She's filming him with her phone while pointing a gun at him and yet he still continues the encounter. Anger is a hell of a drug. It's why getting people angry is such a potent political propaganda tool. It suppresses all critical thinking skills and drives action through rage.
this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
176 points (92.7% liked)
Fuck Cars
16567 readers
925 users here now
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Anger and fear is what the media sells. It's how you make effective propaganda.
Reading comments on this story on other platforms the conservatives and MAGATs sure don't seem to like it when the rabbit has the gun
The problem with having a gun is if you aren't prepared to use it someone can take it and turn it against you and your family. An incident that may not require deadly force to resolve becomes one of us or them of an agressor does not back down.
Very happy to live in a society and location that is less violent and where we don't generally solve confrontations with firearms. But can't say I wouldn't act the same if I lived in a dying empire on the verge of social and economic collapse.
where we don’t generally solve confrontations with firearms
... your police and military solve confrontations with firearms, and most buy those firearms and other weaponry from the USA, the largest arms dealer on Earth, making more firearms than China, Russia, Germany, France, and more combined.
Of course the USA is riddled with gun violence, as it arms the world, with every state in the union involved in the arms industry (even Hawaii).
Think of the USA as a beehive, and weapons are the honey.
It wasn't over a parking spot at all, but yes one was technically involved. It was an aggressive guy threatening to violate a woman who had kids in her car. She had a gun and the law on her side (every one in the US is familiar with Florida's stand your ground laws) and he was brave. She could have ticked him off in any way possible, but it was ultimately his anger issues that lead to his death.
He fucked around. He found out. All because he had the selfishness of a toddler.
Isn't this that FAFO that They love to talk about?
I just hate that she had to kill a person. Any emotionally stable person would be injured by that.
Title is misleading, there was a conflict over a parking space which resulted in the guy charging at her despite multiple warnings so she shot
It wasn't like she gave him 1 warning and shot him either, he pursued and stalked her, while she retreated and repeated her warnings multiple times.
There's no doubt in my mind that if she had no gun, he would have assaulted her, or worse.
Anyone who doubts that, hasn't watched the video.
I get it, but what if he also had a gun? And what if in the shooting some bystanders got killed? With Guns for everyone you always get worse results on average
If he had a gun? Then she would be dead without hers.
The part you're missing: we don't live in a perfect world. We live in this world. The one where crazy men will do crazy shit. Arm yourself or not, those crazy men are among us.
That's true, but without guns and with American police you get marginalized people like her murdered by white vets with impunity. See, e.g., This Non-violent Stuff'll Get You Killed. We can't push for a utopia where marginalized people magically stop being marginalized.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Imagine being killed, or killing someone, over a parking space at Walmart. Very American and Patriotic.
Whatever one's opinion on the legality - he wasnt killed over a parking spot. He was killed because he was threatening bodily harm to another person. This incident may had been triggered by a parking space, but after really has nothing to do with either cars or parking spaces. It shouldn't even be a post in this community.
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(75 replies)
Being from the northeast, I am not a supporter of our more southern states' obsession with "Stand your Ground" laws. That said, I am impressed that they actually applied this fairly, given the shooter was a black woman and the target was an older white male!
Even Massachusetts has a version of SYG, but it’s limited to your home and the Castle Doctrine. Self defense is a human right and a single punch can kill a person. I have no problem with a person shooting someone who is making active threats against them and approaching them in a threatening manner. Good shoot. Happy the innocent woman gets to go home and violent thug can’t victimize anymore people because of his fragile ego.
load more comments
(7 replies)
A Florida woman who fatally shot a man in the parking lot of a Walmart during a confrontation over a parking space won't face charges, prosecutors announced Thursday.
The Broward County State Attorney's Office said Florida's "stand your ground" law makes the shooter, who said she was acting in self-defense, immune from prosecution in connection with the June 30 shooting in North Lauderdale.
Bart Diguglielmo, 62, was shot and killed in the incident, which was captured on several videos, including from cellphones and a Tesla, according to a memo on the shooting released Thursday by the Broward County State Attorney's Office.
Man fatally shot in Walmart parking lot following dispute over parking space: Authorities
"A dispute over a parking space. In a Walmart parking lot. The facts surrounding the June 30, 2026, homicide of Bart DiGuglielmo are as tragic as they are absurd," Broward State Attorney's Office Homicide Trial Unit Division Chief Stephen Zaccor wrote in the memo. "There is relatively no dispute about what actually happened because the entire incident was captured by various video recording devices."
The shooter, identified in the memo as Melissa Payne, was driving with her niece and niece's baby when she and Diguglielmo got into a "brief stalemate" after attempting to park in the same spot, the memo said.
