this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2026
175 points (94.4% liked)

interestingasfuck

9751 readers
599 users here now

For exceptionally interesting content

Rules:

  1. Posts must be interesting
  2. Posts must be based in reality
  3. No hateful content
  4. No harmful content
  5. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] procrastitron@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doesn’t count unless those are Lego brand guide wires.

(Although I’d let it slide if they were Mega Bloks wires)

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They should have built a Lego pyramid, wouldn't have needed the cables.

[–] HuePony@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

It would cost like new data center

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

when a lego project calls for a civil engineer

[–] picnicolas@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 day ago

When a Lego loving kid becomes a civil engineer

[–] Alexfire@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

At first I thought the base of it was blurred out for some reason lol!

[–] Hal@piefed.nz 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Damn, and I thought I was doing well building from the floor to the ceiling. Mine was freestanding though, it didn't need cranes to hold it up.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The cranes aren’t holding it up the cable stays are keeping it from falling over.

[–] Hal@piefed.nz 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sorry you're right, it's not cranes and they aren't holding it up just keeping it steady. But my tower didn't need that, I built it strong enough it could atand of it's own accord.

Only to the ceiling, mind you. I don't have enough lego to go up 36 metres.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Theirs is strong enough to stand it’s just not stable enough to.

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Weird distinction. I could pile concrete blocks 5 miles up. They are strong enough, just not stable enough. So, this would be the tallest supported lego structure.

If you stacked them into a five mile high pyramid they’d be strong enough and stable enough too.

[–] Ascend910@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you tried designing a TMD system to keep a tower stright at all times

[–] Hal@piefed.nz 1 points 21 hours ago

I wonder if there's a separate record that doesn't allow the cables, where teams need to use these kinds of things to prevent it falling. Would probably have to be done indoors, away from wind.

My brother and I did the same thing once as kids. God, that was a blast. Dad even helped us put the last bricks at the top.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (4 children)

How tall can a lego structure get before the base bricks fail?

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

the corridor crew has a video on this and they mention the hydraulic press experiment @9:40 and added some cool visuals

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68oXafUzirE

spoiler~375'000 bricks ~ 3.6km

And in the end, they show a pyramid around that height (4x higher than Burj Khalifa, just smaller than the mount Fuji) and how much it would cost, which is completely unrealistic at that point, as it'd use up all the oil in the world.

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

I don't have numbers for you, but here's some Lego vs. a hydraulic press and it survives pretty well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l10hJxV4SGo

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago

At least as tall as a traffic cone I'd say.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Well they're on a wide base to distribute load among many bricks.

Do this enough and the only limit is bricks melting under the heat of the pressure.

Incoming sibling to wreck that tower

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] AviAdi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

It's fantastic!