110
submitted 1 year ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] masterairmagic@sh.itjust.works 57 points 1 year ago

It's probably faster than an airplane if you also factor in the time lost at airports going through meaningless queues.

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago

n China, the trains are awesome and pretty much everything else sucks hard.

Chinese train stations are a fucking nightmare compared to the rest of the world. First, they have a funneled entrance from the subway that goes through multiple choke points. For example, at Shanghai Hongqiao, you're in a mob of hundreds, forced to go up two long escalators.

Next, people there don't have freedom of travel, so there is a security check to actually enter the station, where they look at your papers and make sure you're approved for your destination. The queues are super long and people constantly cut in line. It's rage-inducing.

Then they subject you to a baggage check, metal detector, and frisking.

Now you're inside the station, but you can't just go to the platform. Instead, you wait at a secure gate until maybe ten minutes before scheduled departure. Again, it's a giant mob of people, trying to form a line in a station that's also just overcrowded. They finally open the gate and everyone rushes through and down to the platform.

You have to arrive an hour ahead of your train's departure else you're going to have a very stressful time.

I

[-] zurchpet@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Sounds just like taking a flight at an airport.

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Also hellish

[-] Smatt@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago
[-] victron@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

This guy this guys

[-] 5redie8@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

people there don't have freedom of travel

What?

[-] socsa@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Oh wow, another person on Lemmy who has actually been to China.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

That's the huge advantage of trains in my opinion. Instead of having to drive out to the airport, and deal with check in, boarding, and so on, you just go to the train station downtown and get off downtown of the city you want to go to. That alone saves a ton of time and hassle.

[-] Che_Donkey@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Than and Bar Car!

pretty countryside with an ice cold beer in hand is amazing

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Trains are awesome in general. This train in particular looks freaking great!

[-] andruid@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Some airports are located closer to cities downtowns for this reason.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

That's not very common for a good reason given that airports create a lot of noise pollution.

[-] andruid@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Are airports louder than train stations? Near freight trains and air port and the freight trains are much worse for me personally. Though I would hope passenger train systems are designed for less noise.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] thejml@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I worry that the more useful and prevalent high speed trains become, the more the population will use them… and the more likely the long useless queues will also move to trains.

Trains can have more stations to spread out the load, but then they won’t be as high speed.

Still, I’ll happily take advantage of the currently short queues.

[-] masterairmagic@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

In airports it's usually the security theater that causes the long queues.

[-] lemann@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

I feel that could be resolved by adjusting ticket prices and providing alternative options, like regional buses/coaches. Another possibility is adding more doors to each carriage, spreading out queues across the platform, but at the cost of less seating

Where I am, the regional/inter-city train costs are very competitive with the alternatives, and sometimes enable more flexibility with travel. It's still nowhere near the affordability of some parts of Asia though, and is overpriced IMO. My biggest gripe though has got to be only 2 doors on each carriage side, one at either end. And they're narrow AF, good luck carrying a bike on board. What sadist designed these trains 😭

[-] geemili@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I think this is unlikely to happen. Going through security is one of the big sources of useless queues at airports, which trains don't have. Trains also tend to have more doors to get, which should reduce the length of queues to get on the train.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 7 points 1 year ago
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/shorts/zY14lV824tQ?feature=share

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[-] masterairmagic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Canada is pathetic.

[-] Electricorchestra@lemmy.ml 52 points 1 year ago

I wish when governments said they want to be competitive with China they did like the one thing China does that would raise our quality of life. As in make trains.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 26 points 1 year ago

People: Can we have competitive with china [trains]?

Governments: we have Competitive with china at home.

Competitive with china at home: Low wages and no labor rights.

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Don't forget surveillance and erasure of minorities!

[-] iopq@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

China: working from 9 to 9 six days a week, with lower wages

[-] hellishharlot@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

And there are some Americans working similarly because they have rent to pay

[-] iopq@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

So you're saying they are getting paid for overtime

[-] kittenspronkles@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Probably working 2 jobs without OT

[-] iopq@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Chinese only get one salary and still expected to work that much

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't consider US min wage with US prices a whole salary.

[-] iopq@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

In 2021, 1.4% of workers in the United States were paid hourly rates at or below the official minimum wage. The percentage of hourly paid workers earning the prevailing federal minimum wage or less declined from 1.9% in 2019 to 1.5% in 2020, which remains well below the percentage of 13.4 recorded in 1979. Around 44.3 percent of wage and salary workers paid hourly rates at or below the federal minimum wage were aged between 16 to 24 years.

https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/minimum-wage/2020/home.htm

[-] hellishharlot@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

In the US it's usually 2 part time jobs or 1 ft and 1 or or 1 ft and gigs. Regardless the idea isn't that they make enough with one job and get spending money from the other. It's basically that you need to make as much as the top 15% of earners in the US to be ok in most areas. So we work as hard as we can to survive

[-] iopq@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Big cities like Beijing or Shanghai in China are much worse, lower wages and rents north of $1000 and salaries of about $1350

Workers cram into one apartment just to have a place to sleep

[-] hellishharlot@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

You must not have ever seen a couple of folks making min wage renting a room just to survive. America may not be quite at that disparity level but it is rapidly approaching

[-] iopq@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Couple of folks? There are like a dozen workers bunking in Beijing apartments because it's just not affordable

[-] zephyrvs@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

I remember how maglev was supposed to be the future when I was growing up but most European projects went way over budget and were eventually scrapped so I'm really happy to see that the Chinese finished this thing and that it actually works and delivers in terms of speed.

This feels so much more futuristic than boring tunnels.

[-] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, the west’s political systems disincentivize projects that take longer than an election cycle. Everyone needs short term wins to secure re-election and it has stopped us from doing most things that inherently take a long time to show results.

[-] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

And all the NIMBY's who definitely don't want a train line going "here" where they live, since it would be way better "there". And then the local politicians who listen to them.

[-] silly_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

My knowledge might be outdated but my understanding is that maglev is still unreliable and frequently breaks down or has to operate at slower speeds. Not yet a completely mature technology I think... but very interesting for sure.

[-] silly_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

My knowledge might be outdated but my understanding is that maglev is still unreliable and frequently breaks down or has to operate at slower speeds. Not yet a completely mature technology I think... but very interesting for sure.

[-] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Nice to read a wholesome post about China once in a while

[-] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

I hope there are not too many tunnels or that they found a way to relieve the pressure when going through them at high speed. This is a thing I noticed in France when taking the TGV (300kmh), when going inside tunnels at a rather high speed, there is a lot of pressure, it kind of feels like a plane landing, but shorter and more intense

[-] heird@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Tom Scott just did a video recently of the Japanese Maglev in which it goes to 500km/h so 310mph meaning it was faster than this Chinese test...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
110 points (91.0% liked)

Technology

34779 readers
234 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS