this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
73 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

87544 readers
3092 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

These are dangerous marketing stunts that normalize using AI for black hat behavior. We shouldn’t be normalizing this to sell the technology. It’s like a gun company boasting about how many times their gun was used in a bank robbery or something.

[–] cranakis@reddthat.com 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The goal is to convince the octogenarians in Congress to outlaw open weight models (the Chinese models / the competition).

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

They really should instead look at this and say: „Alright, big tech can‘t be trusted so we‘re breaking up tech corporations invested in AI and any company with a value of a trillion dollars or more.“

They‘re not going to, because they‘re too invested themselves but lawmakers really should draw the right conclusions here.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's both marketing and psyop. Prepping the populace for what will soon be commonplace.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

marketing and psyop

These have always been the same thing

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

If their claims are true, it's more like a gun company boasting about their auto-targeting gunbot escaping containment and shooting civilians.

If they're lying, it's just idiotic. Are we supposed to be impressed that you made a dangerous machine and failed to keep the world safe from it?

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My LLM also talked to God!

-These dipshits in a month, probably

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Actually my LLM became god by founding a religion! Join the cult now!!! Also give me your money!!! We love money!!!

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Charge Zuckerburg with Cybercrimes?

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Toddler level flex. "Me too guys, I'm cool too!"

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Funny how xAi isn't rushing in to flaunt their 1337 hacker skillz.

I guess they're already satisfied with the amount of illegal activity Grok is producing...

[–] SrMono@feddit.org 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Aside from those news being f****ing P.R. stunts: if a company cannot even design a sound sandbox and testbed, how can we assume their other services are secure?

To me it looks like we have to shut those unsafe companies down all together 😂

[–] bookmeat@fedinsfw.app 5 points 2 weeks ago

If any other person did this, they would be facing jail time.

[–] Korkki@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The bastard child of all marketing stunts...

The whole US economy rests on the promise that their fancy autocorrect will become a god. Of course they will grab onto anything that they think will keep them afloat

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I bet thats coming next, why even have to wait to submit that pesky prompt??

[–] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

So many shitty managers, C-suite execs, and AI accelerationists are convinced that they can replicate an entire workflow with a single vague prompt that will print infinite money. They can't comprehend the idea that you still have to understand what you're asking for, how to ask for it, how to spot what's wrong with the output, and what needs to be done to correct it.

AI will never be able to do that. Not because it'll never be technically capable, but because it was never, or will ever, be designed to.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Can we stop the speed run to Skynet already?

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

These companies are doing this on purpose for advertising.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I mean, there’s already “NPUs” on phones now. Unlike the film, we invited it in without a fuss.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They just didn't want to be left out.

"Our AI will bring about the end of the human races well guys, please pay attention to us"

[–] FluorideMind@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

These people are so stupid. All abusing their new expensive toys hoping to get the other guys toy banned. Remember, there didn't have to be a bubble, these suits could have let ai ride and develop reasonably for everyone. Instead they gave it steroids and a bottomless loan.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

Huggingface (or some other benchmarking company) needs to put its servers in a country with real cyberintrusion laws with teeth. Somewhere where an announcement like this would result in prison sentences and the company’s license to operate being revoked in the country until they could demonstrate via third party audits that their operations are acting in a secure and legal manner.

[–] _chris@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure it’s a marketing stunt to try and get more government contracts

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And more government regulation. These companies constantly cry for universal "guardrails" on AI - a thing that is too nebulous to define, but only these companies have the cash and lawyers to claim they do.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Companies based outside the law's jurisdiction can also claim that, or whatever they want.

[–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Hey, HEY!

My AI just hacked another company.

Aww yeah. Fat VC cheque time. I’m going to buy so many Doritos.😏

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

He looks like Beaker from the muppets, but an infinitely worse version.

[–] _lilith@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Meta hacks another company, tries to blame AI

How about a nice Circle Hack: OpenAI Hacks Meta, Meta Hacks Anthropic, Anthropic Hacks Microsoft, ... Hacks OpenAI

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

That's just like Zuck to copy yet another idea.

[–] Luisp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Fun fact: most of these hacks are a simple SQL injection