this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
173 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

86814 readers
3286 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Wow, so uh, that’s gonna come out to fractions of a cent on the dollar, in terms of actual revenue generated from flagrant copyright violations.

It is deeply infuriating how fundamentally our society is designed to protect of people and organizations that are already blindingly wealthy.

[–] username_1@discuss.tchncs.de 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Authors will receive next to nothing too :) Only publishers.

Just like God intended.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

That's the point of publishing deals, though. Authors don't need to pay upfront costs, in return the publishers get to keep the revenues. Not really related to AI.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago

Fifty-four known class members and over 500,000 potential class members will each receive an estimated $3,100 per work, from approximately 482,000 works.

Still too low IMO but a big upgrade

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

Still, paying even just the $3000 for a single book from this lawsuit is going to be quite hard when you are making zero profit whatsoever. LLM AI was unprofitable when the training data was free, they are even more so if they have to pay even a cent per item. And I really doubt it's going to stop with this one batch and payment and they can just go back to pirating the stuff for free.

[–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Will this perhaps set a precedent for future models where authors will be able to price their work differently?

[–] piskertariot@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago

$1.5B, and they get to keep the knowledge, which will be distilled by future models for generations.

You will own nothing. Not even your own art.

[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why is a single payment for an arbitrary amount of money still enforced to the authors?

Anthropic should have all their models deleted so they start from the beginning following copyright laws.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The claimants have deemed it acceptable.

[–] UltraBlack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

And it's probably a fine line between something and the entire deal being deemed excessive

[–] errer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Good link, but I don't think that's going to apply to any of us here 🤷‍♀️️

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I wonder how the venture capital firms that fund Anthropic's money-burning operation feel about this. "Oh look, now I know how that particular funding round's money was actually spent. Fantastic."

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

I know this has nothing to do with that, but the word publishers always reminds me of a thing.

FUCK YOU ELSEVIER

[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Steal now, pay a cheap price later. Sounds like a pretty good deal, right?

In a more just world, Dario Amodei would be in a prison cell wearing a t-shirt as skirt right now while some burly guy parks his bike up Dario’s dirt track, but alas the Epstein class are the bike parkers, not the parkees.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just forwarded the search link to a friend. He coauthored a long out-of-date book on podcasting, and it's on their list. A lot of these authors will get a nice bonus.

[–] sanitation@lemmy.today -1 points 1 week ago

my company gonna sue them too

[–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

How much does this affect their bankruptcy estimate?

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interesting to see Lemmy users who are normally "information should be free" supporters suddenly support the copyright system

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Information between you and me? Yes.

Information a trillion dollar company really wants to get their greedy hands on? Fuck you, play by the rules of the society you have shaped.

[–] ReluctantZen@feddit.nl 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But this means there's still no precedence, no?

[–] FatCrab@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

Thia is to settle their infringement from when they literally torrented giant chunks of their training corpus. It has nothing to do with any sort of infringement theory based on encoding learning from material but just old fashioned liability for flagrant piracy.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago

Yes. A settlement means there was no finding, and no admission of guilt.