6
submitted 11 months ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/steamdeck@lemmy.ml
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kennocha@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

I really do love my steam deck, but more importantly for me, I am excited to see all the effects of gaming becoming more viable in Linux.

I reaaaaally dislike windows at this point.

[-] Cmar@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Steam Deck using Linux puts it above anything else in the handheld category. It’s truly a device you yourself can do anything with, with no limitations or hard locks.

Not to mention the sw and hw support which both are excellent.

Realising that there is absolutely no way for me to, for instance, make a local backup of saves / settings, not even a way to access them on my Switch is a very sobering experience.

[-] Kerred@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Has any info been leaked about the profit margin Steam Decks are for Valve?

I get it's a loss leader to increase Steam software purchases, but would be neat to know how much of any they earn per deck.

[-] TheYang@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Has any info been leaked about the profit margin Steam Decks are for Valve?

Well, seems like it's very unlikely that they lose money the more Decks they sell, I'd expect the 64gb model to go out at pretty much their cost per device.

The Markup between the 512 model and the 64gb model is much higher than any OEM cost I would expect, so there's probably a little margin in there.

[-] AToM_exe@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

The article doesn't say much but that the price is better then their competitions and that it runs on Linux.

Their is so much more to it.

[-] Kerred@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Has any info been leaked about the profit margin Steam Decks are for Valve?

I get it's a loss leader to increase Steam software purchases, but would be neat to know how much of any they earn per deck.

[-] Sourweasel@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago

I’ll pick one up once they release a model with OLED. My Nintendo Switch has it, and it would be really hard to go back.

[-] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I prefer the hundreds of games I already own on steam and the ability to own my system and customize it as I see fit, but to each their own. Ifixit sells screens, they might release an OLED one at some point for people who want it, but I wouldn't hold my breath for it.

[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

That's it? I mean I definitely think the Switch is a good option for "normies" but Steam Deck has a long long list of advantages that I feel can overcome a subpar display...

[-] randomname01@feddit.nl 1 points 11 months ago
[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

I'll be surprised if it's that soon. Most consoles have 6-7 year life cycles.

[-] icesentry@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago

Is the steam deck really comparable to a traditional console?

[-] One_Large_Dumple@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

we'll soon see I think, Valve has said they want this to be more of a traditional console-style lifespan, and they've also said they don't see a reason to release a Steam Deck 2 unless they can get a significant performance bump, as of right now having a hardware target for devs to aim/optimize for is a really good benefit

plus if the devs optimize a game for Steam Deck those optimizations help for other handheld gaming PCs even if they're more powerful than the Deck

I'm super excited about a potential Steam Deck 2, I would love to see a better screen (quality, not so much resolution, maybe OLED) as well as a better battery life, and, of course, a more powerful APU... I wonder what the possibility of porting Proton to ARM is and switching to an ARM/Chiplet style CPU for the Deck 2

[-] arefx@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm happy to use my steam deck for the next few years but if they released a new steam deck in say 4 years and it had significantly better performance (like at least 900p 60fps in modern to the time games) I wouldn't even have to think about purchasing it I just would.

[-] DualPad@lemmy.one 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Me neither. I'd get the new one right away. And it's a PC so I can retire my Steam Deck to use to do for other things by then. It's a really great machine.

[-] SmallAlmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 months ago
[-] Sourweasel@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Burn-in is overhyped with the newer prevention tools. I’ve used my Switch for over 2000 hours, and I’ve yet to see any burn-in. I also have an OLED widescreen monitor that I’ve used for work and gaming 12 hours a day for the last two years, and it looks fantastic. Hard to go back when the colors are so much more accurate and vibrant.

[-] CaptainEffort@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

I don’t see that happening for a while, and tbh it still blows my mind that Nintendo prioritized OLED over any sort of performance upgrade. OLED is undeniably better looking, but it’s not worth it imo when some first party games can’t even hit 30 fps.

[-] redbullcat@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

That's the point. They've updated the only component that makes games looks nicer and more vibrant without touching anything on performance. They're maximising profit above all else.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
6 points (80.0% liked)

Steam Deck

5659 readers
63 users here now

Universal community link
!steamdeck@lemmy.ml

Rules

Order

Models

64GB eMMC LCD
256GB NVMe LCD
512GB NVMe LCD
512GB NVMe OLED
1TB NVMe OLED

Allowed languages

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS