this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2026
369 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

87924 readers
3653 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In January, the New York Police Department’s counterterrorism unit sent out a memo warning police officers about a new potential “security and counterintelligence” threat: Ray-Ban Meta glasses.

The memo directed officers to “conduct thorough inspections of all eyewear permitted within inmate cells” and cautioned that people who have been arrested could use these glasses, equipped with small cameras and microphones, to record inside police facilities. The memo cited two examples of such videos posted on social media.

“The ability to covertly record inside a law enforcement or detention facility, could result in a security risk if proprietary information about cell layouts, camera placements, or officer patrol/site protection routines are released,” the memo read.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] communism@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 hour ago

For recording in cells, the glasses would be caught by the regular scanners used at various security boundaries including upon entry to custody, at least every time I've been detained. Is that not normal in the US?

I mean, critical support to Meta I guess. They finally figured out a real use case for their glasses. Albeit a very limited one because there's already hidden cameras people can wear on their body, all of which are easily detectable when they search you before chucking you into a cell.

[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

That’s why they’re worried about them??…. That’s a huge ass obvious red flag if we’ve ever seen one

Oh, no. That's terrible. Nobody should ever be recording the police........ It might catch them breaking a law or two /s

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

“The ability to covertly record inside a law enforcement or detention facility, could result in a security risk if proprietary information about cell layouts, camera placements, or officer patrol/site protection routines are released,” the memo read.

what a load of absolute shit. the devices could open them up to the legal consequences of their illegal actions and abuse.

shame meta is focused on equipping the perverts and creeps instead of the blind and exposing corruption and abuse.

Any inmate leaving the facility could describe all of that without glasses.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 23 points 4 hours ago

One of the few things they’d be good for

Remember when body cams were meant to protect the police from accused wrongdoing?

Now anytime a body cam is not worn or activated it means the cops are planning to or are actively engaging in hurting someone.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Oh no, that would be going tooo Farr...

Dead ass I wish the worse for many in power.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 99 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 hours ago

META being used for good? IDK, sounds far fetched...

Boo hoo, go cry about it, ACAB

[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 152 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

But I thought the surveillance state was good for us? Why, do the police have something to hide?

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 5 points 4 hours ago

There are a great many cases where people have used tech to catch police in a lie, and naturally the police charge them with serious felonies for it. This goes back decades, and in shitoly jurisdictions is just in your face corruption.

[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 36 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"it was supposed to be us who do the surveillance, not zuck!"

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Was gonna say just that. They're all for surveillance technology as long as they are in control. Surveillance for thee...

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago

And I was told only perverts would want to secretly record their surroundings.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 26 points 7 hours ago

Huh, finally a use for Meta smart glasses I can get behind.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 17 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

That story reads exactly how I would draft a Meta PR campaign to diffuse opposition to those surveillance glasses.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 71 points 10 hours ago

Police have things to hide??

/s

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 34 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

I've said it before, but if these things weren't hooked up to a corporate cloud they would be great for sousveillance of the police and other authorities.

There're some out there from other manufacturers that have open source firmware, unfortunately they aren't cheap.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 3 points 3 hours ago

Unfortunately, using ethical versions will still contribute to the normalization of the non-ethical options, because people won't know the difference at a glance (or care).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

proprietary information about cell layouts, camera placements, or officer patrol/site protection routines are released

All semi-valid concerns. Is anybody else smothering from the overwhelming mass of concerns between-the-lines here?

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Someone with a good memory and reasonable drawing skills could get all that info without needing the glasses. Besides that, how many of those items could be discovered with a FOIA request? I'm sure building plans and stuff are filed with the county permitting office.

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 20 points 8 hours ago

Don’t worry, The Zuck will just add a feature to automatically blur cops and ICE agents

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago

"secretly". They aren't exactly subtle.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 19 points 9 hours ago (3 children)
[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 3 points 5 hours ago

These things should not exist, but if they must then they should be put to this sort of use.

Enjoy your levitating cat.

[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Even if the adages were correct, the toast would not prevent the cat from landing on its feet because the toast has already landed. It's landed on the cat's back.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 4 hours ago

I was going to say: the Chi of the cat overpowers the Chi of the toast. While buttered toast may be strong enough to influence its own destiny during a fall (and I would suspect it's the butter on the toast doing that...), the cat is an altogether much stronger master of its destiny during the fall and whatever weak influence the butter on the toast has would be overpowered by the life-force of the cat.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You could make the same argument that it had landed on the plate therefore you're safe.

there's always another landing, or more concisely, another opportunity for the butter to hit the floor.

It's not about the landing; it's about the wet side hitting the ground, making a mess, and making it less appetizing.

[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

The joke is about tying the toast to the cat to make a flying machine. If the toast is on the cat it has already landed. If the toast falls off the cat then the cat can land on its feet and the toast can land butter side up, no paradox

[–] kender242@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago

Please don't teach LEO's to levitate, I don't think they need super powers.

"You could power a planet by hooking a turbine to her right now. That's how much she's spinning in this grave"

[–] Alexfire@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

There are other hidden recording devices maybe they already check for all those.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 4 hours ago

Like a cell phone in a shirt pocket?

[–] notsure@fedia.io 12 points 9 hours ago (2 children)
[–] notsure@fedia.io 28 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

For older users, I quite literally laughed out loud

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 14 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

“Oh my god. I laughed out loud. I’m not kidding.”

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ekky@sopuli.xyz 11 points 9 hours ago

As a relict from the past millennia, I'd like to thank you for your service.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›