this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
31 points (94.3% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

47367 readers
1463 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm talking like the local paper that gives out free copies at every coffee shop and corner store.

See, I got a new neighbor, two doors down, and he's a RSO.

But the only articles about his arrest and conviction are in a small town newspaper, and they want $83/yr for me to be able to read this article. From two years ago.

I know that sometimes RSO lists can be bullshit. Is this guys charge bullshit? I have no way of knowing. Nor do I have any way of knowing if my kids are his target demographic.

The only other thing I could find was his sister and parents sueing him for custodial rights over his kids following a DV call...Which makes me think his victims were his own kids (so statistically unlikely to attack a neighborhood child, especially once everyone is onto him), or that it's all made up family drama.

I just want to know what I'm dealing with. Wtf. Why does everything need to be paywalled?

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

$83 subscription for online access to a free local paper is insane.

Check with your local library. They often maintain subscriptions or have an archive of local newpapers.

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

| $83 subscription for online access to a free local paper is insane.

If it's anything like our "free" paper, the hardcopy has half the article with the rest on their website.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You just brought me back in time to honors history in highschool where I needed to go to the historical society library and had to use their microfilm to get stuff from an old newspaper.

I wonder if they still have microfilm now, or even put new papers onto it. It seems so archaic nowadays.

I remember a librarian telling me they were slowly moving from microfiche to network storage, but I wouldn't be at all surprised to find that there's plenty of microfiche left collecting dust.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago

I don't think new stuff goes to microfiche, and the old stuff has probably mostly been scanned by how and just sits in an archive somewhere.

Of course I'm sure that depends on the size of the library.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Imo it is either a $83/year local paper or a free local newspaper. They can't have it both ways if you ask me.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I got like two thirds through the original post before it clicked what RSO stood for (registered sex offender). Is that a common acronym?

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am annoyed that this comment does not explain what an RSO is.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 3 points 1 day ago

Registered sex offender

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

Journalists need to be paid, same as everyone else. Especially in small towns with small resources. These are the kinds of things to support imo.

[–] Yew@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Check the page in archive.org

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All kids are potentially in danger from any stranger, regardless of whether they’re an RSO. Assume there is a danger until proven otherwise.

Sex offender information is public information in most places. The local newspaper is charging you for their journalism and reporting, but their source is free, public information you yourself can access.

You can be placed on the sex offender registry for public urination. RSO doesn’t mean they’re a paedophile. But until proven otherwise, keep a close eye on your kids.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago

All kids are potentially in danger from any stranger, regardless of whether they’re an RSO. Assume there is a danger until proven otherwise.

Imma stop you there. Stranger Danger is responsible for socially crippling several generations now.

While I get an inkling that pedophilia is probably more common than anyone wants to admit...I also know that statistically, almost all offenses take a pre-established position of trust. Kids getting plucked off the street by strangers is incredibly rare...especially in the day and age of Flock and doorbell cameras...because you know they'd be screaming that from the rooftops every time it happened.

Your eyeballs are unprotected for the printed ads. Your browser needs a couple of plugins and they're gone.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you can access the article but there's a paywall, you may be able to use ublock origin to block the JavaScript on the page. Firefox's reader mode also works sometimes.