this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
79 points (96.5% liked)

politics

30584 readers
2122 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump is complaining to a federal court about the millions of dollars he was recently forced to pay out in the long-running defamation case brought and won by writer E. Jean Carroll.

Now, with the money already in Carroll's possession, Trump's legal team is alleging that Carroll's legal team misled the court.

"While the funds remained safely in CRIS, counsel assured this Court that they would be placed in an 'interest-bearing account,'" the reply brief goes on. "After securing possession, Plaintiff disclosed that the funds were instead placed in a personal investment account for her retirement—and invoked the S&P 500 to justify keeping them there. That was not a clarification. It was a bait-and-switch on the precise assurance used to resist judicial intervention."

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 20 points 7 hours ago

WTAF? Since when does the criminal have any say in how their fine is spent?

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

So he tried to steal her money but found he couldn't.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 68 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

In the US, the president gets to decide what you do with your money, I guess.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 22 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

If he keeps doing what he's doing, we'll end up using it as toilet paper or burning it for warmth.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago

Brasil in the 80s.

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 2 points 10 hours ago (3 children)
[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Let me get back to you on that in a few months.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 1 points 10 hours ago

Winter is coming.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world -3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I can tell you wholeheartedly based strictly on the size and quality of my garlic harvest that this past winter was incredibly fucking cold where I live at least

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

You needed a garlic harvest to tell you that?

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world -3 points 8 hours ago

No? Do you need someone to read what i wrote for you?

[–] AmyAye@nord.pub 3 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, he has no say, she could blow it allon Funko Pops if she wanted.

[–] Radical_Socialist_t00t@lemmy.ca 13 points 8 hours ago

Ask him about his family's crypto scams

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 48 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Let's remind everyone what this about. He said she lied about being raped and 12 civil jurors (still jurors) decided that she didn't lie and that she was raped.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 47 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I still can't get over the President of the USA being a convicted rapist

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, so... "Convicted of rape" is a legal term for criminal court. Both "convicted" and "rape" carry legal definitions distinct from the civil version "found liable for sexual assault."

I know it's splitting hairs, but that's what lawyers do.

Civil court cannot impose jail time and does not have a criminal component. Proceedings for each can be had with separate outcomes. Prime example, OJ Simpson. Not guilty of murder, but found liable for death.

Stupid as fuck.

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] III@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] finley@lemmy.zip 27 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Then he said she lied about that, and another jury awarded her another $83 million. Still waiting for that payout, by the way.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 8 hours ago

More eventual retirement money invested in the market then.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

If I were E, I'd consider buying ad space to display my market gains. Maybe a billboard, definitely a website. Possibly hire a guy to make a statue for the national mall. Idk, I'd have some fun with this.

I'm all about finding the thing that would piss him off most, and investing heavily in that.

Billboard at the entrance to Maralago.

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

The money remained safely in cris? I was not aware of this...

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 19 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

It's her money. She can do whatever she wants with it

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 14 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Die Trump, die. Take your rotten offspring with you and join all the ghouls down in hell.

[–] killea@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ajoebyanyothername@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

No one who speaks German could be an evil man.

[–] killea@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Joey Joe Joe!!

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 17 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 11 points 10 hours ago

Was that a defamatory remark from the defamator-in-chief, again? Cha-ching!

[–] FoolishObserver@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

He's probably waiting until the new dollar coins get minted so he can pay in currency with his face on it because he is a petty little man.

[–] AmyAye@nord.pub 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I keep expecting him to simultaneously announce they are discontinuing paper ones with the stupid dollar coin.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 2 points 6 hours ago

No vending machine on the planet will take them.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

Bullies gotta bully.