M orons
A re
G overning
A merica!
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2026
94 points (95.2% liked)
politics
30540 readers
2374 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Multiple administrations didn't take Israel's bait (the last attempt was during the Biden admin). The US intelligence agencies and the military have long advised against external actions towards Iran for this one single reason (the straight). Trump and his brain dead cronies are the first, thanks to ignorance, incompetence, hubris, and unadulterated stupidity.
I wouldn't rule out blackmail either. The way he capitulated the moment Israel kept bombing Lebanon was pretty transparent.
The way he capitulated the moment Israel kept bombing Lebanon was pretty transparent.
Don't forget how weak-willed he is, too. It may be that no blackmail was needed.
Moreover, a war meant to strengthen US global power weakened it — by deepening the transatlantic rift within NATO, overstretching the US military and creating a global impression that Trump had blundered into a costly war with no plan to end it.
Trump did achieve his objective to weaken NATO, which he had been pursuing well before this war, by constantly admonishing its allies and threatening to leave. But because of the belligerent way Trump acts about everything, of course the US doesn't have the trust for countries to just blindly jump into random military adventures. That's the real power, in many cases more useful than kinetic power that Trump squandered for US military forces.
He doesn’t consider tradeoffs systematically or plot out complicated maneuvers several steps in advance. Trump follows his instincts ; he assumes that superior US power will force opponents to back down.
Far as I can tell he just looks at what authority he has and sees how he leverage it to solely his benefit. If the author wants to call that his instincts, sure, but I attribute his total lack of planning to narcissism. Maybe in his first term, he had enough competent people in the top brass to execute a workable war strategy. Now, his war cabinet is now a Fox & Friends clownshow, and the most powerful guns, military tech, ships and planes can only partially compensate for the Russian-style incompetent sycophantic executive leaders.
It's barely even strategy. The conclusion should be that minimal strategy and discipline can defeat gross incompetence and a demented, low-intellect leader surrounded by sycophants.
Never had
Iran clearly didn’t author Art of The Deal
Neither did Trump.
It’s actually incredible that he definitely did have an extensive plan on how to tackle every single one of the entirely predictable circumstances he put the country in, but they were written by TRAITORS and the current occupiers of the office don’t know how to read
I remember this orange dipshit telling the viewers of the presidential debate with Kamala that he has concept of a plan~~plans for plans~~. The man is full of plans…
What a fucking loser
He said he had a concept of a plan. That means he had no plan.
Yes, that was it!! Hardly something I wanted to remember in for a quote and I knew it was something like that.
thank you!
What strategy?
More like geography. Iran is on the Strait of Hormuz on 2 sides, and no amount of firepower can overcome that.