this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
36 points (100.0% liked)

Science

23877 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Hexbear's science community!

Subscribe to see posts about research and scientific coverage of current events

No distasteful shitposting, pseudoscience, or COVID-19 misinformation.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kisstrel@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hopefully they engineer the plants so that the seeds only germinate through some human means, that way they don't spread unmanaged and fuck up ecosystems. But very cool idea.

[–] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There’s an American company doing similar, a couple years ago I had some sort of flowering plant that glowed, I think it was a petunia, it was awesome but I’m not great at keeping plants alive.

Replacing street lamps is a hilarious fantasy though. They glow enough to look fucking awesome but not enough to see.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

if you just need to see where the right-of-way is some dimly glowing stuff can replace streetlights

[–] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 2 points 6 days ago

That’s true, they could help with that. Not enough to light the street, but enough to show you where the street isn’t.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

I need this in my life.

[–] Jabril@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pretty old news, these were some of the first experiments with gene editing being done quite awhile ago, maybe over a decade. They've even made glowing animals with the same techniques although those are not publicly available for purchase

[–] AlmightyDoorman@kbin.earth 1 points 2 days ago

I think they are based on GFP but there is https://www.glofish.com/

[–] Hillary_Clinton@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] fox@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

For lighting things nearby? Basically useless. For making super fucking cool botanical gardens? Extremely viable. It's also a great exercise in modifying the genes of plants in novel ways, which is in and of itself promising. Consider a plant that produces silk, or a plant that produces a complete protein as a crop, on top of the usual benefits like drought/disease resistance and increased yields.

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] fox@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

Go look at the article, there's a video of the plants and you can see how much light they emit

[–] TheFinalCapitalist@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

Even if they dont give off great light, the aesthetics of a well cared for garden with glowing plants highlighting a path during dusk/night would be so fuckin cool

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

They keep mentioning fertilizer in the article I assume they need a lot

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 week ago

No. They didn't. Those images are super over exposed. These plants only just barely glow and are nowhere even remotely close to being bright enough to provide any sort of meaningful light.

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

There's a number of plant species with naturally occurring bioluminescence