A still included in the Broward County State Attorney's Office memo on a shooting in a Walmart parking lot in North Lauderdale, Florida, June 30, 2026.
Broward County State Attorney's Office
DiGuglielmo "inexplicably abandoned his car in the through lane of travel" and went into the store, before shortly returning to his vehicle, according to the memo. Multiple witnesses reported hearing him say he was going to "mess her car up" and "---- her s--- up," before driving off at a high rate of speed, parking and then walking toward Payne's vehicle, according to the memo. A witness described him as being "visibly angry" while looking at Payne, according to the memo.
Payne exited her vehicle holding a phone in her left hand and a firearm in her right and said, per a witness, "If you keep coming up to me, I'm going to ------- shoot you!" the memo stated.
The witness reported that "despite those warnings," DiGuglielmo continued to approach, and video showed him "aggressively approach" Payne, according to the memo.
A still included in the Broward County State Attorney's Office memo on a shooting in a Walmart parking lot in North Lauderdale, Florida, June 30, 2026.
Broward County State Attorney's Office
DiGuglielmo "continued his pursuit" as Payne backed away from him, according to the memo. He is seen on video continuing to pursue her and "motioned as if he was going to damage" her vehicle with his keys, according to the memo.
DiGuglielmo turned back and then approached Payne, at which point she fired her gun, striking him in the abdomen, according to the memo.
Payne was on the phone with her husband during the shooting, who told authorities that she said, "Bae, I shot. Call the cops," according to the memo.
She was briefly taken into custody by the Broward Sheriff's Office and her "recitation of the facts was consistent with the various sources of video evidence," the memo stated. She was released after stating she acted in self-defense, prosecutors said.
In an analysis of the incident, Zaccor stated that Payne was "in a public place, a Walmart parking lot, and therefore was in a place she had a right to be." She further is not a convicted felon and had a right to possess a firearm, "therefore she was not doing anything unlawful at the time she used deadly force," he wrote.
"Accordingly," Zaccor continued, Payne "had the right to stand her ground if she was in reasonable fear of death or great bodily harm." Based on the evidence, the state is unable to prove that her fear of great bodily harm was "not reasonable," he wrote, citing DiGuglielmo's actions.
Zaccor said that because Florida is a stand-your-ground state, Payne "did not have to wait to be attacked before resorting to deadly force. She did not have to retreat as long as her fear was reasonable and no evidence has been presented to disprove that."
So, that attorney is actually not entirely correct. There still needs to be a threat of death or great bodily injury to meet the standard of deadly force even when "Standing Your Ground," this honestly doesn't seem to meet that standard. She would still have the right to defend herself using normal force, which is things like OC spray or regular ol' fighting, but without him presenting a deadly threat she wasn't legally allowed to respond with deadly force.
I mean, good for her that the DA neglected to bring charges, but don't try this at home, because if your DA is having a bad day you're going to jail until your court date at least.
The state was not able to prove in a court of law that there was not sufficient evidence to disprove that she was afraid of death or great bodily injury in this confrontation.
We can armchair quarterback all day. Imo it is a stupid law that increases violence. But as long as they have it, it should be applied fairly.
That isn't the standard though, just "being afraid" isn't enough, you have to be "reasonably afraid." As in a jury (or in this case prosecutors in the DA's office), would believe not that you feared, but that your fear was reasonable. In most cases that means something like "he has a weapon" or "multiple attackers," even threats would have to be more specifically death threats than "I'll fuck you up" or some such nonsense.
In this case, the DA's office was feeling lenient today, tomorrow with an identical case they may not be, you go ahead and try it if you want lol won't be me in prison. Hell, maybe you'll get away with it too, good luck!
load more comments
(1 replies)
There is relatively no dispute about what actually happened because the entire incident was captured by various video recording devices.
This sentence is relatively not good.
I'm nominating this as the most American thing that happened all week.
Community, this morning I see a lot of Anti-gun and Anti-stand your ground sentiment. I think it's unfair to bring what this woman did with her gun to the conversation. We should feel more empathy for her situation in that moment. She felt threatened and she dealt with that issue the way she was trained.
As a Fuck Cars community we need to focus on this situation as an example of how the car creates animosity between people. If both individuals arrived there in a different form of transportation, they may have not crossed paths like this. However, because it was in a car it created friction. I experience this friction in my day to day life and that's why I hate cars. Please let's focus on that as a community, let's focus on how the automobile divides us, makes us angry, tears apart our community. That's the point of this post, IMHO.
Thank you, and I'm sorry for arguing all morning. Good day.
load more comments
(4 replies)
so, who won the parking spot?
I'd say she did or he wouldn't have been so mad. But really by default she would be declared the winner, because he's fuckin' dead.
She owns it now? :d
view more: next ›