this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
449 points (97.9% liked)

Applied Psychology

561 readers
27 users here now

Like any other psychology sub, except only post psychology things that are immediately usable. For example, see the posts in this sub.

You can edit titles to make the how to apply this psychology to your life more obvious.

Related:

https://lemmy.ca/c/lpt

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Pregnancy bumps are lower...

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 14 points 2 days ago

passangers looked up because they noticed the guy in the weird costume and then realized the pregnant woman which otherwise wouldn't have.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] CorrenteAlternata@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Thank you!

When inquired about the reason for the prosocial gesture, most of the responses in the two conditions referred to the importance of recognizing pregnancy, with some directly referring to social norms, education, or safety (see Table 1).

Interestingly, among those who left their spot in the experimental condition, nobody directly associated their gesture with the presence of Batman, and 14 (43.75%) reported that they did not see Batman at all.

Interestingly, while the data suggest that this perturbation may have a strong effect, a notable percentage of individuals were not consciously aware of the reason behind it. Given that attention is socially influenced (e.g., the phenomenon where people instinctively look toward the same point of interest as those around them), we can hypothesize that the pattern of awareness triggered by a disruption in routine may be socially transmitted, extending beyond its original cause. This may also help account for the subset of participants who reported not noticing Batman but nevertheless offered their seat. A speculative interpretation is that the disruptive effect can operate at an interpersonal level: shifts in attention or prosocial cues triggered in some individuals may spread socially within the group, influencing behavior even among those not directly aware of the initial disruption, consistently with research on the social contagion and interpersonal synchrony of prosocial and emotional behaviors14.

This was a really interesting read!

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The potential applications for this research are worth a mention, too:

These findings contribute to discussions on how public spaces and social interventions can be designed to encourage kindness and cooperation. If unexpected yet non-threatening events can increase mindfulness and prosocial behavior, urban planners, policymakers, and psychologists may consider ways to integrate “positive disruptions” into daily life. This could range from artistic or theatrical interventions in public spaces to strategic messaging campaigns designed to momentarily break routine and engage individuals more deeply with their environment and community.

It sounds like more public art can lead to more pro-social behavior, especially if the art is changed periodically (to keep it "unexpected.") There's a lot to be explored with this idea.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] badcommandorfilename@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Sure, but where is the control group who saw ManBat instead of BatMan? Further research is required.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Kn1ghtDigital@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

I was expecting a meme and I'm walking away learning about pro-social behavior

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Was it because of morality associated with a superhero? Batman specifically? Or was it just because normally people mind their own business and avoid looking around and qualifying one another until an unmissable weirdo is in their presence and they keep looking and only then notice the pregnant woman?

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No, they are batman haters and don't want batman to get the seat.

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He can buy his own seat.

Hell, he can buy his own train!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I wouldn't want to be in a vulnerable position like being seated if Batman was about to get into a brawl with goons.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Need to repeat the experiment but with someone dressed as the joker.

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Also with batman and joker fighting.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

and with pregnant batman vs pregnant joker

[–] zeet@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago

The patriarchy don't respect the matriarchy unless in the presence of the batriarchy. Got it.

[–] tino@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Batman takes the metro after a long night fighting crime. His feet hurt. He just wants to sit for a few minutes. Why is no one offering Batman a seat?

[–] Batman@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What if some crazy shit breaks out? Can't have Batman all relaxed and unprepared.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Dude, I want you well rested and ready to fight at a moment's notice. You get a whole bench if you want it. Hell, I'd even listen^1^ if you just need to vent; Joker has got be fucking exhausting to deal with.


  1. It's no superpower, but it's what I can do.
[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

To be fair Batman has no superpowers either. Except being a filthy rich guy.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

filthy rich, and access to the world's best sports science and putting in some effort to use it.
So he has at least one single actual merit: He did exercise.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

isnt it just thay you're more likely to notice someone dressed up, and the people around them whilst staring at your phone, instead of never looking up because the pregnant woman has normal trousers

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What an interesting potential explanation! Guess you'll have to go out and test to find out. You could also choose less bombastic moral characters to test if the moral judgement angle is also true (like a priest with his tab removed)

[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 8 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Pretty sure that was the hypothosis the experimenters came to. Suddenly seeing batman out of the corner of your eye is way more jarring that it forces you to focus more on your surrondings.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I think an easier experiment would be the same pregnant woman, but alone and she's wearing more eye catching trousers + shoes

(Easier in the sense that I don't have to do anything...)

[–] m0stlyharmless@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Yes. This would be important to differentiate between the associations with the Batman character and an eye catching abnormality.

It would also be interesting to see what the impact of the Joker would be. If the Joker would also elicit greater propensity to offer the seat to the pregnant woman, once could claim that Joker, being the antithesis to Batman, similarly leads one to think of the imperative to offer the pregnant woman the seat.

Finally, another important variation would be another eye catching character specific to this experiment rather than one belonging to a fictional franchise.

This would allow one to more clearly differentiate the impact between the control (just the pregnant woman) with the introduction of eye catching costumes and with the pregnant woman wearing something eye catching herself.

Another important experimental design consideration would be to avoid repeat passengers between the multiple trials.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago

Was it because they were dressed as Batman or because everyone assumed it was being videoed and didnt want to be recorded and uploaded as a stupid prank.

When people think they are being watched and recorded, they are more likely to polite. Dont need someone dressed as a superhero to do that part.

[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Probably because people are often too distracted, something that takes attention like someone wearing a Batman costume, would bring people attention to their surroundings

[–] manualoverride@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Right! I demand a retest with the Riddler

This actually really does sound like a good addition to the study. See if it's any different with a villain.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I actually had to look for this to see if it's true, it was, but for some reason the article blurred their faces

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago

Don't want to reveal Batman's secret identity, now would we?

[–] trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

A while ago, I also heard of a study, where they had kids do a task until the kids would give up. And when they let the kids dress up as their favorite superhero, the kids would persevere much longer.

Obviously, the kids being in a better mood can be a factor, but if I remember correctly, it was also a conclusion that the kids persevered, because they thought the superhero would persevere in this situation.
You can probably tell quite well, when their mood falls off a cliff, but they still push on, so could certainly see that being a conclusion...

[–] eyelevel@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There was also a study where adults were timed for how long they could hold their hand in a bowl of ice water. One group was allowed to swear during the experiment and the other was not. The group that could swear held their hands in the ice bowl longer. So perhaps the adult version of being a superhero is just being someone who can swear a lot?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

bollocks, bollocks, BOLLOOOOOOCKS

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The number of people actually asking questions in here on Lemmy makes me happy. If I could, I'd give all of y'all each a cookie.

[–] turdas@suppo.fi 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago

Because I value asking good questions rather than a) assuming, or b) just not even asking or wondering

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Were they also testing people's reactions to triplets?

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just gotta say thats an extremely unconvincing pregnant woman

[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Batman isn't very convincing either

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reader@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago

they were all just trying to get away from the wierdo dressed as batman

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wonder what specifically about Batman causes that? Would the same thing happen with Superman? Wonder Woman? Punisher? Would it happen with a child dressed as Batman?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

they should have used Robin as a control. This is the problem with psychology studies calling themselves science. Maybe people are so self involved on their phones they didn't see the preggo but Batman distracted them.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The effect, for listeners who might not know, refers to the children's character "the Bat-Man" a strong gentleman who fights crime nocturnally

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"sorry, I would give you my seat, but Batman's here and I want to skew the data"

load more comments
view more: next ›