this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
182 points (96.9% liked)

Funny

15881 readers
45 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 20cello@lemmy.world 66 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You know something is wrong when the drug dealers are more honest than the ruling class

[–] Elting@piefed.social 44 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, when you can't use the law to rig the competition, you have to remain competitive.

[–] argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

@Elting

Yeah, whenever a so-called capitalist talks about building a moat, it's like, that is the opposite of capitalism.

@20cello

[–] nitroemdash@lemmy.wtf 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No source — discarding data.

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

But the Y axis says that they're almost at 150% purity. And down to almost $80/kilo

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

150% of the baseline

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

This graph is great at showing a selective part of reality. Free market thinking and capitalism tend to do well on those.

[–] probable_possum@leminal.space 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

So. Supply is bigger than in 2014? I don't think demand is in decline.

So drug trafficking gangs found better ways to move their product into the target countries.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Much bigger supply, higher quality, lower prices.

Basically they just produce way more than before.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

How can purity go above 100? Is this concentrated cocaine? Supposed to water it down first or something?

[–] Bademantel@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

100 is the relative purity and price in 2014.

Would like to see absolute numbers.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is a relative scale. 100 being the baseline.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

So a random sample will contain 1.4 times as much coke, for 80% of the cost.

[–] slevinkelevra@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not one random sample but the average of all samples.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

The random sample collectively.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

What... Is your instance name

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Presumably 40% less non-coke inclusion. So if before it was 90% coke and 10% cut, it'd be 94/6

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

Specifically from around 40-50% to 70-80%.

It's impossible to get more than roughly 85-90% purity as that's the purity they export.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

That makes a lot more sense. Or the quality was originally absolutely terrible.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

It clearly says 2014=100. Ergo a value of 160 is 3222.4 on the purity scale. You're going to need a lot of water.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

For our purposes, 140 will do fine.

[–] Abrinoxus@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago

Imagine if the market was that free for consumer goods

[–] BeUnique@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Finally some uplifting news 😁

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

And Americans just get theirs cut with Fentanyl!

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

I've paid 50 euros per gram (currently 86% pure) for at least the past 10 years.

[–] kubofhromoslav@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Economies of scale? 🤔