Throw the fucking book at this dude, Japan.
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
If convicted, he could face life in prison or the death penalty.
Murder-robbery may fall into first degree, and it's said the Japanese conviction rate is high.
Unlike Pemberton who offed a trans and later got away scot-free because of a broken justice system of a developing country.
I find it very likely that a US serviceman murdered Anna Yagi.
Without seeing how unique the tattoos on his arm are, I don't know how confident I would be that David Ballard is the serviceman who murdered her.
Why do US Marines in Okinawa keep misbehaving? Like this is happening all the time. What's so difficult about NOT killing and raping civilians? It shouldn't be that difficult.
They're trained murderers, mercenaries on a payroll not people defending their community who had to take up arms, they kill for money (or for the love of the game, which is arguably worse)... who would expect them to behave in any humane or responsible way? And I say that as a former little soldier of the FFL. 🤷♂️
They're Marines.
Behavioral problems long before entering the uniformed services. There is little quality control.
Yeah, that's why I included that snippet about the huge increase in crimes among US servicemen in Japan in this last year.
It's definitely getting worse, owing to fractured incompetent leadership more than anything else.
It was enabled, facikitated for so long it became culture. Oppressors.
Unfortunately it's not just a US or a "in Okinawa" problem. It's a problem as old as civilisations have had militaries and sent them to other countries.
I'm not saying there's no point in trying to fix it but... It's pervasive in time and space.
When America sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists…
I mean, look at their president. It is their best after all.
Young people, barely old enough to be legally adults, preselected for their physicality, self-selecting for a willingness to believe or pretend at belief in american mythology, trained to be more effectively violent and to choose to be violent as a primary strategy, and then thrown half a world away from their home aren't serving as good ambassadors for their home nation? Why is anyone surprised?
its rape and murder. It doesnt matter how young he is-- he is an adult. If he did it he should pay the penalty for his crimes in both japan and the US, whichever is steeper. Fair trial and then execution sounds like what it'll be, and he'll be getting off easy, for what he seems to have done. fuck that guy, and your trying to water down his crimes is pretty odd.
You know that thing, where, if a member of an ethnicity does something, the whole ethnicity gets blamed?
Surprise! White Americans aren't exempt. Japan's pretty racist at the best of times, but it's going to be extra, if you match that description, for a while.
Although building on that, I think the "Mainland" Japanese have been pretty content to have the Americans corralled on one little island (Post WW2, it was bases on the home islands that were shut down), with their easily othered country-cousins the Okinawans being the ones who have to deal with the American troops day-to-day, many of whom are dumb kids on their first tour. I can guarantee you that neither my dad in the 60s nor my brother in the 90s was interested in good-faith cultural exchange while stationed there with the Marines.
There are still plenty of US Navy bases on the Japanese home islands. SRF Yokosuka, Sasebo, and ~~NAS~~ MCAS Iwakuni spring to mind
Yes, but literally three quarters of the US presence is on Okinawa. Just saying I think Tokyo is okay with that, as they get a the full military force multiplier with, from their perspective, a 75% discount on awful American behavior because the Ryukus are physically isolated and culturally distinct.
Not necessarily inaccurate; I just wanted to clarify that there is still a substantial US military presence on the home islands, because the original comment made it seem like only Okinawa hosts US forces
There are bases all over. Okinawa definitely gets the short end of the stick, though. They need to get out of Okinawa to some uninhabited rock instead since they can't control things.