this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2026
68 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12569 readers
456 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Provide sources when making a claim. Do your research or google it doesn't cut it. The one making the claim is responsible for backing it.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DeadEndLink@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Who talked these dumb shit boomer MP's into installing back doors in everything?

How could they possibly think this won't cause problems?

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 19 points 2 weeks ago

Gary Anandasangaree is the bill’s proponent.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Aren't most of our MPs GenX and millenials at this point.

[–] GodofLies@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

It's not an age/culture war. It's a wealth-class war.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Millennials grew up with the internet, it's the boomers that are the problem.

[–] cheat700000007@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Millennials are fully capable of being dipshits and or bought

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So is anyone, even gen z by that logic, so I don't get your point.

[–] cheat700000007@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Bulk generalization is a stupid lazy way of pointing fingers without addressing actual problems

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 weeks ago

And tools that people use to protect themselves.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

It will also expose Canadians to a higher surface area of data breaches. Which in turn will mean Canadians will most likely be exposed to more scams and fraud.

[–] Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

What's moronic about this is that it won't stop criminals. They'll just move over to a different platform that is more secure.

But everyday Canadians' privacy will pay the price because backdoors now exist for bad actors (both law enforcement nutjobs and criminals) to use against us

[–] mHtt@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

Carney was probably given a secret option to either enslave Canadians himself or let the Trump admin do it...

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT IS A PUPPET TO CORPORATE INTERESTS AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN

Wages are depressed by a litany of loopholes provided to businesses. ISPs and cell providers are allowed to run effective monopolies in order to gouge Canadians. Grocery stores are allowed to conspire together to raise prices. Hosing prices are kept high by corporate landlords. Electrification is being delayed and fucking BILLIONS are being spend subsidizing oil and gas.

This is just another example of Canada saying "Yes, we will fuck Canadian citizens for as long and hard corporations tell us." And the best part is, both of our two and a half parties are onboard with this.

If you need a VPN, use Mullvad: https://mullvad.net/en They are not the cheapest but they are the most privacy focused provider I have found.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I don't understand how signal can "pull out" of Canada.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Pull their app from in Canada, block connections to their servers from IPs owned by Canadian ISPs.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I should clarify. Like if it's on their website to download freely, why is it on them to police it? If thr gov is going to do something stupid like that, people can still download it.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Signal is a centralized platform, even with the software rely on Signal's servers to make connections. Blocking access to Canadians is easier than fighting a legal battle with a federal government for facilitating encrypted communications with no backdoor.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm saying they don't have to block anything. "Hi I'm signal and I exist over here". They aren't enabling Canadians but just having servers on the internet.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Buddy, the service they provide is end to end encrypted messaging with no backdoor. If Canada makes that illegal, via c-22, then Signal will be operating an illegal service in Canada. They will block access to Canadian usesers to protect themselves from legal attack from the Canadian government.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I just don't think it's so black and white. So I connect to a VPN that goes to... I dunno, Africa. Then I use signal. It's still E2EE. And I'm still in Canada.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I can explain this a dozen more times but I can not understand it for you.

If C-22 becomes law Signal will stop serving Canadian users. You can use a VPN to access Signal but that is a direct action taken by you to bypass a regional block. If VPN providers also stop serving Canadian users, because that would violate a Canadian ban on encryption, how are you going to access Signal? If the Canadian government gives ISPs permission to block VPN providers operating outside of Canada how will you access Signal?

This isn't a problem that gets fixed by sideloading an app onto your phone, this is a problem with Canadian law and Canadian politicians jerking off corporations.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I understand that signal will stop, my point is why bother putting in preventative measures.

Say there's a law that says it's illegal for Canadians to go to the united states. Say the united states has no border. Should the united states enforce border security because the Canadian government said so?

Listen, I understand what is happening and I'm not in any way supporting it, I just think it's odd that signal has to pull out instead of the Canadian government blocking it. You know what I mean yet?

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

If you have a weed vending business here in Canada, and you sell weed online to the USA, do you think that Canada would not sell you out in a second to the US? Many countries around the world are just as happy to throw someone under the bus at the request of a foreign government, particularly if it is furthering the erosion of personal encryption.

And I do agree that the Canadian government should be on the hook to enforce their own laws but it's way easier for them to put the screws to individuals and force compliance or voluntarily withdraw of access.

Are there any Canadians on the signal dev team, have any Canadians contributed a bug fix to the project, are there Canadians working for Signal in any other capacity? Those people could be subject to legal pressure by Canada due to their involvement with a project that is willing to bypass Canadian law. Pulling access is the easiest way to project the project whether is it the morally correct solution or not.