this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2026
36 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

32 readers
39 users here now

The latest news and developments on Firefox and Mozilla, a global non-profit that strives to promote openness, innovation and opportunity on the web.

You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Related

Rules

While we are not an official Mozilla community, we have adopted the Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines as far as it can be applied to a bin.

Rules

  1. Always be civil and respectful
    Don't be toxic, hostile, or a troll, especially towards Mozilla employees. This includes gratuitous use of profanity.

  2. Don't be a bigot
    No form of bigotry will be tolerated.

  3. Don't post security compromising suggestions
    If you do, include an obvious and clear warning.

  4. Don't post conspiracy theories
    Especially ones about nefarious intentions or funding. If you're concerned: Ask. Please don’t fuel conspiracy thinking here. Don’t try to spread FUD, especially against reliable privacy-enhancing software. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Show credible sources.

  5. Don't accuse others of shilling
    Send honest concerns to the moderators and/or admins, and we will investigate.

  6. Do not remove your help posts after they receive replies
    Half the point of asking questions in a public sub is so that everyone can benefit from the answers—which is impossible if you go deleting everything behind yourself once you've gotten yours.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] furzegulo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 5 days ago (2 children)

well let mozilla die and firefox to be taken over by a true non-profit, who only cares about making the browser better and discards all the other fucking shit shit that mozilla is trying to do

[–] ByteMe@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago

I have something better. Rip off the whole top Mozilla managers and give the job to people who actually care

[–] trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 days ago

They need a massive number of devs for that. In order to finance that massive number of devs without a Google deal, they would need to do even more on top that you would dislike.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 22 points 5 days ago

Mozilla's dependency on Google has apparently warped their activism into fighting against these antitrust lawsuits since early 2025:

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Then Firefox has failed. What Firefox should be would always benefit from the destruction of the Corporate Web.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 5 days ago

It won't cause the destruction of the corporate web. It would cause the destruction of the open web.

[–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 days ago

Badly designed antitrust measures can reduce competition. Considering the influence of lobbyists, we have to consider that the system is working as intended.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

i gave to mozilla not because of their search deal with google but because they actively sought to fight back against toxicity on the web and internet bro culture but the new ceo backtracked on that.

go back to championing a not for profit, people first, anti toxic internet instead of relying on corporations to be your sugar daddy and you'll survive.

[–] ByteMe@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

i mean i use librewolf but i'm talking about the whole of the mozilla organisation, which focuses on positive change and evangelism for the internet.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ya know, even if Mozilla set up a search engine selection prompt and set up “pay for placement” model, they could still get paid. They just wouldn’t make as much $$ because the deal wouldn’t be exclusive to one provider.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 4 points 5 days ago

There are some pretty strong indicators that every search engine in Firefox is due to some kind of opaque under-the-table deal.