this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2026
5 points (85.7% liked)

Climate

9076 readers
77 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/60079712

A new report by Urgewald, a Germany-based NGO, combines two assessments of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank’s (AIIB) transparency performance. The first draws on the 2025 DFI Transparency Index by Publish What You Fund (PWYF), which compares AIIB’s transparency policies with those of other multilateral development banks (MDBs). The second is based on findings from the AIIB Watch, a civil society initiative monitoring environmental and human rights risks in AIIB-financed infrastructure projects.

Here is the full report: Billions Beyond Control – AIIB's Disclosure Deficit (pdf).

Archived

  • The AIIB is performing worse then comparable organziations, the Germany-based NGO Urgewald says in a report. AIIB does not disclose indirect investments (sub-investments) made through financial intermediaries, in contrast to several other entities that provide such key information.
  • The precise number of people affected by resettlement due to AIIB projects is frequently not disclosed. When data is available, documentation is inconsistent, varies widely in quality, and contains contradictory information about resettlement impacts.
  • Key environmental and social documents are repeatedly published after project approval. Prior to approval, documentation often does not include a full risk assessment based on field visits.
  • AIIB continues to finance fossil fuel projects. Projects that appear to be clean energy finance, such as the proposed China Inner Mongolia Clean Energy Transition Project, are in reality financing fossil fuel infrastructure – in this case, a coal project.

[...]

  • AIIB’s transparency framework looks stronger on paper than it is in practice [...] The policy sets out a standard, but broad exceptions make circumventing it possible. For instance, the policy establishes minimum disclosure periods, but management can waive these requirements at its discretion without disclosing the reasons to the public.
  • The new lending instruments, Climate Policy-Based Financing (CPBF) and Nature Finance, are AIIB’s two newest and very well-funded vehicles. Both reproduce the same weakness this report identifies elsewhere, lacking disclosure or safeguarding regulations that match their scale.
  • CPBF projects are disclosed inconsistently, circumvent AIIB’s own safeguards [...] Additionally, CPBF is counted as 100% climate finance without clear disclosure, monitoring and exclusion regulations.

[...]

The AIIB is a international development bank headquartered in Beijing, China, and launched by the head of the Chinese Communist Party Xi Jinping.

At its inception, the AIIB was explicitly linked to China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), but now also included investments with states that are not involved with the BRI. The bank is headed by Zou Jiayi, a Chinese politician and economist, who previously served as a vice minister of the Ministry of Finance of the People's Republic of China from 2018 to 2021.

[...]

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here