this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2026
55 points (100.0% liked)

Climate

9076 readers
77 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If this goes as expected, we'll get more cancer, more premature death and worse quality of life. This court is so corrupt that, in a fair system, the majority of "justices" would have been impeached and removed long ago.

[–] UnequalExchange@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

lol impeached only?

There would have been more 'befitting' things that happenedd to them than just 'impeached' lol. But this is the system the people want cause the people havent substantiated any substantial actions to change this yet... so....

[–] Atom@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Last-minute Alito recusal In a surprise move, the court notified lawyers in the case just one week before argument that Justice Samuel Alito had decided not to participate. The court clerk provided no explanation in his letter. But environmental organizations and watchdog groups had been calling for Alito's recusal because of his investments in Phillips 66 and ConocoPhillips.

I'm shocked he recused himself

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He’s thinking about stepping down I thought I saw… maybe he doesn’t want to put his name on another insanely evil decision right beforehand so he doesn’t get protestors outside his lake house/beach bungalow/ yacht?

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it's more likely he was told they don't need his vote.

[–] UnequalExchange@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

YUP! THIS is it!

lol as if a few inconvienet peaceful prptestors in front of his house will make a difference 😂🤣😂🤣