Mistral letting Microsoft use their servers defeats the entire point of the company existing.
Europe
News and information from Europe πͺπΊ
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)
Just make good games and consoles, you dumb motherfuckers. Holy shit.
its called into deep, MS has put all thier eggs into the AI basket, and they cant afford to backtrack.
Enter a whole new market?
Donβt get the negativity. This does not mit Mistral models are less safe or sending data somewhere else. And itβs bringing US money into the EU, which in my books is a win. Also Mistral gets to position their models ok Azure. Not sure why people are so negative about this
You have to be very naive to believe that.
It's always the same... there is a interesting europe based alternative for US-Techgiants and after a while it is bought or "a deal" is made... very sad!
Can you explain what you think the problem with this deal is? Frankly, I'd be far more worried if it was Mistral using MS servers, as MS would then have physical access to Mistral data. MS using Mistral servers... I'm not sure I see the problem.
Never forget that Microsoft mantra and MO is "embrace, extend, extinguish".
I can't explain. I'm just very sceptical, that MS cuts a billion dollar deal to just use their servers... they could just build server infrastructure for that money...
Server infrastructure is currently bottlenecked, see the price of RAM and storage which is a direct consequence of the AI craze.
Building new data centers is not easy from a hardware perspective, not to mention permits, electrical/connectivity infrastructure, staffing and so on.
Yes, but that only puts an upper limit on the price that anyone would be willing to pay.
It's like this: Both companies estimate how much money they expect to make from using those servers for their own purposes. In Mistral's case, that might be a negative amount. Regardless, Microsoft obviously can put the capacity to better use. So they can offer to rent it from Mistral for more than Mistral believes it can make on its own. Basically, MS passes on some of their profits to Mistral.
LLM companies that are seeing less success end up renting out their now-superfluous infrastructure (see also: Anthropic using Grok's infra), so this sounds like Mistral isn't seeing the success they were planning for when they bought their current infra?
That's a red flag, I'm out. What European alternatives are left now, Lumo?
Mistral is allowing MS to use Mistral AI for European MS customers becasue Mistralβs GDPR iiuc.
Like an addict crawling back to their dealer.
Man, imagine being so wildly opposed to even there concept of not spying on people that despite having all of the existing global infrastructure you could ever need, you'd rather flush billions of dollars down the drain than just figure out something like E2EE.
I'm sure the valuations are all correct. /s Now we are saying "multi-billion" instead of "billions" to open up the door for the general usage of "trillion". These amounts make no sense and are almost meaningless. Someone should do the cost-accounting on these numbers. I bet there would be a huge difference between "reporting" and reality.
This makes it easier for many to try Mistral because many already use MS Foundry and you can easily switch models. In contrast, getting through the bureaucracy of negotiating a contract with yet another provider, Mistral, is harder.
However, Mistral via MS is not as sovereign as Mistral directly even though Microsoft wants you to believe that:
In a joint interview with Reuters, Microsoft President Brad Smith and Mistral CEO Arthur Mensch said the partnership aimed to deliver βsuch sovereignty while allowing access to US software and security features.
Fuck Mistral, I guess. Fuck every support of Microslop.