This so broad and vague as to be unconstitutional. It's like mandating that computers have to have technology that prevents hate speech. A 3d printer, like a computer, a hammer, a pencil, or the myriad of other tools humans use is just a general tool that can be put to good or bad uses. It would be insane to require anti-skull bashing technology for hammers and it is crazy to burden 3d printer manufacturers to develop technology to try to do this. Moreover, 3d printers are just one way to make ghost guns. A better way may be just home CNC. Instead of additive technology laying down layers of plastic one by one, with home CNC you can take a block of metal and machine it out, subtractive technology. The bill does not impact home CNC. So dumb!
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
We should pass a law that all knives have to know what purpose they are being used for and should refuse to be used for stabbing or otherwise hurting people.
And with machined metal, you might make something that can shoot more than one bullet that probably won’t explode in your face.
Are you somehow under the impression a 3D printed firearm will explode in your face?
All part of why the Democrat party is only slightly smaller bags of shit than the Republican party. Neither one is worth a damn. It's all about control, power, and keeping rich.
What you don't understand is that this is only about guns on the surface. This will enable every 3d printer manufacturer to harvest tons of data from everyone. To a point where the printer can not work without a connection to the server for security reasons by law.
You could buy a metal pipe and fill it with gun powder and you have a cheaper and more robust gun than a 3d printer could ever build.
But can you 3D print a guillotine?
Asking for a friend.
mandating that computers have to have technology that prevents hate speech.
What a brilliant idea, let's get on it immediately. 🤣
Joking aside, you are 100% right.
Except I think the idea of printing a gun is to avoid detection in metal detectors.
You do know that 3d printed guns are not 100% plastic, large chunks of them are just normal metal gun parts. I'm also wondering what you think bullets are made of?
Please don't repeat stupid shit like saying 3d printed guns go past metal detectors. It will hurt the 3d printing community.
I think the idea of printing a gun is to avoid detection in metal detector
Wrong.
The vast majority of these 3d printed guns use the fact that the registered "gun" is only a small part of the actual whole gun. You can buy barrels, magazines, slides, firing pins, etc, all mail order without any fuss — it's the part with the serial number that is actually the firearm and restricted. So if you print that part (which is often basically just a shell to hold the metal components in place) you have an unserialized gun that's basically just as good as one from a gun store.
Lol, do you realize that regular 2D printer manufacturers have mandates for embedding codes in the prints so that they can be traced?
Or that Photoshop and photo editing software has mandated counterfeit bill detection features in it?
It doesn't completely invalidate all of your points, but the idea is not as crazy or unprecedented as a hammer with anti murder technology. Hell even just basic cap guns have to have an orange tip.
As long as gun nuts kept insisting on designing and printing guns, this was inevitably going to happen. Like what the fuck did they think the end result of designing and distributing murder machines online was going to be?? Did they really think everyone, in every jurisdiction and country around the world, was going to agree with their dumbass Republican interpretation of the 2nd amendment?
They will do anything except properly regulate guns huh
No, California already does lots of gun regulation.
If anything, I think this is the result of a culture in which they're looking for ways to do more when there's no much more they can really do without federal changes.
It's fucked up. California legislators just do not really care about surveillance or civil rights at this this point.
I think this is the result of a culture in which they're looking for ways to do more
Well, except for actually effective policies like better access to mental health care and reducing socioeconomic inequality. Because that would take actual effort.
but we built a bunch of housing my property value might go down
this is a fair concern for any politician because landowners are primarily voters, but sometimes politicians need to fo things that are political suicide for the good of what they represent.
I think this is the result of a culture in which they’re looking for ways to do more
All gun control is about controlling the actions of citizens who already abide by the law.
Poverty, unemployment, drug abuse, mental health, and income inequality are the causes of gun violence. Treat those root causes, and it doesn't matter how many guns there are.
If gun ownership directly translated to gun violence, Finland and Switzerland would have many times the rates of gun violence as the US. In those countries, the total number of guns owned might be smaller, but the overall percentage of people who own guns is nearly 100%. Those countries don't have the same problems with gun violence because they address the real root causes of gun violence.
That law is impossible to follow and moronic.
You can't prevent a new unknown designs to be printed, and my guess is those are pretty trivial to make. And there is guaranteed to be workarounds. This is just enshittification by law.
My guess is that this law will not pass.
It'll pass, it just won't matter outside of California and the corporate entities 3D printing there.
You can still print guns out of your heavily modified Ender 9999 covered in a trash bag.
My guess is that this law will not pass.
Reread the first 5 words of the headline.
Sigh....
Now read a little further:
The bill must still pass through the California State Senate, and will pass through California governor Gavin Newsom's desk if it clears the Senate. Newsom can then either sign it into law, or veto it.
Yep. That's not just a stupid headline. It's flat out wrong.
Exactly
Now all the 3D printing bros get to experience what life is like as a firearm bro.
The laws are not so bad but it's the malicious compliance of retailers and manufacturers that will make your hobby nearly impossible.
Oh but if you have plenty of money there are no issues for you.
Hm nah this is mostly about commercial printers. As a 3d printer hobbieist I can build it from the ground up so I wouldn't care much
This is asinine.
Most of the hobbyist 3D printer market is not people who think that building 3D printers is fun and their primary hobby, it's people who bought them to print other stuff for them.
It's literally the entire reason Bambu has shot to popularity so fast.
The mechanical hardware build is no problem, building a controller and firmware is a different matter. This legislation is all about the firmware.
I have some experience with 3d printing equipment but I'm not sure I could build a controller from the ground up. To be fair, I've never really looked into it so maybe it's easier than it seems.
You can buy a controller at any place that sells motors or Arduinos. None of my printers have their stock controller.
The firmware most controllers run is often a modified version of one of the different open source 3d printer firmwares (klipper, Marlin, etc)
You can even choose to compile and flash the firmware yourself (often just load bin file to sdcard and insert into board)
But all of that is moot because the controller and firmware are not capable of that level of processing. You would have to implement it on the slicer level, and even that wouldn't work because most of them are open source.
True
That's stupid. Let's just build our own with FOSS.
This really seems like it's just a way to get DRM onto printers to stop people from printing replacement parts or 'copyrighted' materials.
Sounds so much like age limit to "protect the children". If that's seen as a good idea by the rest of the world's leaders... I hope my not-connected old printer will last as long as I!
Sick! They just made a stronger gun trafficking industry! This is a huge win for business minded career criminals. /S
My favorite thing about these super-specific gun laws is how we're 50 fiefdoms where none of it is ultimately enforceable.
Americans do not give a fuck. We're a violent people and if your kid gets hurt so we can have our toys, it's a-okay.
Uvalde Texas re-elected the police chief who let all those children die in that school shooting.