this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
511 points (99.2% liked)

politics

30610 readers
3626 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mayor Zohran Mamdani charged Benjamin Nentayahu with genocide, said he is unwelcome in New York City, and called for his arrest. Two years ago, that would have been unimaginable. Going forward, it should be a litmus test.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] darthsundhaft@piefed.social 37 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Cool. Now let's also say what we're all thinking: Trump should be in there with him. Preferably in the same cell so that it's awkward af.

[–] Trampampoline@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Nah, there's a balance to Mamdani, too extreme and Trump will send Meal Team 6in after him and make some public example of him.

Mamdani is biding his time and building a base at the hopes of a newer, better, less-bought Democrat party by the next election. He can't do that from a blacksite in chains.

if we ever have another fair election,... if anyone considers what we had as fair.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Moderation is called "balance" when you like a candidate.

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

After seeing the Russian Tails in the numbers for 2016, 2020, and 2024 favoring Trump. It's for sure feels like we haven't seen a fair election in over a decade and I currently question our elections and think they are illegitimate. And that's not even going into the known cheating that happened in Ohio that helped Bush get into office(or the Florida shenanigans from the same election for that matter).

So yeah, I think Trump cheated with Russia's(and/or Israel's) and Elon's help is illegitimate. Though to be fair he was illegitimate after trying to spawn and insurrection, and should have been hanged for High Treason already.

[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

We havent had a fair election in my entire life. Bush straight up stole the election from Gore, and even if theres none of that extreme blatant stealing, everything is rigged so hard in favor of republicans, from voting booth locations, to gerrymandering, to right wing thugs being intimidating, etc etc.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 days ago

Imagine a world where Al Gore won in 2000, and Bernie Sanders in 2016. Sigh...

Can't change the past though. Might as well wish Jimmy Carter beat Reagan in '81, and JFK and LBJ both served two full terms...

It's crazy to think how different the world could be if a few evil republicans didn't ratfuck everything.

Nixon, Reagan, Bush2, and tRump. The sheer amount of the world's woes that can be laid squarely at the feet of just four people is astounding...

It's not like they didn't have help. But if it weren't for those four presidencies, so much shit never would have happened...

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Valid as fuck set of points. You're not wrong.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, except he's apparently alive and the 2008 and 2020 elections weren't included in his list.

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You're going to need to elaborate, you've lost me with what exactly you're trying to get at with being so vague. Traditionally you use the subject's name, before switching to pronouns so the reader knows who the fuck you're talking about.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is not hard to follow. You responded to someone, your comment appears below theirs. I responded to you, my comment appears below yours. Notice how this trend continues.

How is he "right" in saying there has "never" been a fair election in his lifetime but he's not including two of them? Has he died and come to life repeatedly?

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Just because Dems win, doesn't make them fair. Gerrymanding is a very unfair tactic, and Republicans have been disenfranchising voters since before I could vote. And if they cheated, in 2004, why the fuck would they not continue to cheat in every election afterwards? It's a valid logic path to follow, and to assume that every election is likely unfair and has only gotten more unfair since then.

2020 was won by Biden, but in no way was the election fair. Trump did everything in his power to interfere, and would have won if not for covid basically enforcing nationwide mail in ballots, which turns out to be pretty hard to cheat. Though we did find millions of ballots in ditches, and various other places that never got counted (Edit: In 2024). So yeah... Maybe you're just ignorant of all the data points?

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago

Russia's disinformation attempts isn't voter fraud and we're really shooting ourselves in the foot by replicating their "stop the steal" nonsense.

Preferably in the same cell

C'mon, this is elementary stuff. You don't want to give them the opportunity to coordinate their lies.

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

Preferably in the same cell so that it's awkward af.

If you think trump is not gonna stop giving that sloppy toppy to netanyahu irl then you have a more favourable view of politics then I do

[–] CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Hah. It wouldn't be awkward cos they'd be fucking! Haha.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No he doesn't, he belongs 6 feet under.

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't know what I'd prefer, him rotting 6ft under or rotting behind bars. Knowing the global prison system and the privileges given to rich/well connected people I'd probably want the former tho

I think he should be sentenced to the same war crimes he committed.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

How much do you want to bet a Mossad agent has had him in his sights before?

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I’m shocked everyday that there ain’t an assassination attempt on him. My politics are more extreme than his but his platform is violently opposed to the status quo and its overlords

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Most assassination attempts are by nutjobs, not some intricate conspiracy. Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction, but not always.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Because that would be instant martyrdom and would further the movement. I guarantee Isreal, republicans and democrats are all looking at him like a hawk waiting for him to slip up. They can't just kill him, he needs to be tarred and feathered and his beliefs discredited.

We're just lucky he's such a baller you can't catch him slipping.

Do you mean to say they're trying to catch him riding dirty?

[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (4 children)

We can't let mayors do that kind of shit though. You know how many yee-heil podunk mayors out there would start arresting every unauthorized tan?

[–] VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

He's the mayor for more people than several US governors are governors for

Wyoming still hasn't hit one million

Also, those good ol' boy, wannabe Boss Hogg mayors would do that anyway

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago

Gee, we gotta abolish Wyoming

[–] GardenGeek@europe.pub 2 points 3 days ago

I'd say he's free to express his opinion as he isn't in charge of arresting him against the will of the admin. The MAGAs do this all the time or I did I get something wrong?

To say someone isn't welcome in your city is within the range of things a major should be allowed to do imho.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Here comes to the excuse train.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 days ago

Mamdani is right but you are more right.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Two years ago, I would have said he is Pali-pilled beyond reach.

Now I think he is simply stating a fact.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 23 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Sadly this isn’t some new development after Oct 7, the Nakba was in 1948 and the details we now know of Israeli atrocities from that event are truly horrifying. The Israelis have been brutally terrorizing their neighbors for over 75 years, Bibi is just a natural extension of that campaign of terror. Israel is the most egregious terrorist organization in the world, bar none.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh I can think of a much better place for Netanyahu to be...

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I need some rop and a strong branch

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world -3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Didn’t this guy promise he’d arrest him? More sloppulist fallacies?

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Point to were he made that promise... I'll wait. He basically said he would if he could and then confirmed what everyone already knew. That he doesn't have the authority to do so.

[–] detren@sh.itjust.works -2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yes. This is his further affirmation of that promise. However he can only do it now if Netanyahu comes to New York (which he probably won’t do)

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

He literally says in the video he cannot arrest him.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

No, the New York Post made a scare-tactic article about Mamdani saying he would. It wasn't meant for you.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Article is authwalled. Can someone post its full contents in the comments?

[–] omxxi@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 3 days ago

That site doesn't load. It looks like a captcha that doesn't load on secure browsers

load more comments
view more: next ›