this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
45 points (95.9% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

7375 readers
447 users here now

/c/TenForward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. Use spoiler tags in comments, and NSFW checkbox for posts.
This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!theorville@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Does anyone else find the fetishization of mediation on TNG is kind of unrealistic at best and paternalistic at worst?

Just kind of gives the vibe of people that refuse to understand that populations are more than happy to fuck over other populations as a matter of conscious policy to maintain their own advantage.

These are the people that think, "All these people squabbling amongst themselves are stupid. We just need to get their leaders in a room and lock the door until they come to an agreement," as if there is always an even trade that a powerful population, that holds all the cards, can amicably make with an weak population that holds no cards because access to the deck has been denied them.

That all these social problems are not struggles to be fought and won, but puzzles to be solved by superior intellects.

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think you're feeling pessimistic, which is valid. But diplomacy works. And when it cannot work... the show also depicts xenocide.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hm. Maybe it's time to make a list of diplomacy episodes for me to ree-watch.

I watched so much TNG it's one of those shows that just sort of sits in my head and I don´t feel the need to watch it again because it quite alive in there, but it's lives in the perspective of a man 20 years younger than I am.

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Funny. I was a child when it was on air but I come from a conservative family that discounted the show as liberal nonsense (but still enjoyed it anyways... go figure). With my current perspective, TNG helps me cultivate optimism and belief in a better future in which diplomacy trumps violence.

But hey, maybe starships were a metaphor for nuclear weapons and you have to talk things out when every group of people has access to a doomsday weapon. Remember: peace... through superior firepower.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes, you've kind of highlighted my key philosophical and political with problem, of which TNG is the most egregious example.

The arc of history does NOT bend toward justice. Believing so lulls us into complacency and laziness. Eventually, if we just wait long enough, we will achieve utopia by default, no need to do much about it.

Of course, if TNG inspires you believe such a thing as possible, and thereby motivates you to WORK towards it, great! But I find more often it acts as a sedative.

The West Wing might be a good comparison for someone looking at how fictional narratives act as a social nepenthe. Like, yes, a good portion of those fans saw the discrepancy between the show and reality and worked to change it, but how many people were just happy to have the show? How many people saw the West Wing and didn't notice that it is absolutely not how America's politics operate and left every episode feeling happy that right always prevails.

And the whole aversion to violence is completely ahistorical fantasy, as far as I can tell, but very convenient for a class of people who have achieved everything they need materially but would like to maintain a sense of moral superiority while maintaining the status quo that they benefit from (see: New York Times editorial page).

Personally, I don't believe in progress. I think it's a myth. Technology is a glittering lure trapping us in a future that will never come, and that lure shines brightest in TNG. I believe societies rise and fall and there are mechanisms underneath it all that we can effectively do nothing about (including getting swept up in them). I don´t think humanity is groping towards perfection, but will continue to rise and fall until a catastrophe we foresaw and failed to prevent paves the way for the Age of Polydactyl Cats.

But I do love Star Trek because it is ABOUT this shit in a way many shows are not, even if I don't agree with their take; and often they'll at least RAISE objections to their own premise, sometimes answered, sometimes not. And, of course, weĺl always have DS9.

[–] kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I enjoy watching TNG as an idealized, utopic society. If every conflict was realistic and messy, it would lose a lot of its identity and charm for me

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah, it would be a bummer if the Enterprise just left behind systems in permanent war or genocide every third episode, or if a show had to turn into a seventeen-parter to get all the nuance right.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A LOT of TNG always came across as naive oversimplification, to the point I found it hard to watch even when it was new.

[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

The one thing about Star Trek that I've always had to sort of ignore in order to enjoy it is that they're supposed to be living in a post-scarcity society where nobody uses money, but they still have people that do the absolute shit miserable jobs that nobody wants to do today.

Voyager touched on this when they had sentient holograms in perpetual servitude cleaning, Picard touched on it in the creation of "Freecloud" and DS9 touched on it with all the ferengi stuff...

But it's never explained why people like Joseph Sisco are running restaurants for free, why Picard 'owns' Chateau Picard, etc...

Nor is it explained why when Nog goes to Disco's restaurant he is using his transporter credits...free?

There's a lot in-universe that is unexplained and comes down to naive idealism, but that doesn't mean that we as a society can't strive towards it.

Someone smarter than I once said "practice doesn't make perfect, but practice does make better."

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

TNG = traps not guns