this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2026
90 points (96.9% liked)

United Kingdom

6978 readers
631 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DonkeyStar@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Prepare for flatmate porn.

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 91 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

UK government:

Real problems: I sleep

Moral panic: real shit

Already banned (porn) in the UK: squirting, face sitting, bondage, seeing any sex related content without submitting government ID (including educational material, online supportive discussion on intimate problems, LGBTQ+ related material, etc), water sports, humiliation, fisting, consensual "verbal abuse". Thanks UK government.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait, they seriously banned squirting?

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Literally because it upset PM David Cameron's mother.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

[insert wtf meme]

If it upsets you, DON'T FUCKING WATCH IT.

For example I don't watch scat porn because I find it disgusting. But I'd never want to legislate on my personal opinion on such a... subjective matter.

As long as it's consenting adults, and no crime is committed (so, still no snuff/child porn). But if people want to get off to others playing with piss, shit, squirt, or being choked, or having their balls beaten into a pulp, fucking let them...

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You accidentally committed a tautology - it's a crime because it's illegal/there's a law against it. With this law, it will, by definition, become a crime.

I have no idea what the UK's laws are on incest itself, nor fake depictions of crimes (e.g. fake snuff), and I don't intend to find out.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not really a tautology.

My whole point was to not criminalise porn itself, but handle the action within it criminally only if the action is a crime.

For example, choking someone consensually isn't a crime. Squirting isn't a crime. Having sex with your fake sister isn't a crime. However somehow, making porn of it, made these actions a crime. That's what needs to go. If the action in itself is a crime - murder, mutilation, CSAM, incestuous sex (yes, sexual contact with an immediate relative is a criminal act in the UK), these are all crimes, and if they appear in porn, they should be investigated and treated as such.

But, again, squirting isn't a crime. Drinking your piss, eating your partner's shit, (consensually) choking your partner, again, not a crime. So there's no need to criminalise their appearance in porn either.

[–] whatthey@feddit.uk 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well said on both comments.

I think there's far too many religious zealots within government and too many religious groups advocating for such things to be banned.

I feel that we're not far from banning homosexuality by proxy - as some people might find their acts offensive.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I find religious zealots who try to force their views onto others incredibly offensive, can we ban that too please?

Starting with public worship and such. Absolutely no need to have either Christians, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists or anyone else preaching in public. No, idgaf about your religious freedom, you're free to follow any religion, not create a public nuisance and harass people.

[–] whatthey@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

Amen Sister/Brother

[–] murmelade@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Every accusation... David Cameron's mom is a squirter.

[–] 3scene@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 days ago

They can piss off! Wait, thats banned too?

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

oh sure, when your entire system of government is based entirely on incestuous relations to "stay pure" for generations, its ok. but when Phil wants to wank his pecker to it, it's unacceptable.

double standards UK.

[–] smaximov@lemmy.world 54 points 2 days ago

Wh-what are you doing, step-government?!! 😩😫🥵

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

In related news, billionaires will continue to rape and dispose of children without meaningful consequence.

[–] yuumei@feddit.uk 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Incest porn banned, incest itself not banned. Fucking Labour banning things instead of actually fixing real problems yet again

[–] nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I presume sexual contact with minors is already banned, at least officially? If two consenting adult siblings want a go at each other, more power to them, because they make them royalty.

[–] myyass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Birth rates are in decline! Let's ban porn, that will fix things. Why has nothing changed? Sorry, I can't be bothered. We're going after video games next!

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well, you cant see porn in the UK without giving ID anyway, so I assume no one actually accesses these sites from the UK anyway (without a VPN), so this will have no effect.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

The effect it gives is yet another tool for police to hold over the public and enforce selectively. A wonderful tool for political enemies for instance.

[–] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I cannot emphasise enough how trivial it is to view porn without providing ID or using a VPN in the UK. You can literally type "porn" into your search engine of choice and see anything you want in the images tab. Part of the reason the OSA was so badly received is because it's literally unachievable.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

I accidentally did this yesterday. Was looking fora specific smbc-comic that involved porn as the joke.

Google just straight up showed me shitloads of hardcore images. No safesearch blur no nothing. Just right to the goodies.

Had to tab put immediately my wife was in the room.

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In other news, VPN signups are at an all time high.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

Their legality is also under review.

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Uk goverment once again showing it doesnt know how a VPN works and that the USA is the current mass producer of step-daughter content (you sick fucks)

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

Ah but they claim they can beat that by fingerprinting the specific packets from banned videos or aome horseshit

[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Are step family still incest though?

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 13 points 2 days ago

What are you doing step-strangler?!?

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

An amendment to include step- in the ban passed. By one vote.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 days ago

No more hardcore stuff. Damn. Didnt know the puritants would be back again

[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is the dumbest thing.

[–] Coldcell@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

The dumbest thing so far today!

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Its really a wonder that these Victorian prudes haven't caused their own extinction yet.

[–] Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That will be very weird to defend. I can't wait to hear conservatives' arguments for them.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They are really pining for the victorian era.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

where incest was best and nobody talked about it?

load more comments
view more: next ›