I wasn't trying to pick fights. It's an odd situation. After I posted the post had a good amount of up votes and replies from many different people. The comment section was unusually fast moving for Lemmy and it was entirely positive and supporting. Then it was deleted by the mod.

After that I made a post calling that out as strange behavior without bothering to read it or say a word in such a slow moving community on a post attracting users to interact with that community. Many of the same other users picked up the conversations we had been having in the first post there, and once again many other users replied. Everything was positive between all of the users. Several questioned the mod doing that without reading the post, but no one said anything offensive towards anyone at all.

Then that post was also removed, and I was permanently banned for the community for a falsified reason. I messaged two users I'd been mid-conversation with to let them know what had happened. One of them made a post on it, and this time the mod /u/givesomefucks finally said his first words, threatening to ban them for questioning his actions. In short order 4 other accounts that had all been made within a few days of /u/givesomefucks and had all had no involvement in either of the threads jumped in to attack the user calling them a whiner and mocking them.

That's highly unusual when until then every response between all users had been positive, even after the first post was removed and that was questioned in the second. When I made the post here, many of those same alts that I hadn't had a single word of interaction with that had only appeared to mock users in the Mental Health community for questioning a mod's actions also instantly appeared in the comments here. All of them defending the mod's actions.

That doesn't scream of natural user interactions, it screams of someone flipping through alts.

Abuse of the report button is a bannable offense. (And I suspect your framing comes from an .ml-like perspective.)

As you’ve seen, even suspected AI use has the risk of people acting this way to you.

The only person who acted that way was the moderator who removed the message without bothering to read it. The many people who had replied before that had no issue. Since they had bothered to actually read the words instead of simply glancing at the fact that there were headers it would have been obvious it hadn't been written by AI.

Next, neurotransmitters and the brain are a hell of a lot more complicated than they appear.

I never said they weren't extremely complicated. I was attempting to provide a surface level explanation of how people with symptoms that don't get listed as typical ADHD symptoms such as complete apathy can actually be showing an unusual symptom of ADHD that doesn't get enough attention and is often misdiagnosed.

Of course the brain is extremely complicated. One of the reasons for taking the time to write the post was having ADHD repeatedly misdiagnosed as flavors of depression because the combination of Aphantasia and an intentional inner monologue meant my internal experience was unlike those of the people writing out what to look for and so I wouldn't be using words that would make a mental health professional think of noise.

ADHD is not simply a deficiency of dopamine and norepinephrine. Reducing it to that is highly inaccurate. If that were true, then drugs that increase both of these would be curative. But they aren’t.

Both dopamine and norepinephrine operate on a U-curve where both too little and too much cause issues. As people have varying levels of availability of the two and many of the medications for the condition effect both to varying degrees it's a balancing act.

ADHD involves disturbances of dopamine and norepinephrine, but as to why and how that comes to be is another question. You can look at it as correlation versus causation. There is clearly an association there, but not necessarily a causative one.

I never claimed anything was the root cause of anything. I did not claim to be a magic wizard who is capable of fully analyzing and understanding the minutia of the many different chemical reactions taking place in every cell in the human mind or body at any given instant. In fact I pointed out that studying the available level of neurotransmitters where they need to be in order to be effective can be a bit difficult since a lot of those things can't be tested on a living person.

Psychological disorders are no longer viewed as simple dediciencies in specific neurotransmitters. That is really not the case anymore with modern research. Altered neurotransmitters are a symptom and trying to alter them in other ways with drugs may or may not help a given user. I’m not saying that psych drugs are useless or anything, just that they are more complicated than you’d think. I take a psych med, myself.

I never said they are. A simple deficiency would be the body lacking a given thing, it would be a production issue. If that were the case no ADHD medication on the market would be effective, because none provide those neurotransmitters. The issue is a deficiency in the availability of the neurotransmitters. That could primarily come from either the neuron failing to release them rapidly enough, or the transporter removing them too quickly. The transporter is considered the most likely primary issue, though it's very possible that multiple things play in to it in combination

Your statement about 'altered neurotransmitters' doesn't make any sense. The neurotransmitters themselves are fine, and no ADHD medication attempts to alter them.

At the tail of that long response (which I appreciate) separated from anything else you say:

So in that regard I can see how someone would call an assertion with that as misinformation.

What assertion would that be?

And to your edit, once again that's irrelevant. You're more than capable of looking at the mod log. The mod removed the first post claiming I was using AI and saying I know better than doctors. Neither of those things are accurate. The mod removed the second post in banning me for "medical misinformation." They did not attempt to say what they found to be misinformation, did not bother to respond to the message I had already sent them questioning the removal of the first post, and still have never bothered to reply.

Note that the post that they banned me for misinformation for was the second post, not the first. The entire body of the second post was questioning the act of removing a post they clearly hadn't read in what the sidebar claims is a safe space to discuss mental health issues. That is what led to me being banned for "medical misinformation."

It's indefensible. It's obvious what happened. They assumed a post was AI and deleted it without bothering to read it. I posted again questioning that and so they banned me. They didn't want to put "respect muh authoritah" as the reason for permanently banning a user in the modlog, so they lied and wrote "medical misinformation."

Ahh, now it makes more sense. You're either trying to shift blame from your friend or you're /u/givesomefucks using an alt. The two accounts were made within 20 days 3 years ago, you both mod multiple communities.

Same situation with the other account, /u/betterdeadthanreddit.

/u/betterdeadthanreddit /u/givesomefucks /u/dingus

All 3 accounts created in the same time period 3 years ago, all 3 moderators of multiple non-overlapping communities, and all 3 of them chiming in on this issue on the Mental Health community as seen here: https://lemmy.world/post/50464079

Can we get an instance admin to check in to this please?

The display name doesn't violate any rules, but if anyone ever messaged asking for it to change I'm not emotionally attached to it and would do that.

But the first post was removed and called AI, and then when I posted calling that out I was banned for "medical misinformation." Never a word about the display name.

Yes, but why would you put the burden of proof on the person accused of spreading medical misinformation, especially given the circumstances?

Wouldn't it be far simpler and more direct to expect that if a person is accused of something like that and banned for it the one doing the accusing and banning be able to point to specifically what they had an issue with, so that everyone can easily verify that specific thing is medical misinformation if they'd like?