this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
287 points (99.0% liked)

News

36270 readers
2559 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An Oregon weekly newspaper has had to lay off its entire staff and halt print after 40 years because its funds were embezzled by a former employee, its editor said, in a devastating blow to a publication that serves as an important source of information in a community that, like many others nationwide, is struggling with growing gaps in local news coverage.

About a week before Christmas, the Eugene Weekly found inaccuracies in its bookkeeping, editor Camilla Mortensen said. It discovered that a former employee who was “heavily involved” with the paper’s finances had used its bank account to pay themselves $90,000 since at least 2022, she said.

The paper also became aware of at least $100,000 in unpaid bills — including to the paper’s printer — stretching back several months, she said.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EdanGrey@sh.itjust.works 63 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is why you never have one person responsible for finance without oversight. Who was reviewing budgets, checking the bank balance etc? How could one person make payments alone?

[–] Ech@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Isn't this why a lot of companies have essentially mandatory vacation for their accountants? Gives a baked in reason to have another set of eyes on the practices of the department.

[–] EdanGrey@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

A company large enough would have internal auditors so that would probably be unnecessary. But best practice is to have segregation of duties and layers of authority, so that no one person has too much power. (source, am an auditor)

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 13 points 2 years ago

In some countries/provinces it’s actually legally mandated. The idea is that if someone is committing fraud there will be a period where it isn’t committed, to help make the fraud discoverable. Those mandatory vacations are also often when audits happen, both internal and by government.

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

My corporate bank requires their management to take at least one two-week vacation a year so that any schemes they might have running fall apart.

[–] claycle@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I worked for a medical imaging company that got acquired many years ago. The CFO was a nice enough guy, with the perfect blonde wife, huge suburban house, matching Lexuses for him and missus, and his son was the handsome, curly-headed quarterback with the giant fancy pickup truck (that no teenager NEEDS unless they're the spawn of cattle ranchers...) at the best high school in the county.

But, as I said, we got acquired, and the new company sent over a junior-junior (ie, just out of school) accountant to do the boring duty of running the books. Poor kid tried and tried but he just couldn't get the numbers to add up, so he went to his boss and apologized for not being able to do his first assignment. Boss took a look, cocked an eye, patted the kid on the back for doing an excellent job, and took it to legal.

Seems the CFO was just writing himself $50,000 checks once a month to fuel his lifestyle and "nobody knew it". He ended up in the prison, divorced in a hot second, and his former wife and kid skedaddled out of town before the thing even went to trial.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 41 points 2 years ago

FYI, it is not dead yet.

The paper has launched a fundraising effort that included the creation of a GoFundMe page. As of Friday afternoon — just one day after the paper announced its financial troubles — the GoFundMe had raised more than $11,000.

Now that the former employee suspected of embezzlement has been fired, “we have a lot of hope that this paper is going to come back and be self-sustaining and go forward,” he said.

[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 years ago (5 children)

How is 90k enough to kill a company? Payroll likely dwarfs that number. And creditors will usually work with you if there’s an issue like that and you can show them what happened and how it’s fixed.

[–] TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

While I have no idea of specifics, 90K missing plus 100K in debt to several places, including to the paper’s printer, might be the real issue. The debt stretches back months, and it's possible companies were threatening to stop doing business with the paper. If the printer cuts you off, you can't print the paper that would make up lost revenue. And it's going to be hard to get financing for a new printer when you have outstanding unpaid debt.

The paper also became aware of at least $100,000 in unpaid bills — including to the paper’s printer — stretching back several months

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I feel like many of those vendors would be willing to setup payment plans or forgive some of the debt outright if the lapsed can prove they were victims of embezzlement (theft) and criminal negligence (not paying the bills of the company as the one responsible for such)

I’m sure many of my vendors would work with me, several of them I approve paying this entire debt amount to them monthly.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

I feel like many of those vendors would be willing to setup payment plans or forgive some of the debt outright if the lapsed can prove they were victims of embezzlement (theft) and criminal negligence (not paying the bills of the company as the one responsible for such)

[–] EdanGrey@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 years ago

Many companies are not that cash rich, if that was most of their bank balance, and they have $100k debt, suppliers may refuse to any more service until debts have been repaid. Can't acquire what you need, can't produce what you need to sell to raise the cash, so you go under.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago

Maybe 90k is all they can prove at the moment, but it's really a larger number.

It also seems like something you'd have insurance for.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Eugene isn’t big, and paper is dying. They probably operated on a very tight budget.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That dude is fucked when he gets arrested and there’s just a super clear paper trail leading back.

I hope the paper manages to survive this, and maybe recoup some of the money lost through legal means. And I hope they can hire their staff back soon! I bet none of them would be against going back considering!

[–] Buck@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

The clever part is that there is no paper trail: the printer hadn't been paid. 🤓

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Disappointing! I read it quite regularly at my local coffee shop when I lived in Eugene. It wasn't the best journalism, to be sure, but it was quite good for a free paper!

[–] Additional_Prune@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

My dad worked for a major bank. Sometimes when an employee stole money from the bank, it made the news. Other times, the bank kept quiet about it. You don't always hear about this stuff because the business is too embarrassed to make it public.

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Greed, the one thing the left and right can unite on.