this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
147 points (99.3% liked)

politics

30540 readers
3042 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump did not take kindly to being asked whether he believed bombing civilian power plants and bridges would constitute war crimes after he threatened to do just that in Iran.

The president, 80, was taking questions from reporters in the Oval Office when he was asked about his threat this week on Truth Social.

“You’re talking about blowing up civilian power plants and bridges. Much of the civilized world would consider that a war crime. Do you?” the reporter asked Trump point blank.

The president paused for a moment before deciding it was probably best not to answer the question at all, which had clearly annoyed him.

“Uhhh, I won’t respond to that question,” Trump said before demanding to know which outlet the reporter worked for.

“The New York Times,” the reporter responded.

“I figured so; the failing New York Times,” Trump said before turning away.

HE ordered the targeting of civilians (remember the girls school?) and civilian infrastructure. War criminals are held to account. If you don't wanna be a war criminal held to account, stop doing war crimes.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 29 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

He wasnt cornered. He was asked a question, refused to answer and nobody else asked the same thing.

Journalists in America are fucking cowards

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

The US - where anything more than the gentlest of softball questions is hard hitting journalism.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Cornered? Bruh, he doesn’t care, at all. War crimes really only matter when there is accountability involved. The United States government and military will never acknowledge nor accept responsibility for the numerous war crimes it has committed, past or present.

Who reads these articles and responds “Yo they got him good! XD”.

Israel commits war crimes daily, and nothing happens. In other conflicts throughout the world, rape is used as a weapon of war, children are forced to carry AK’s. Let’s corner those leaders! We’ll show them!

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

There will be a post Trump. He'll die long before he faces consequences, but there will be a lot of political will to see someone suffer

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

lol, good one. When has anyone from the United States government been tried for war crimes? Would that not need to be prosecuted at The Hague?

Idk why people think anything will be different. It’s good to have something to hold on to, I guess.

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 15 minutes ago* (last edited 13 minutes ago) (1 children)

IIRC, they have a mandate to invade the Hague to liberate US officials, so not only will they not offer people up, they will kill not to.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 minutes ago* (last edited 11 minutes ago)

This cat gets it. Until the United States empire falls, there will be no accountability. It will fall, eventually, but no time soon.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

There's a lot of anger. The ICC and the concept of war crimes itself haven't been around for even a century, we live in a time of unprecedented things

I'm not saying the right people will be punished, but there will be punishment

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

Oh my sweet summer child.

[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 33 points 5 hours ago

"Trump, 80..." Gets me every time

[–] tiny_hedgehog@piefed.social 29 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I love it when they include this asshole’s age after his name. Just to draw attention to the fact that not only is he a raging unhinged narcissistic lunatic, but and old raging unhinged narcissistic lunatic.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 4 hours ago

It’s clickbait. At first glance, one hopes the rest of the headline announces his death. We are let down each time.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 27 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

War criminals are held to account.

When did that start? It seems to me that only happens to the poor ones. It's the same enforcement standard as any other law.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

When did that start?

Past (none were poor):

Recent war-crime prosections:

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Have we prosecuted any rich war criminals recently? It is telling that you have to go back to the Nazis, 80+ years ago was the last time that happened.

The ICC has prosecuted 54 individuals for war crimes, and 47 of them have been from Africa. Do you think war crimes are only happening in Africa? Or are the rest of the world's war criminals getting away with it?

Do you actually think we will see a trial for the biggest war criminals like Trump and Netanyahu?

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Well, the US withdrew from the ICC, but here is a list of everyone convicted of war crimes (rich countries included).

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 4 points 5 hours ago

Not only will they not, the US will use force to make sure about that. The only reason Trump isn't labeled a war criminal by the ICC is because he'd probably bomb the Netherlands directly after. Or Belgium, as if he cared or knew.

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago

When I read “Trump, 80” there is only one word I expect to follow.