0% packet loss is really impressive.
How can the caches of intermediate systems even be large enough to presumably store 100 seconds of incoming traffic?
Welcome to /c/SoftwareGore!
This is a community where you can poke fun at nasty software. This community is your go-to destination to look at the most cringe-worthy and facepalm-inducing moments of software gone wrong. Whether it's a user interface that defies all logic, a crash that leaves you in disbelief, silly bugs or glitches that make you go crazy, or an error message that feels like it was written by an unpaid intern, this is the place to see them all!
Remember to read the rules before you make a post or comment!
Community Rules - Click to expand
These rules are subject to change at any time with or without prior notice. (last updated: 7th December 2023 - Introduction of Rule 11 with one sub-rule prohibiting posting of AI content)
You should also check out these awesome communities!
0% packet loss is really impressive.
How can the caches of intermediate systems even be large enough to presumably store 100 seconds of incoming traffic?
Morse code link?
Satellite link?
Whatever your network topology is, the buffers are keeping all of the packets for reconnection, that's why you have 0% packet loss. So either you have very constrained links, and huge packet buffers, or you have very long links (moon and back a few times)
This was just a random slow down for around 5 minutes. Can't reproduce :(
Is that github? /s
we found the people using IPoAC