this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
56 points (98.3% liked)

politics

30941 readers
2524 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's these childrens' future, so I think it's fair. Also put classes in public schools teaching them how to vote and what the voting process looks like.

[–] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's a 12 year old's future too. Should they vote? How about guns? Should 16 year olds be in the army? It's their future. They should be allowed to fight for it if they want. How about the mines? If a 16 year old wants to quit school and work in the mines full time, should they? It's their future after all.

[–] hellabryanstyle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It’s a 12 year old’s future too. Should they vote?

Yes.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

How would you feel if you were old enough to have . . . sexual intercourse . . . with a partner of your choice . . . and yet you could not drink in pubs.

[–] SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I recently started treatment for my alcohol dependency; imo, no one should drink it. Alcohol is basically poison. It is worse the younger you start:

The brain is still developing throughout the teen years. Research shows that heavy drinking in the teen years can cause long-lasting harm to their learning, memory, and reasoning.

https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohols-effects-health/niaaa-middle-school/too-soon-too-dangerous

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The least poisonous of its siblings, yes. There is, in fact, an alcohol that 16 year olds can absolutely drink. Legally too! Isopropanol can be bought from your local store as hand sanitizer.

While it probably won't kill you, the effects of the hangover is far far worse than typical ethanol. There's a very good chance that anyone who drinks it will end up in the hospital. Turns out the nail polish remover the body makes from isopropanol is very dangerous.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Huh. So it turns out something that sounds bad for you is bad for you.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 2 points 3 weeks ago

But even that can't compare to drinking methanol to get drunk, which is sure to make you blind, and then dead. Formaldehyde is even more bad for you than acetone is.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Like an American

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'd feel the exact same way I feel right now given that's the current British legal situation. Age of consent is 16, alcohol purchase is 18+.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Deleted. Looks like UK allows people to join the military at 16.