be a private network, if it is for comms anyone can use it. Likely, the US could just buy pairs to use themselves but the location gives it opportunity.

[โ€“] Denjin@feddit.uk 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The cable itself isn't what's at issue, it's whom owns the infrastructure on the end of it. ie if a European owned cable crosses the Atlantic and lands in America into a landing station owned by AT&T or Comcast it's reliant on US compliance in its traffic. America has proven itself to be a hostile power to European interests now and therefore cannot be relied upon.

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Watch how quickly an 'identified terrorist group' sabotages that cable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] micgerne@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Why is the image for the article from a completely different project on the other side of the world?

[โ€“] sidebro@lemmy.zip 34 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Because it fits. What image would be used otherwise? Just the bottom of the sea?

[โ€“] sepiroth154@feddit.nl 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They would probably preefer to sea the Norwegian or Canadian flag.

[โ€“] sidebro@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[โ€“] micgerne@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago

also "reef" in preefer.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next โ€บ